Read the text of this document (33 pages)
Caring for Our Children:
Enhancing Fostering
Provision and Support
A review by the Children, Families & Education Select Committee
Councillors on the Committee:
Councillor Heena Makwana (Chair)
Councillor Ekta Gohil (Vice-Chair)
Councillor Peter Smallwood OBE
Councillor Kishan Bhatt
Councillor Jan Sweeting
Councillor Narinder Garg
Councillor Tony Gill
Mr Tony Little (Co-Opted Member)
2025/2026
Page 2
Contents
Page
Chair’s Foreword 3
Acknowledgements 4
Terms of Reference 5
Summary of recommendations to Cabinet 6
Background to the review 7
Evidence and witness testimony 8
Findings, Conclusions & Recommendations 15
Background papers 18
Additional Resources 19
Appendices 20
Page 3
Chair’s Foreword
Foster care plays a vital and life changing role in ensuring that
children who cannot live with their birth families are given the
stability, care and belonging they deserve.
The Committee embarked on this review at a pivotal time for
Hillingdon’s fostering service – during a period of significant
transformation and renewed ambition to strengthen our offer for
both foster carers and the children they care for.
Throughout the course of this review, Members engaged with
officers, foster carers, and young people whose lived experiences
shaped our understanding in profound and meaningful ways. Their
honesty, insight and willingness to share personal journeys helped
us to see not only the strengths of our current provision but also the
areas where focused improvement can make a real and lasting
difference.
We heard powerful testimony from young people about the importance of feeling informed,
understood and listened to. Their reflections reinforced the need for consistent, personalised
information, strong matching processes, and supportive relationships that give them safety,
confidence and hope for the future. We also heard from dedicated foster carers who give their
time and energy to making a difference, while navigating challenges that highlight the need for
greater commitment to support, training and peer networks.
The recommendations within this report are designed to be practical, meaningful and aligned with
our shared responsibility as corporate parents. They focus on three key areas: elevating the voice
and experience of young people, strengthening specialist training pathways for foster carers, and
enhancing peer support for both carers and Cared for Children. Together, these changes aim to
strengthen stability, improve outcomes and ensure that every young person in Hillingdon can
thrive in a loving and supportive home environment.
On behalf of the Committee, I would like to express my sincere thanks to everyone who
contributed to this review, especially our young people whose input has been invaluable and is
deeply appreciated. As well as to Democratic Services Officer, Ryan Dell for his support in
organising the witness sessions and for diligently capturing the minutes of each meeting.
Councillor Heena Makwana
Chair of the Children, Families & Education Select Committee
Page 4
Acknowledgements
The Committee would like to thank all officers and witnesses for their valuable contributions to
this review:
• Alex Coman, Director of Children’s Safeguarding & Care
• Ash Knight, Children’s Participation Team Manager
• Autumn Doyle-Field, Children’s Participation Officer
• Councillor Colleen Sullivan, Fostering & Permanence Panel representative
• Donna Hugh, Assistant Director for Care Provision Services
• Foster carers
• Kathryn Angelini, Assistant Director for Education
• Lisa Steel, Virtual School Headteacher
• Natalie Craig, Service Manager – Care Delivery
• Young people
The Committee would like to especially thank the foster carers and young people for their
important input into this review.
Page 5
Terms of Reference
The following Terms of Reference were agreed by the Committee from the outset of the review:
1. To understand the needs and experiences of children in foster care through examining
demographics, underrepresented groups, placement types, placement stability,
educational attainment, wellbeing and emerging trends.
2. To evaluate the effectiveness of current recruitment and retention strategies, and support
available to foster carers, including the impact of the new fostering offer.
3. To identify barriers to fostering for potential carers and Cared for Children, and to identify
opportunities for improvement.
4. To formulate recommendations to Cabinet aimed at strengthening Hillingdon’s fostering
provision, thereby improving outcomes for Cared for Children.
Page 6
Summary of recommendations to Cabinet
Through the witness sessions and evidence received during the detailed review, Members have
agreed the following recommendations to Cabinet:
1
Develop an 'Introduction Pack for Children' that provides Cared For Children with
clear, age appropriate, and accessible information to help them feel prepared,
reassured and supported when starting a new placement and, where possible,
during placement moves.
2
Include a 'Voice of the Child' section in the 'All About Me' profiles.
3
Include 'Where Are They Now' stories on the Council's website, where Care
Experienced Young People share their experiences, if they are comfortable and
willing to do so.
4
Review and develop the training programme to introduce specialist Foster Carer
pathways, including pathways for carers specialising in supporting young people
with complex needs. Include young people in co- produced training where
appropriate.
5
Review existing peer support initiatives for both Foster Carers and Cared for
Children, and develop opportunities to strengthen engagement and increase
participation.
Page 7
Background to the review
Context
Foster care plays a vital role in providing a safe, stable and nurturing environment for young
people where they are unable to live with their birth families, and the Council has a statutory duty
to ensure high-quality care and support for both foster carers and young people. Nationally, there
is a shortage of foster carers, and local authorities are facing increasing pressure to meet the
diverse needs of Cared for Children.
Reasons for review
Following discussion with officers it was noted that the Committee had focused on education and
youth services in recent reviews, and that social care functions would benefit from a review on
this occasion.
The fostering service is currently going through major transformation, and is a key project linked
to delivering better outcomes for young people, and financial savings for the Council.
Furthermore, as the new fostering offer has recently been introduced, this was deemed an
appropriate time to conduct this review.
Aims of review
This review aims to assess the effectiveness of the new fostering offer in Hillingdon and explore
opportunities for further improvement through a focus on recruitment and retention; support for
foster carers; and outcomes and experiences of Cared for Children.
The review also aims to assist in recruiting more foster carers; raising awareness of the benefits
of fostering; and highlighting the positive outcomes it can have for young people.
Finally, t he review aims to ensure that the service is responsive, inclusive and aligned with
Corporate Parenting responsibilities so that all Cared for Children can live in stable, loving homes.
Page 8
Evidence & Witness Testimony
Witness sessions
In agreeing the review’s Terms of Reference, the Committee sought to gain an in -depth
understanding of the new fostering offer; how this is being delivered; and how it is being received
by foster ca rers and young people. The evidence received through these witness sessions is
outlined below.
Witness session Theme Witnesses
Witness session 1 –
13 November 2025
Understanding
fostering in
Hillingdon
Director – Children’s Safeguarding and Care
Assistant Director for Care Provision Services
Service Manager – Care Delivery
Virtual School Headteacher
Assistant Director for Education
Fostering & Permanence Panel representative
Witness session 2 a –
16 December 2025
Young
peoples’
experiences &
best practise
6x Cared for Children and Care Experienced Young
People
Children’s Participation Team Manager
Children’s Participation Officer
Fostering & Permanence Panel representative
Witness session 2b –
04 December 2025
Foster carers’
experiences &
best practise
3x Foster carers
Table 1: Witness sessions
Witness session 1
During the first witness session, the Committee met with a wide range of officers who outlined the
background to Hillingdon’s fostering offer, including how it had grown, what it was achieving, and
its ambitions for the future.
The Committee were advised that the fostering offer had been launched in May 2024 with a vision
of improving the recruitment of foster carers and securing better outcomes for Cared for Children.
Since then, interest had surged with enquiries rising by more than 120% compared with the
previous year. Hillingdon was also part of the Foster with West London Hub and had received
some of the highest numbers of enquiries (127) of all eight participating authorities. Over 20% of
enquiries were converted to expressions of interest, while most rejections were due to unsuitable
requests or living arrangements. Officers spoke with clear motivation: they wanted to secure the
best possible carers because this is what young people deserved.
Alongside the Foster with West London Hub, Hillingdon had embraced new recruitment tools
including the Care Friends app, introduced locally in September 2025. The app, originally
launched in Wales , offered small financial incentives to encourage foster carers to refer new
applicants. Hillingdon was leading the West London Hub leaderboard with 18 referrals, and other
Councils had sought advice based on this success. The Committee heard that word- of-mouth
was also an important strategy.
Page 9
Since its launch at a recent appreciation event, the app had contributed to a 30% rise in new
carers. It cast a wider net ; gave existing carers a meaningful role in building the fostering
community; and helped target recruitment for specialist placements. The Committee were
informed that officers worked closely with the Communications team to promote the app and were
already assessing a prospective carer who had been referred through it. Safeguarding remained
paramount and no young person’s details were ever shared, and the assessment process
remained rigorous.
At the time of the witness session , Hillingdon had 78 fostering households with an expected 30
more to be approved before the end of the financial year , which represented an encouraging
improvement. Carers ranged widely in background: 34 were single carers, the rest were couples;
more than half identified as non- white; and ages spanned from 20 to 80, with one carer having
fostered for 40 years. Officers were working to widen the ethnic and religious diversity of carers
to better reflect the borough’s communities and to provide young people with a broader range of
placement options, including specialist and expert homes. 12 connected carers provided family
link fostering for 17 young people, supporting wider sufficiency plans. For the first time, a
parent-and-child foster carer had been recruited, and increasing this capacity was seen as an
important part of future growth.
The Committee were informed that carers could earn up to £1,500 per week for supporting young
people with additional needs, while also receiving annual energy bill contributions, Council Tax
reductions, and reimbursement of Merlin passes to encourage positive, shared experiences.
Training and development formed another central pillar of support. Carers received
trauma-informed training (see Appendix D) and had access to over 100 online and in- person
courses, along with specialist consultations from the MAPS team. The assessment process itself
was long, typically eight to nine months , and intentionally thorough to ensure commitment and
suitability. Throughout this period, training and assessment ran hand- in-hand so that carers
developed the skills needed from the outset. Officers emp hasised the importance of supportive
relationships between carers and their supervising social workers, particularly during difficult
moments or transitions such as when young people move on to a new placement. To strengthen
peer support, the buddy system was being re-launched, and regular events like coffee mornings
helped build a community among carers . The Committee were advised that several newly
approved carers were already going above and beyond for their young people.
Celebration and recognition were also key priorities. Foster carers were honoured at events such
as the annual appreciation awards, where categories included resilience, sibling support,
community impact, exceptional care, and long service awards recognisi ng 10 and 40 years of
commitment. A new bi-monthly ‘Star by Far Award’ had recently been introduced for carers who
made an exceptional difference.
Feedback was constantly gathered from carers, young people and professionals to highlight what
was working well and where further improvements could be made. Officers stressed their
commitment to embedding learning into the fostering offer.
The Committee were informed that e ducation officers from the Virtual School played a vital role
in supporting young people aged 2 –18 who were looked after. Each young person had a
dedicated officer who coordinated their termly Personal Education Plan meetings, bringing
Page 10
together carers, designated teachers, social workers and Virtual School staff to celebrate
progress, understand challenges and set SMART targets. The voice of foster carers was central
in these meetings, which took a holistic approach to stability at home and in school. The Virtual
School also trained designated teachers on the lived experiences of Cared for Children and
provided specialist workshops for foster carers ranging from supporting young people with
challenging behaviours to helping them navigate natural transitions such as key stage and school
changes.
Officers acknowledged the ongoing need to recruit and retain foster carers, as carers naturally
retire or move on. Specialist recruitment for carers able to support adolescents or young people
with additional needs had also become a priority. The wider care offer approach was closely
aligned with Hillingdon’s residential homes, but officers stressed that residential care was
intended as a step, not a destination. The long-term goal was to support young people into family
settings wherever possible, which made the recruitment of specialist carers even more critical.
The Committee was informed of the need for emergency and out -of-hours fostering. As a port
authority, Hillingdon could receive young people arriving at Heathrow at unpredictable times, and
officers were keen to recruit carers able to provide immediate, nurturing care so that no young
person would need to remain at the airport. There was also a need for carers willing to take
placements that arose overnight or at weekends.
To improve placement planning, Hillingdon was piloting a Fostering Placement Coordinator role
to map available carers, young people’s locations, and vacancies across care homes. Officers
were also reviewing the previously piloted Mockingbird scheme, which created hubs of support
through experienced carers, with a view to completing the review before Christmas.
The Committee was reassured that fostering was inclusive: same- sex couples were already
fostering, and one such couple had provided a highly successful home for twins. Officers
described how they supported carers whose circumstances changed, whether single carers
entering new relationships or fostering couples splitting up. Reviews and updated assessments
ensured that any new dynamics were explored with the needs of the young person firmly in focus,
and cases were referred to the Fostering & Permanence Panel where appropriate.
Matching young people with carers was handled with care and sensitivity. ‘All About Me’ profiles
(see Appendix C) helped carers understand the young person, and officers worked to ensure
placements were suitable while challenging assumptions about identity or background.
Sometimes young people thrived in families that did not match their cultural or personal identity
but offered stability through experience and empathy. If a match was uncertain, officers created
transition periods and involved supervising social workers and MAPS in supporting both the young
person and the carer. Where a placement did not work, it was reviewed and alternative matches
were explored.
The Committee were told that although the best place for a young person was with their birth
family or extended network, this was not always possible. Foster care offered young people
stability, a family environment, and continuity in their local communities, from schools and GPs to
friendships and birth- family contact. It was rare for a young person in foster care to have no
contact with their birth family, though sometimes this had to be supervised. This contact was
promoted to retain a sense of identity and belonging for the young person. Over half of Hillingdon’s
Cared for Children were in foster placements. There was no fixed target number of carers , the
Page 11
focus was on having the right carers with the right skills for the right young people. This is why
officers were focusing the recruitment on specialist skills for carers for young people with
additional needs and adolescents. As carers inevitably left or retired, recruitment remained
essential. The greater the pool of carers, the greater the chance of making the best possible
match and giving every young person the stability and support they deserved.
The full account of this session can be found here.
Witness session 2a
During this private witness session, the Committee met with six young people who had experience
of foster care. The young people were aged, 15, 18, 20, 22, 23 and 24. The following is a public
summary of the session.
The Committee heard that some of the young people were still in touch with their foster carers.
One young person told the Committee that their carer had supported them when no one else
would.
The young people described a placement that was not a match based on their LGBTQ+ identity
and had subsequently broken down, and so more training was needed for foster carers in
understanding the young people and their identity.
The Committee were also informed that there needed to be better matching of personality and
ethnicity. When young people we re placed with carers of a different heritage, the carers often
cannot teach the young people about their own heritage.
The young people noted that communication with them needed to be more open. They needed
to know the reasons behind decisions and should have more input into discussions around their
care. One young person advised the Committee of an occasion where they were not informed of
the reasons for a change in placement that happened after they had been in the placement for
five years.
Young people reported that foster carers were often not aware of their mental health need s and
that this often represented an unsupported need. Young people suggested that social workers
often did not understand what being in care is like, and that young people with lots of negative
experiences should be matched with a social worker who ha d relevant experience. While there
was a profile scheme, some of the young people were not aware of this. Previously, young people
had been able to choose between two to three social workers, however this was no longer the
case, in part due to capacity pressures.
The Committee heard occasions of young people being placed separately to their siblings and
that contact with them was limited. Contact should be available to more than just the immediate
family and be open to, for example, step-siblings. It was noted that some foster carers did facilitate
additional family contact.
The young people suggested that if carers wanted the young person to move on, this happened
very quickly, however if the young person want ed to move on, this was either slow or did not
happen at all. Young people also needed to be taught practical skills earlier.
Page 12
The young people suggested that, if they were foster carers, they would invest more time in the
young person’s culture and background and teaching the young person about this. It was
important for foster carers to treat the young people as their own children.
The Committee asked the young people to rate their experience of foster care on a scale of 0-10:
• From age 6-18, 10/10; around the age of 18, 4/10; now, 10/10
• -5
• 7 or 8 as there has been ups and downs
• 7 – overall positive
• 0 – outcomes for this young person could have been better
The Committee heard that there needed to be a more direct line to managers. After their social
worker, young people often did not know a point B contact. The Committee were advised that
young people should have their social worker’s manager’s contact details. The young people also
highlighted high turnover of their allocated social worker, with some having experienced over 20
changes.
The Committee was informed that there were several Children in Care Council groups, including
Talkers, Stepping Up and Stepping Out, for young people to network with each other. The largest
event was KICA (Kids in Care Awards) where the young people were able to feel like a VIP for a
day. There were also movie nights, parties, Pride events, Black History Month events and a 16+
football team. While there was a desire to hold more enrichment events, there were capacity,
timing, and funding constraints. A group chat for just the young people would be helpful as this
would help them to share experiences, learn new things, and ask advice from people their own
age. All young people were care siblings with shared experiences and often understood each
other’s backgrounds where these were not always understood by teachers or professionals.
There were national anonymous call lines available if needed.
The Committee heard young peoples’ suggestions for improving the recruitment process. Carers
needed knowledge and training in how to support the young people, and also how to support
themselves in challenging times or if there was any trauma in the carer ’s background. Foster
carers also needed more information about the young people. While there was an ‘All About Me’
profile, these had previously not been very tailored. Foster carers can judge the young person
based on this form which was not fair on the young person. The Stepping Out Children in Care
Council group had designed the form and these were completed with the young person wherever
possible.
Young people described inconsistencies in pre-placement introductions with the foster family, and
having little choice about their placements. One young person explained that until recently, they
did not know the reason why they went into care – they felt that they should have been allowed
to know the reason. It was suggested that a care package of water, fruit and tissues that is easily
accessible to the young people would be useful at the start of new placements. Carers should
have more experience of working with young people, and the challenges they may face. This
could include volunteer experience prior to becoming a carer.
It was summarised that improvements could include: family placements to keep young people
with their siblings; a focus on prevention rather than cure; explaining to the young people how
foster carers are assessed; carers should have more experience with Cared for Children;
experienced carers should train newer carers, for example through a buddy system or mentoring
Page 13
to share ideas and experiences; and foster carers should be in contact with the young person’s
previous foster carer where possible.
The Committee also heard positive stories from the young people – some noted having good
relationships with their foster carers, and referenced an experience where, although a placement
had broken down, they were able to maintain contact with the carer. The young people explained
that being in foster care allowed young people to experience what family life should be like, and
described an experience whereby the foster family had given them a welcome pack of information
about what it was like to live in the household.
As this was a private session, a full account is restricted to Members only.
Witness session 2b
This private session saw the Committee meet with three foster carers with experience of five
months, five years, and 12 years as foster carers. One was a single carer, and the others were in
fostering couples. The following is a public summary of the session.
The Committee heard that there were currently not enough foster carers, and matching on culture
now appeared to be less common. There were also not enough social workers, and existing social
workers faced heavy burdens and so were often unable to spend sufficient time with each young
person. The carers suggested that each social worker was responsible for too many young people
and that social workers have an extremely difficult job.
The carers described fostering as the most rewarding job but emphasised the importance of
recruiting more carers , and that greater mental health support for young people wa s essential.
Accessing respite was often difficult, even with advance notice.
The Committee were advised that, while the fostering process (see Appendix A) was self -
explanatory, it was very long and approval took several months. It included weekly 1.5 hour
meetings, Zoom meetings and home visits. The duration of the process caused some carers to
think about whether they wanted to continue. The carers emphasised that they do not do it for the
money.
One carer reported that they had not been made aware of all of their young person’s medical
needs, and that it was unclear if the Council was aware of them either. While the carer had raised
concerns and suggested more assessments of the young person’s needs, it had taken several
months to get a response.
The Committee heard that many young people were unable to have contact with their birth
families, and when such contact did occur, it was not always positive. Family contact was typically
held at the Civic Centre within the Family Hub.
The foster carers described positive networking experiences, including meeting other carers at a
recent awards event. There were also parent-baby meet ups at the Civic Centre and play groups
available in the Family Hub. Carers noted that there had previously been a buddy system.
The Committee heard that additional training was necessary to help carers understand different
types of young people and to support the development of specialist placements, such as for young
Page 14
people with complex needs. The carers noted that it can be very challenging for one carer to look
after multiple young people with different additional needs. All foster carers needed trauma-
informed training, supported by additional specialist training where appropriate. This would help
retain more long-term foster carers. The carers also felt that young people should be involved in
the training, noting programmes such as Walking In Our Shoes.
The Committee were advised that themed events could be helpful depending on the needs of the
young people. Although financial pressures were acknowledged, cross country networking could
be beneficial. Carers highlighted young people at risk of entering the criminal justice system or
becoming homeless and said foster carers were often not equipped to address these challenges
without further support. Therefore, more prevention-focused training was required.
One foster carer told the Committee that some information about young people was withheld in
order to secure a placement. Carers also stated that they often lacked information about young
people’s previous placements. ‘All About Me’ profiles should contain all available information as
unknown behavioural challenges could pose risks to other young people in the home. The carers
further suggested that placement breakdowns were more damaging than no placement at all.
The Committee heard that more realistic promotion of fostering was needed, and that highlighting
promising stories would encourage more people to become foster carers and help attract the right
applicants. Young people could be involved in promotion, sharing personal journeys to
demonstrate the positive impact carers can make, such as ‘where are they now’ case studies.
The foster carers outlined several reasons for choosing to foster with Hillingdon rather than an
agency. They explained that their motivation was not financial, that some lived in Hillingdon and
preferred fostering locally. Another carer had initially appr oached Hillingdon because they were
interested in mentoring.
Carers emphasised that foster care was a 24/7 commitment and noted the challenge of balancing
the needs of fostered young people with those of their own children. They also highlighted the
importance of developing the tools needed to set boundaries.
The Committee were informed that, after identifying additional needs of a young person, a query
about backdating additional allowances for the newly identified needs was awaiting a reply.
Carers also needed clearer information about what allowances could be spent on. Some reported
feeling greedy for asking for more resources.
Although a handbook exists, carers said they needed more information about available resources.
One carer had learned about a fostering network only after a placement had begun. Carers
suggested partnering with the YMCA to allow young people to attend for free, which could also
serve as a form of mentoring. Carers also proposed bringing young people together to work on
projects of shared interest such as music which could be capable of generating income.
The Committee heard that there was a need to reach more prospective foster carers and improve
accessibility to fostering information. There was also a need for more guidance about different
types of care (such as fostering without a spare bedroom or as a single carer – see Appendix B),
and more targeted recruitment of specific demographics including LGBTQ+ carers. A ttracting
younger foster carers would also support longevity and help carers relate better to young people.
As this was a private session, a full account is restricted to Members only.
Page 15
Findings, Conclusions & Recommendations
The Committee asked to be kept up to date with statistics, and received the below additional
information:
Number of children in internal foster
placements
74
Average placement duration This data is not currently
available, though it would be
beneficial for future reporting.
Approvals for 2025/26 to date 12 registrations
Deregistration/ resignations for 2025/26 to
date
8
Total number of fostering households 71
Table 2: Fostering statistics (as of February 2026)
Note on considered recommendations
Some suggestions made at the private witness sessions included:
1. Improving advance notice to young people of decisions made
2. Widening family contact, including step-siblings and others
3. Implementing standardised handovers when young people’s allocated social worker
changed
4. Improving support for young people’s wellbeing and transitions to adulthood
Following further investigation, these were discounted as these matters sat with social work teams
rather than the fostering service and so were outside the scope of the review . Foster carers
already received continuity through their own supervising social workers. However, Members
emphasised the important role foster carers play in preparing young people for independence and
agreed that this should be acknowledged.
There were a number of suggestions that were not taken forward as they were already in place.
These included:
1. Standardised pre- placement information for carers – this was largely covered by the
fostering handbook and financial policy
2. Pre-placement introductions – these already occurred where possible, though they were
not possible for emergency placements
3. Matching considerations (identity, culture, household composition, sibling relationships,
proximity to birth family) were already captured within ‘All About Me’ profiles
4. Website content already included strong material on foster carer experiences
5. Representation within the carer cohort was already strong among non- white carers,
LGBTQ+ carers and single carers
Finally, there were some suggestions that were already in progress. These included:
1. Foster carer profiles – these would strengthen information sharing and improve matching
and would be available to young people so they can learn more about potential carers.
These would also enable young people to choose their preferred carer where multipl e
Page 16
suitable matches were available
2. Expanded community engagement to support recruitment – while some outreach methods
may not directl y lead to increased recruitment, it is essential for raising awareness and
challenging misconceptions
The Committee’s final recommendations are outlined below.
Theme 1: Enhancing Information and the Voice of Young People
Findings
The review identified that ‘All About Me’ profiles (which outline background information about the
young person) varied in quality, with some described as inconsistent or not sufficiently
personalised.
The review also highlighted that the Council’s website was static and did not always provide easily
accessible information, with some carers reporting that they were unaware of available networks
or resources when starting a placement.
Conclusions
A standardised information pathway including the voice of the child is required so that carers and
young people are reliably informed, engaged and supported throughout placements.
Therefore, the Committee recommends the following:
1
Develop an 'Introduction Pack for Children' that provides Cared For Children with
clear, age appropriate, and accessible information to help them feel prepared,
reassured and supported when starting a new placement and, where possible,
during placement moves.
2
Include a 'Voice of the Child' section in the 'All About Me' profiles.
3
Include 'Where Are They Now' stories on the Council's website, where Care
Experienced Young People share their experiences, if they are comfortable and
willing to do so.
Theme 2: Developing Specialist Training Pathways for Foster
Carers
Findings
Witnesses identified gaps in training related to mental health, SEND, and identity & inclusion,
which could affect confidence when caring for young people with more complex or varied needs.
At the same time, demand for specialist carers, particularly for a dolescents and those with more
complex needs, continues to grow.
Page 17
Young people highlighted the benefits of co-produced training shaped by lived experience (such
as Walking In Our Shoes). Carers supporting multiple young people shared that additional,
consistent and high-quality training would help them feel more prepared and supported.
Conclusions
Specialist training pathways and sustained development are needed to match the complexity of
young people’s needs and to prevent carer burnout and placement breakdown. Co- produced,
lived-experience-informed training improves relevance, understanding and impact.
Therefore, the Committee recommends the following:
4
Review and develop the training programme to introduce specialist Foster Carer
pathways, including pathways for carers specialising in supporting young people
with complex needs. Include young people in co- produced training where
appropriate.
Theme 3: Strengthening Peer Support to Sustain Foster Placements
Findings
Witnesses shared that peer support such as buddying, Mockingbird constellations and mentoring
was a notable strength, providing practical guidance and emotional reassurance.
Conclusions
Early, preventative support is essential to sustaining placements and reducing breakdowns.
Strong peer networks reduce isolation and spread good practice.
Therefore, the Committee recommends the following:
5
Review existing peer support initiatives for both Foster Carers and Cared for
Children, and develop opportunities to strengthen engagement and increase
participation.
Page 18
Background papers
Key Legislation and Regulations:
• Children Act 1989: outlines the responsibilities of local authorities in providing services for
children in need.
• Children Act 2004: emphasises five key outcomes: being healthy, staying safe, enjoying
and achieving, making a positive contribution, and achieving economic well-being.
• Fostering Services (England) Regulations 2011: outlines the standards and requirements
for fostering services.
• Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (England) Regulations 2010: focuses on the
planning, monitoring and review of children’s placements in foster care.
• Care Leavers (England) Regulations 2010: covers arrangements for children leaving foster
care.
• Children and Social Work Act 2017: establishes seven corporate parenting principles that
local authorities must follow to ensure they act in the best interests of children in their care.
• National Minimum Standards (NMS) : provides best practice guidance for fostering
agencies, setting out the minimum expectations for their services and
operations, according to Simply Fostering.
• Working Together to Safeguard Children 2023: outlines essential guidelines for multi -
agency collaboration to protect and promote the welfare of children.
Page 19
Additional Resources
Meet our foster carers
Read the stories behind some of our amazing foster carers in Hillingdon, available here:
https://www.hillingdon.gov.uk/our-foster-carers
Fostering in Hillingdon | Foster with West London
Available here:
Fostering in Hillingdon | Foster with West London
Key National Helplines
Childline
Free, 24/7,
confidential support
0800 1111
Always Heard (Coram
Voice)
Advocacy for children
in care and care
experienced young
people
0808 800 5792
NYAS (National Youth
Advocacy Service)
Provides advocacy
and legal support
0808 808 1001
The Mix
Support for under 25s
on various issues
0808 808 4994
NSPCC Helpline
For concerns about a
child's safety
0808 800 5000
Page 20
Appendices
Appendix A – The fostering process
Appendix B – Fostering myths and questions
Appendix C – ‘All About Me’ template
Appendix D – Trauma informed practice
The Fostering Process
https://www.hillingdon.gov.uk/article/4756/The-fostering-process
Appendix A
Fostering myths and questions
https://pre.hillingdon.gov.uk/fostering/fostering-myths-questions
Separating the facts from the myths about fostering...
"I would love to foster, but I'm too old."
There is no maximum age to foster with Hillingdon Council - although applicants do need to be
adults with relevant experience of childcare, and fit and healthy enough to look after children and
young people.
"I'm renting at the moment and don't own my home."
You don't have to own your own home to be a foster carer. People who rent, live in housing
association properties or social housing can foster, but you would need to have permission from
your landlord. However, the council cannot accept candidates who have lodgers.
As long as your home is a safe, secure, stable and loving, you can apply to be a foster carer.
Additionally, each child or young person will need their own bedroom, but if you are fostering
siblings they may be able to share a bedroom, depending on their gender or age.
"I don't have a spare bedroom."
If you're interested in fostering babies up to the age of 2, a baby can sleep in a cot placed in the
foster carer's bedroom, as long as there is enough space.
"I don't think I can afford to foster."
Foster carers receive a weekly allowance for each child placed with them, and a fee for their work
as a foster carer; ensuring foster carers will not be out of pocket.
The council's allowances and fees for their foster carers are competitive and higher than the
national minimum.
Those who foster also receive a tax break, called foster care relief, and normally if a person is in
receipt of benefits, this would not be affected by fostering.
"I'm single, can I foster?"
You don't have to be married or have a partner to be considered for fostering. Single men and
women can offer different perspectives on life, and both can be great role models for children and
young people in care.
If you are single, we would look at your support network and (if you are employed) how you would
balance work with fostering.
"I identify as LGBT+. Will I be able to foster?"
Yes, you can foster if you are LGBT+. Your sexual orientation is part of your identity.
We consider the skills and childcare experience of the person - either through their own children,
looking after friends or family members' children, or through work - and the ability to provide a
safe and nurturing home to a child or young person. Those i n foster care have different needs
and challenges, and we welcome diversity among our foster care community.
We recognise the resilience, determination and the challenges that you have overcome. The law
protects you and we welcome you.
Appendix B
"I enjoy my job and may not want to give it up to foster."
Many foster carers also work in some way outside of fostering, and are able to successfully
combine working and fostering. It is also great for children to see parents or carers who are
committed to their work.
The council would need to look at how flexible a person's job is and if they are available for
children after school or during holiday time, as well as their support network.
If a person does wish to look after babies, they would need to be the main foster carer and be at
home full time.
"I would consider fostering, but I'm not a parent."
You don't need to have had children of your own to foster. However, before someone can become
a foster carer, the council would assess the person has relevant childcare experience.
It does not matter if this was gained through caring for their own children, or through their friends
and/or family network, or perhaps through working with children and young people as part of their
job.
The council also provides foster carers in Hillingdon access to a 3-day preparation training course
called Skills to Foster, which covers the practical and specialist skills needed to look after fostered
children.
"English isn't my first language. Am I able to foster?"
Children and young people in foster care come from different backgrounds and many may not
have English as their first language. To foster in Hillingdon, a person needs a good level of spoken
and written English, so they can support a child with their schoolwork, communicate with other
professionals involved in the fostering process, and to be able to make notes and keep records
as part of the role.
"I'd love to foster but I have a disability."
The councils welcome applicants living with a disability. Every person who applies is treated fairly
and equally and the same checks are applied to all applicants.
Checks include a medical check to measure health and fitness, and provide the best standard of
care to a child or young person. What is really important is that a person can provide a safe,
secure and happy home - a person's disability should not be a barrier to fostering.
1 of 6
London Borough of Hillingdon
All About Me
PLEASE ENSURE THIS DOCUMENT REMAINS ANONYMOUS THROUGHOUT
Child/ Young Person’s
Initials
Date of Birth
Gender / Identity
Language spoken:
Religion:
Ethnicity:
Legal Status:
ICS number:
Date Placement Required
by:
Area or Borough placement
is required
Placement requirement indicators - please tick one box:
Reason why the placement
is required and the likely
duration? (including brief
family history /
background)
What is the desired
outcome of the
placement? (Reference the
exit plan)
Fostering
Early Permanence (Foster to Adopt
Residential
Supported Accommodation
52 wk Specialist Residential School
Parent & Child Assessment Unit
Solo / Enhanced
Appendix C
2 of 6
Child/ Young Person’s description of themselves in their own words: N/A
Child or Young Person's Wishes and Feelings: (written by the social worker and/ or the child/ young
person)
Please complete the following:
Child/ Young Person's Special Dietary
Requirements - include allergies etc
What is the model of care requested for the child or young person:
Brief background Information relevant to the placement request and the reason why:
Are there other limitations or restrictions that
need to be considered?
For example:
-Other children in the placement
-DOLS (Deprivation of Liberty) court order in
place
Is there involvement with any other agencies
that providers need to be aware of?
(Police, YJS, Voluntary agencies, MAPS, CAMHS
etc)
Family Time details
3 of 6
Please provide details of any family time- the
schedule, the people that time must be
maintained with, the people for whom time is
restricted with, or that the child or young person
must not be in contact with.
Education
Name and address of educational establishment-
Recently offered school placement at Oakwood school
Include any individual contact details - name & phone number
Year Group – this information must be provided
Is the child or young person experiencing any of the following difficulties in education, or receiving any of
the following support? Please tick any that apply
Not feeling able to engage with education
Currently excluded
At risk of exclusion
Has an EHCP
Has a Behaviour Support Plan
Absent or not attending school
Can the young person travel independently?
(if the young person needs to be transported to school please indicate any
specific needs associated with transport)
Please provide any brief additional information here:
Long term medical
conditions
Please include
description and main
symptoms, not just
the name of condition.
Medication
(Name, dosage, is it
self-administered?
Include any allergies
to medication)
Substance or Alcohol
Use - include smoking.
If yes, include details.
Emotional Wellbeing
4 of 6
Mental Health
Conditions
Please include
information about any
self-harm or suicidal
thoughts
Eating Disorders
Please give details,
including any historic
or ongoing treatment
ADHD/Autism
Please give details of
diagnosis or stage of
investigation, also any
ongoing support from
partner agencies.
Attachment disorder
of any type.
Is the young person
sexually active in their
relationships and/ or
at risk of pregnancy?
Any brief additional Information
Disability
Does the child or young
person have a
disability?
Please provide details,
including if or how this
may impact on the
child’s day to day life. -
Are there any physical
needs, mobility issues,
environmental
adaptations that are
needed.
Needs and behaviours
5 of 6
Please provide details about the child/ young person’s day to day behaviour within the context of their
needs, challenges, triggers and what works to support them.
Possible
Behavioural
responses/
challenges (i.e.,
verbal
aggression,
physical
aggression,
sexualised
behaviour,
bullying others,
bedwetting etc)
Possible Underlying
Needs
(What might the child/
YP be trying to
communicate or elicit
from this behaviour?
What might be driving
this behaviour?)
What might be the impact
of change on the child or
young person?
What works best in supporting
the child/ young person?
Missing/Community Vulnerability
Please provide details where applicable
Missing/absconding
Negative peers
association
Road safety
Personal safety
Vulnerable to
exploitation
6 of 6
Has a risk assessment
been carried out?
Include details.
Honour based violence
Suspicion of trafficking
Any other relevant information (such as additional risks not covered elsewhere)
Social Worker Name and Signature:
Manager's Name and Signature:
Date completed:
Briefing Note
Trauma-Informed Practice in Social Work and Care
In Hillingdon we approach Trauma Informed Practice (TIP) in two related ways. The
Social Workers who are completing the assessments and plans are fully trained n
Trauma Informed Practice and those providing care (residential and Foster Care) are
fully trained in P .A.C.E. approach that is closely linked with T I P.
This briefing provides a brief description of both highlight the benefits to the children’s
outcomes and highlights how this supports our commitment to delivering the Care
Offer to our children.
What is Trauma-Informed Practice?
Trauma-Informed Practice (TIP) is an approach that recognises the impact of trauma on
a person’s life and behaviour. Instead of asking “What’s wrong with this child?”, it asks
“What has this child experienced?”. Trauma can result from abuse, neglect, loss, or
violence, and it affects emotional regulation, relationships, and development.
TIP focuses on:
• Understanding trauma and its effects.
• Creating safety and trust in relationships.
• Avoiding re-traumatisation.
• Empowering children and families through choice and collaboration.
What is PACE?
PACE stands for Playfulness, Acceptance, Curiosity, and Empathy. It is a therapeutic
parenting approach developed by Dr Dan Hughes, designed to help carers build strong,
trusting relationships with children who have experienced trauma.
How PACE links to Trauma-Informed Practice:
• Both approaches start from understanding trauma and its impact.
• PACE gives carers practical tools to respond in ways that promote emotional
safety and connection.
• It helps carers move away from punitive responses and towards curiosity and
empathy, which are core principles of TIP .
Appendix D
How is it Embedded in Practice?
• Social Work: Practitioners use trauma-informed approaches in social work
assessments, planning, direct work and observations. This includes building
trust, reducing stress, and supporting emotional regulation whilst creating
informed, relevant plans than meet the needs of our children.
• Foster Carer Training: Carers, trough PACE, learn how trauma shapes behaviour
and how to respond with empathy rather than punishment. Training covers:
o Predictable routines.
o Calm, supportive communication.
o Techniques to help children manage emotions.
• Staff Development: All staff receive training to understand trauma’s impact on
children and themselves, reducing burnout and improving care consistency.
Why we are rolling out PACE to foster carers and residential staff:
• Children in care often struggle with trust and emotional regulation due to past
trauma.
• PACE equips carers and staff to respond calmly and therapeutically, reducing
placement breakdowns.
• It supports children’s recovery, resilience, and long-term wellbeing by creating
nurturing, predictable environments.
• Children in care often struggle with trust, emotional regulation, and behaviour
because of past trauma. PACE gives carers practical tools to respond calmly and
compassionately, rather than with punishment or frustration. This creates a safe,
nurturing environment where children can heal and grow.
How PACE and TIP promote a Consistent Care Offer
• Shared Language and Approach: When both foster carers and residential staff
use PACE, children experience the same style of care wherever they are. This
consistency reduces confusion and anxiety and supports the move from
residential homes into family based environment in Foster Care
• Smooth Transitions: Moving between residential settings and foster care can be
stressful and often a difficult step for our children. A common approach (PACE)
means children don’t have to “start over” with new rules, expectations,
communication methods and behaviour management.
• Consistent Standards: PACE sets a clear standard for how adults interact with
children—always with empathy, curiosity, and acceptance —so care feels
predictable and supportive.
Why This Leads to Better Outcomes
• Emotional Safety: Children feel understood and valued, which builds trust.
• Improved Behaviour: When carers respond with curiosity instead of criticism,
children learn to manage emotions better.
• Stronger Relationships: Consistent, nurturing care helps children form secure
attachments.
• Long-Term Resilience: These experiences support mental health and
development into adulthood.
In short, PACE it’s a way of working that ensures every child in care receives the
same compassionate, trauma-informed support, no matter where they live. This
consistency is key to helping children recover from trauma and thrive.
Alex Coman
08 Jan 2026
Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.