E-Petitions

Wednesday 5th February 2025 • View on LB Hillingdon’s website

Meeting documents

👥 Attendance details 📄 Agenda frontsheet PDF 341 KB 📦 Agenda reports pack PDF 3 MB 📝 Printed minutes PDF 335 KB

Read the text of: Agenda frontsheet PDF 341 KB (3 pages)

Lloyd White Head of Democratic Services London Borough of Hillingdon, Phase II, Civic Centre, High Street, Uxbridge, UB8 1UW Putting our residents first Petition Hearing - Cabinet Member for Planning, Housing & Growth Cabinet Member hearing the petition(s): Councillor Steve Tuckwell, Cabinet Member for Planning, Housing & Growth How the hearing works: The petition organiser (or his/her nominee) can address the Cabinet Member for a short time and in turn the Cabinet Member may also ask questions. Local ward councillors are invited to these hearings and may also be in attendance. After hearing all the views expressed, the Cabinet Member will make a formal decision. This decision will be published and sent to the petition organisers shortly after the meeting confirming the action to be taken by the Council. Published: Tuesday 28 January 2025 Contact: Anisha Teji, Democratic Services Tel: 01895 277655 Email: ateji@hillingdon.gov.uk Date: WEDNESDAY 5 FEBRUARY 2025 Time: 6.00 PM (see agenda for specific petition start times) Venue: COMMITTEE ROOM 5 - CIVIC CENTRE Meeting Details: The public and press are welcome to attend and observe the meeting. For safety and accessibility, security measures will be conducted, including searches of individuals and their belongings. Attendees must also provide satisfactory proof of identity upon arrival. Refusal to comply with these requirements will result in non-admittance. This meeting may be broadcast on the Council’s YouTube channel. You can also view this agenda online at www.hillingdon.gov.uk A Useful information for petitioners attending Travel and parking Bus routes 427, U1, U3, U4 and U7 all stop at the Civic Centre. Uxbridge underground station, with the Piccadilly and Metropolitan lines, is a short walk away. Limited parking is available at the Civic Centre. For details on availability and how to book a parking space, please contact Democratic Services. Please enter via main reception and visit the security desk to sign-in and collect a visitor’s pass. You will then be directed to the Committee Room. Accessibility For accessibility options regarding this agenda please contact Democratic Services. For those hard of hearing an Induction Loop System is available for use in the various meeting rooms. Attending, reporting and filming of meetings For the public part of this meeting, residents and the media are welcomed to attend, and if they wish, report on it, broadcast, record or film proceedings as long as it does not disrupt proceedings. It is recommended to give advance notice to ensure any particular requirements can be met. The Council will provide a seating area for residents/public, an area for the media and high speed WiFi access to all attending. The officer shown on the front of this agenda should be contacted for further information and will be available at the meeting to assist if required. Kindly ensure all mobile or similar devices on silent mode. Please note that the Council may also record or film this meeting and publish this online. Emergency procedures If there is a FIRE, you will hear a continuous alarm. Please follow the signs to the nearest FIRE EXIT and assemble on the Civic Centre forecourt. Lifts must not be used unless instructed by a Fire Marshal or Security Officer. In the event of a SECURITY INCIDENT, follow instructions issued via the tannoy, a Fire Marshal or a Security Officer. Those unable to evacuate using the stairs, should make their way to the signed refuge locations. Agenda 1 Declarations of interest in matters coming before this meeting 2 To confirm that the business of the meeting will take place in public 3 To consider the report of the officers on the following petitions received: Start Time Title of Report Ward Page 4 6pm Derwent Avenue, Ickenham - Petition Requesting The Installation Of 'Speed Bumps' For Enhanced Safety Ickenham & South Harefield 1 - 8 5 6.15pm Sunnydene Avenue, Ruilsip Manor - Petition Requesting Traffic Calming Measures Ruislip Manor 9 - 14 6 6.30pm Gordon Road, Yiewsley - Petition Requesting Restricted Access To The Road At The Start And End Of The School Day Yiewsley 15 - 22 7 6.45pm Church Road, West Drayton - Petition Requesting The Installation Of 'Speed Bumps' To Reduce The Speed Of Traffic West Drayton 23 - 30

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

Read the text of: Printed minutes PDF 335 KB (6 pages)

Minutes PETITION HEARING - CABINET MEMBER FOR PLANNING, HOUSING & GROWTH 5 February 2025 Meeting held at Committee Room 5 - Civic Centre Committee Members Present: Councillors Steve Tuckwell – Cabinet Member for Planning, Housing & Growth and Ward councillor for South Ruislip Also Present: Councillor Eddie Lavery – Ward Councillor for Ickenham & South Harefield Councillor Naser Mohammed Abby – Ward Councillor for Yiewsley Councillor Jan Sweeting - Ward Councillor for West Drayton Councillor Scott Farley - Ward Councillor for West Drayton Councillor Mohammed Shofiul Islam - Ward Councillor for West Drayton LBH Officers Present: Anisha Teji - Senior Democratic Services Officer David Knowles - Head of Transportation Planning and Sustainable Growth 1. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST IN MATTERS COMING BEFORE THIS MEETING (Agenda Item 1) None. 2. TO CONSIDER THE REPORT OF THE OFFICERS ON THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS RECEIVED: (Agenda Item 3) 3. TO CONFIRM THAT THE BUSINESS OF THE MEETING WILL TAKE PLACE IN PUBLIC (Agenda Item 2) It was confirmed that the meeting was held in Part I. 4. DERWENT AVENUE, ICKENHAM - PETITION REQUESTING THE INSTALLATION OF 'SPEED BUMPS' FOR ENHANCED SAFETY (Agenda Item 4) The Cabinet Member considered an e -petition signed by residents of Derwent Avenue, requesting urgent traffic calming measures due to persistent speeding issues. The lead petitioner was not in attendanc e however submitted a written representation highlighting the following points:  Residents reported that speeding was particularly severe during morning and evening peak hours, with the road being used as a cut -through by motorists seeking to avoid congestion.  Residents were extremely concerned about pedestrian and road safety.  Concerns were raised regarding a lack of speed limit signage, making it unclear for drivers.  There was an absence of any traffic -calming infrastructure such as speed bumps or raised crossings.  There was an increased risk to children, elderly residents and pedestrians, particularly near intersections.  Residents requested the installation of speed tables to slow down traffic, additional road signage indicating speed limits and pedestrian crossings at key points. Ward Councillor Eddie Lavery raised concerns with the Cabinet Member about speeding near multiple schools, particularly dur ing mornings and evenings. He emphasised the need for speed surveys to determine appropriate me asures, especially near the sharp bend by the roundabout. He also referenced the fact that the e -petition with 21 signatures included only a few signatories from residents of Derwent Avenue, with the remainder coming from the wider borough, suggesting that should further proposals arise from further study, a consultation to assess views across the area would ultimately be needed to ensure that any proposals were a cceptable to a majority of the residents most affected, especially those actually living in the road. The Cabinet Member acknowledged the concerns and highlighted the importance of accurate data collection before implementing measures; such data would then inform the next steps, which he would consider with Ward Councillors and Officers. The Cabinet Member also stressed to all petitioners this evening the fact that the Police remain the only body with powers of enforcement and whilst the Council will seek to do what is viable and well supported, they cannot match the Police’s enforcement powers In considering the matters, the Cabinet Member made the following decisions. RESOLVED: That the Cabinet Member: 1. Met with petitioners and listened to their request for ‘speed bumps’ on Derwent Avenue, Ickenham; and 2. Decided that officers should commi ssion independent 24/7 speed and traffic surveys on Derwent Avenue at locations agreed with petitioners and Ward Councillors. Reasons for decisions The Pe tition Hearing provided a valuable opportunity to hear directly from the petitioners of their concerns and suggestions. Alternative options considered / risk management: None at this stage. 5. SUNNYDENE AVENUE, RUILSIP MANOR - PETITION REQUESTING TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES (Agenda Item 5) The lead petitioner was in attendance and addressed the Cabinet Member, highlighting the following points:  Sunnydene Avenue was frequently used as a cut -through, resulting in high - speed traffic, particularly during peak hours.  The road had narrow pavements, which posed a safety risk for p edestrians, including children and elderly residents, who were often forced to walk on the road.  Drivers frequently ignored existing road signs, leading to reckless driving.  The road ran parallel to Victoria Avenue, which had busy shops, Ruislip Manor Underground Station, and various local amenities.  A number of traffic calming measures were requested, including the installation of speed humps and additional si gnage and road markings to improve driver awareness of pedestrians. The Cabinet Member informed petitioners that he was familiar with Sunnydene Avenue and the surrounding area. It was noted that similar concerns had been raised in previous years, and a new traffic survey would be necessary to reassess the situation. If independent 24/7 traffic and speed survey results confirm persistent speeding issues, appropriate measures will be explored to enhance safety. RESOLVED: That the Cabinet Member: 1. Met wi th petitioners and listens to their request for the Council to implement traffic calming measur es in Sunnydene Avenue, Ruislip Manor; and 2. Confirmed that officers would commission independent 24/7 traffic and speed surveys on Sunnydene Avenue and other possible nearby roads at locations as agreed with petitioners and Ward Councillors. Reasons for decisions The Petition Hearing provided a valuable opportunity to hear directly from the petitioners of their concerns and suggestions. Alternative options considered / risk management: None at this stage. 6. GORDON ROAD, YIEWSLEY - PETITION REQUESTING RESTRICTED ACCESS TO THE ROAD AT THE START AND END OF THE SCHOOL DAY (Agenda Item 6) The lead petitioner was in attendance and addressed the Cabinet Member, highlighting the following points:  Gordon Road experienced high vehicle volumes during school drop-off and pick- up times.  Chaotic traffic conditions frequently led to near misses and accidents.  A recent incident involving a drive r losing control underscored the urgency of intervention.  A number of traffic management measu res were requested, including introducing restrictions on vehicle access during school hours and implementing a permit-based system allowing only residents and disabled users to access the road during peak times. Ward Councillor Naser Mohammed Abby raise d concerns about speeding on Gordon Road, which leads to a primary school. He referenced that his petition benefited from nearly 400 signatures, proposing traffi c restrictions while allowing exemptions for school drop-offs, staff, and disabled users, although he accepted when pointed out that only a small handful of signatures were from residents of Gordon Road, whose views on any proposals would clearly be paramount. Cllr Abby highlighted a recent incident where a driver lost control, crashing through a fence and nearly into an elderly resident’s living room. He also noted issues with parents arriving late, blocking driveways, and obstructing emergency vehicles. The petition aims to improve traffic control and prevent further risks to locals. The Cabinet Member informed petitioners that school -related traffic issues were a recurring concern across the borough. A traffic survey would be conducted, and further discussions would take place regarding the feasibility of restrictions. Consultation with local schools, parents, and law enforcement would be considered to explore alternative traffic management strategies. Advised ward councillor Abby to report to safer neighbourhood team. The Cabinet Member also encouraged ward councillor Abby to report these concer ns directly to the Police Safer Neighbourhood team. RESOLVED: That the Cabinet Member: 1. Met with petitioners and listened to their request for the Council to restrict access to Gordon Road at the start and end of the school day. 2. Requested officers to c ommission independent traffic surveys in an area agreed with Ward Councillors and video surveys for pedestrian movements in Gordon Road. 3. Requested Ward Councill ors to encourage Rabbsfarm School to move forward with the work already co -developed with the C ouncil’s School Travel and Road Safety Team, including the ‘Living Streets WOW’ challenge referenced in the report. Reasons for decisions The Petition Hearing provided a valuable opportunity to hear directly from the petitioners about their concerns and suggestions. Alternative options considered / risk management: None at this stage. 7. CHURCH ROAD, WEST DRAYTON - PETITION REQUESTING THE INSTALLATION OF 'SPEED BUMPS' TO REDUCE THE SPEED OF TRAFFIC (Agenda Item 7) The lead petitioner was in attendance and addressed the Cabinet Member, highlighting the following points:  Church Road had experienced multiple accidents and near -misses, including an incident where a child was struck by a vehicle.  A previous petition for a zeb ra crossing had been stalled due to objections from certain residents.  Increased vehicular traffic in recent years had exacerbated the problem.  A number of tra ffic calming measures were requested, including the installation of speed bumps and a re-evaluation of the previous zebra crossing proposal in light of recent incidents. Ward Councillor Mohammed Shofiul Islam raised concerns with the Cabinet Member about speeding near Laurel Lane Primary School, St. Martin’s, and St. Catherine’s, emphasising the risk to residents and children walking to school. Ward Councillor Jan Sweeting attended in support of petitioners, stressing the need for safety measures on Church Road. She highlighted its multiple connecting roads and its link to Iver and the motorway, m aking it a hotspot for speeding, particularly by large industrial trucks. A petition was previously submitted by St. Martin’s. Some years ago, a separate petition was previously submitted by St. Martin’s seeking the introduction of a new Zebra Crossing, b ut it was understood that at the time there proved to be difficulty in securing accommodation between the opposing desires of those who wanted the new crossing a nd those concerned at the loss of disabled parking that this would have entailed. Ward Councillor Scott Farley was in attendance in support of the petitioners and his points were covered by both Councillors Sweeting and Islam. The Cabinet Member informed petitioners that Church Road had been the subject of multiple traffic safety concerns in pas t meetings. A comprehensive traffic survey would be conducted to assess road conditions and driver behaviour. Further engagement with residents, road safety offi cers, and the Highways Department would be necessary before deciding on interventions. RESOLVED: That the Cabinet Member: 1. Met with petitioners and listened to their concerns over traffic speeds and their request for speed bumps on Church Road, West Drayton. 2. Decided that officers should commission independent 24/7 speed and traffic surveys on Church Road, West Drayton, at locations agreed with petitioners and Ward Councillors. 3. Decided that officers in the highways team should investigate the area around the barrier and effectively analyse how the gate could be more robust and prevent the gate from being Vandalised. Reasons for decisions The Petition Hearing provided a valuable opportunity to hear directly from the petitioners about their concerns and suggestions. Alternative options considered / risk management None at this stage. The meeting, which commenced at 6.00 pm, closed at 7.16 pm. These are the minutes of the above meeting. For more information on any of the resolutions please contact Demcoratic Services on 01895 260636. Circulation of these minutes is to Councillors, Officers, the Press and Members of the Public.

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

Attendance

Present: David Knowles, Councillor Steve Tuckwell

Agenda

1. Declarations of interest in matters coming before this meeting

None.

2. To consider the report of the officers on the following petitions received:

3. To confirm that the business of the meeting will take place in public

It was confirmed that the meeting was held in Part I.

4. Derwent Avenue, Ickenham - Petition Requesting The Installation Of 'Speed Bumps' For Enhanced Safety PDF 415 KB

The Cabinet Member considered an e-petition signed by residents of Derwent Avenue, requesting urgent traffic calming measures due to persistent speeding issues. The lead petitioner was not in attendance however submitted a written representation highlighting the following points: · Residents reported that speeding was particularly severe during morning and evening peak hours, with the road being used as a cut-through by motorists seeking to avoid congestion. · Residents were extremely concerned about pedestrian and road safety. · Concerns were raised regarding a lack of speed limit signage, making it unclear for drivers. · There was an absence of any traffic-calming infrastructure such as speed bumps or raised crossings. · There was an increased risk to children, elderly residents and pedestrians, particularly near intersections. · Residents requested the installation of speed tables to slow down traffic, additional road signage indicating speed limits and pedestrian crossings at key points . Ward Councillor Eddie Lavery raised concerns with the Cabinet Member about speeding near multiple schools, particularly during mornings and evenings. He emphasised the need for speed surveys to determine appropriate measures, especially near the sharp bend by the roundabout. He also referenced the fact that the e-petition with 21 signatures included only a few signatories from residents of Derwent Avenue, with the remainder coming from the wider borough, suggesting that should further proposals arise from further study, a consultation to assess views across the area would ultimately be needed to ensure that any proposals were acceptable to a majority of the residents most affected, especially those actually living in the road. The Cabinet Member acknowledged the concerns and highlighted the importance of accurate data collection before implementing measures; such data would then inform the next steps, which he would consider with Ward Councillors and Officers. The Cabinet Member also stressed to all petitioners this evening the fact that the Police remain the only body with powers of enforcement and whilst the Council will seek to do what is viable and well supported, they cannot match the Police’s enforcement powers In considering the matters, the Cabinet Member made the following decisions. RESOLVED: That the Cabinet Member: 1. Met with petitioners and listened to their request for ‘speed bumps’ on Derwent Avenue, Ickenham; and 2. Decided that officers should commission independent 24/7 speed and traffic surveys on Derwent Avenue at locations agreed with petitioners and Ward Councillors. Reasons for decisions The Petition Hearing provided a valuable opportunity to hear directly from the petitioners of their concerns and suggestions. Alternative options considered / risk management: None at this stage.

📄 Derwent Avenue, Ickenham - Petition Requesting The Installation Of 'Speed Bumps' For Enhanced Safety PDF 415 KB

Read the text of this document (5 pages)

Cabinet Member Petition Hearing – 5 February 2025 Part 1 Public DERWENT AVENUE, ICKENHAM – PETITION REQUESTING THE INSTALLATION OF ‘SPEED BUMPS’ FOR ENHANCED SAFETY Cabinet Member & Portfolio Cllr Steve Tuckwell, Cabinet Member for Planning, Housing & Growth Responsible Officer Karrie Whelan - Corporate Director Place Report Author & Directorate Steven Austin – Place Directorate Papers with report Appendix A – Location Plan HEADLINES Summary To inform the Cabinet Member that a petition has been received requesting ‘speed bumps’ on Derwent Avenue, Ickenham. Putting our Residents First Delivering on the Council Strategy 2022-2026 This report supports our ambition for residents / the Council of: Live in good quality, affordable homes in connected communities This report supports our commitments to residents of: Safe and Strong Communities The request can be considered as part of the Council’s annual programme for road safety measures. Financial Cost Should speed and traffic surveys be commissioned, costs will be c.£85 per location, managed within existing Transportation Services revenue budgets. Select Committee Corporate Resources & Infrastructure Select Committee. Ward(s) Ickenham and South Harefield RECOMMENDATIONS That the Cabinet Member: 1) Meets with petitioners and listens to their request for ‘speed bumps’ on Derwent Avenue, Ickenham; and 2) Also, subject to the outcome of the above, decided if officers should commission independent 24/7 speed and traffic surveys on Derwent Avenue at locations agreed with petitioners and Ward Councillors. Cabinet Member Petition Hearing – 5 February 2025 Part 1 Public Reasons for recommendations The Petition Hearing will provide a valuable opportunity to hear directly fr om the petitioners regarding their concerns and suggestions. Alternative options considered / risk management None at this stage. Select Committee comments None at this stage. SUPPORTING INFORMATION 1. A petition with 21 signatures has been submitted to the Counci l by residents of which, five live on Derwent Avenue. The petition is signed under the following heading: “Installation of speed bumps on Derwent Avenue – Ickenham. The lead petitioner has helpfully provided the following additional information: “We the undersigned petition Hillingdon Council for the installation of traffic calming measures, specifically speed bumps, along Derwent Avenue, Ickenham. The increasing traffic volume and speed have been a significant safety concern for our community, necessitating immediate action. Derwent Avenue is used as a shortcut between Ruislip and Ickenham/ Uxbridge by most SatNav users, especially to reach Vyners school one minute faster, instead of continuing on Breakspear Road South and Swakeleys Road, which will be much safer for all residents living around Derwent Avenue. This road becomes particularly unsafe on weekdays in the morning from 07.30 to 9.00 and middle of afternoon, matching school times. The traffic volume is excessive during this above - mentioned period with a continuous flow of hurry drivers, far over 30 miles per hour most of the time. There are seven roads crossing this avenue. 2. Derwent Avenue is a mainly residential road close to Ickenham Village Centre with its shops and other local amenities. The average width of the carriageway is approximately six meters and is bounded on both sides by a grass verge and then footways. 3. From officers’ site investigations, some on -street parking took place at various locations along the road on alternate sides of the carriageway. 4. Officers have interrogated the most recent police recorded collision data for the last five years and there a re no recorded incidents on Derwent Avenue. However, in light of the petition, it is recommended that the Cabinet Member may wish to hear the testimony from petitioners and their Ward Councillors to under stand in greater detail their road safety concerns. Cabinet Member Petition Hearing – 5 February 2025 Part 1 Public 5. Although the petition mentions so called ‘speed bumps’ and if by these petitioners are thinking of the older type of round -topped narrow transverse road humps – often known colloquially in the past as ‘sleeping policemen’ – then the Cabinet Member will be aware that the vast majority of councils, Hillingdon include d, have not introduced these particular measures for many years. 6. Having said that, various forms of traffic calming features could be considered , where appropriate, if there is a case for them. However, petitioners may wish to consider that such features can sometimes have the unintended effect of increasing noise from passing traffic, notably skip lorries and similar commercial vehicles which may carry loose loads. 7. Horizontal traffic calming measures , such as c hicanes and similar measures , are seldom suitable for the average residential road; they can cause loss of parking , are visually intrusive and are less effective at actually reducing the speeds of cars and vans in particular. The Cabinet Member may wish to advise the petitioners to consider these factors in their own deliberations and it should be noted that any form of physical measures can prove to be ‘popular’ and ‘unpopular’ in equal measures. 8. Subject to the above, the Cabinet Member may be minded to commission independent 24/7 speed and traffic surveys on Derwent Avenue at locations agreed with petitioners and Ward Councillors. 9. As the Cabinet Member will be aware , independent traffic surveys are a reliable and well - established means to understand the real situation on the ground. These surveys generally use specialist equipment, including pneumatic tubes which are mounted temporarily on the road surface, fitted transversely across the whole width of the carriageway. These devices are installed for a period of at least a week or ten days and monitor traffic movements on a ’24/7’ basis. The d iscreet equipment is sufficiently sophisticated such that not only can it record traffic speeds at any given time, but also records the size and type of vehicles, from motorcycles to large multi-axel lorries. 10. The Cabinet Member will be interested to know that Vyners School, mentioned by petitioners, has been working closely with the Council’s School Travel and Road Safety (STARS) Team. The school started working with the Council on their School Travel Plan (STP) in 2021 and, with the support of the STP lead and a hard working team of pupils who have signed up to be ‘Pioneer Ambassadors’, they achieved Bronze accreditation in 2022/23. Their continued efforts helped them achieve Gold statues in late 2023. 11. Over the last couple of years, the school have undertaken many projects but some notable ones to mention are measuring air quality around the school, running road safety awareness campaigns, an active travel competition called ‘The Golden Lock’, a Road Safety obstacle course, and promoting the walking zone map. At the last ‘Dragon’s Den’ event, the school secured £700 towards podcast equipment which they will use to produce a podcast to make parents aware of their behaviour and raise awareness of road safety issues. 12. It is also recommended that, if they have not already done so, residents raise their concerns directly with the Metropolitan Police because they alone have the necessary powers to tackle speeding and inconsiderate driving in general (if this is the case in Derwent Avenue) Cabinet Member Petition Hearing – 5 February 2025 Part 1 Public through enforcement. Physical traffic calmin g can be an effective tool , but, as mentioned previously, it can also have unwelcome side effects including an increase in noise caused by traffic passing through, such as skip lorries and larger vehicles. Financial Implications Subject to the outcome of discussion with petitioners, the Cabinet Member may request the commissioning of speed and traffic surveys. The current cost of these is c.£85 per location, with spend managed through the existing Transportation revenue budgets. RESIDENT BENEFIT & CONSULTATION The benefit or impact upon Hillingdon residents, service users and communities To allow the Cabinet Member to consider the petitioners’ request. Consultation & Engagement carried out (or required) None at this stage. CORPORATE CONSIDERATIONS Corporate Finance Corporate Finance has reviewed the recommendations to this report and concurs with the financial implications as set out above. Legal There are no legal impediments to following the recommendation set out within the report. Comments from other relevant service areas None at this stage. BACKGROUND PAPERS Individual consultation responses TITLE OF ANY APPENDICES Appendix A - Location Plan Cabinet Member Petition Hearing – 5 February 2025 Part 1 Public

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

📄 Derwent Avenue , item 4. PDF 160 KB

5. Sunnydene Avenue, Ruilsip Manor - Petition Requesting Traffic Calming Measures PDF 320 KB

The lead petitioner was in attendance and addressed the Cabinet Member, highlighting the following points: · Sunnydene Avenue was frequently used as a cut-through, resulting in high-speed traffic, particularly during peak hours. · The road had narrow pavements, which posed a safety risk for pedestrians, including children and elderly residents, who were often forced to walk on the road. · Drivers frequently ignored existing road signs, leading to reckless driving. · The road ran parallel to Victoria Avenue, which had busy shops, Ruislip Manor Underground Station, and various local amenities. · A number of traffic calming measures were requested , including the installation of speed humps and additional signage and road markings to improve driver awareness of pedestrians. The Cabinet Member informed petitioners that he was familiar with Sunnydene Avenue and the surrounding area. It was noted that similar concerns had been raised in previous years, and a new traffic survey would be necessary to reassess the situation. If independent 24/7 traffic and speed survey results confirm persistent speeding issues, appropriate measures will be explored to enhance safety. R ESOLVED : That the Cabinet Member: 1. M e t with petitioners and listens to their request for the Council to implement traffic calming measures in Sunnydene Avenue, Ruislip Manor; and 2. Confirmed that officers would commission independent 24/7 traffic and speed surveys on Sunnydene Avenue and other possible nearby roads at locations as agreed with petitioners and Ward Councillors. Reasons for decision s The Petition Hearing provided a valuable opportunity to hear directly from the petitioners of their concerns and suggestions. Alternative options considered / risk management: None at this stage.

📄 Sunnydene Avenue, Ruilsip Manor - Petition Requesting Traffic Calming Measures PDF 320 KB

Read the text of this document (4 pages)

Cabinet Member Petition Hearing – 5 February 2025 Part 1 Public SUNNYDENE AVENUE, RUILSIP MANOR – PETITION REQUESTING TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES Cabinet Member & Portfolio Cllr Steve Tuckwell, Cabinet Member for Planning, Housing & Growth Responsible Officer Karrie Whelan - Corporate Director Place Report Author & Directorate Steven Austin – Place Directorate Papers with report Appendix A - Location Plan HEADLINES Summary To inform the Cabinet Member that a petition has been received asking for traffic calming measures in Sunnydene Avenue, Ruislip Manor. Putting our Residents First Delivering on the Council Strategy 2022-2026 This report supports our ambition for residents / the Council of: Live in good quality, affordable homes in connected communities This report supports our commitments to residents of: Safe and Strong Communities The request can be considered as part of the Council’s annual programme for road safety measures. Financial Cost Should speed and traffic surveys be commissioned, costs will be c.£85 per location, managed within existing Transportation Services revenue budgets. Select Committee Corporate Resources & Infrastructure Select Committee. Ward(s) Ruislip Manor RECOMMENDATIONS That the Cabinet Member: 1) meets with petitioners and listens to their request for the Council to imp lement traffic calming measures in Sunnydene Avenue, Ruislip Manor; and 2) subject to the outcome of the above, decides if officers should commission independent 24/7 traffic and speed surveys on Sunnydene Avenue and other possible nearby roads at locations agreed with petitioners and Ward Councillors. Cabinet Member Petition Hearing – 5 February 2025 Part 1 Public Reasons for recommendations The Petition Hearing will provide a valuable opportunity to hear directly fr om the petitioners regarding their concerns and suggestions. Alternative options considered / risk management None at this stage. Select Committee comments None at this stage. SUPPORTING INFORMATION 1. A petition with 26 signatures from residents, has been submitted to the Council signed under the following heading: “Installation of at least two traffic calming humps in Sunnydene Avenue, Ruislip Manor” In an accompanying statement, petitioners have helpfully outlined their desired outcomes as: “That at least two traffic calming humps be installed in Sunnydene Avenue, Ruislip Manor to prevent speeding, as the road is used as a cut-through when Ruislip Manor High Street is congested. The pavements are very narrow and often children walking to/from school or using Shenley Park have to step into the road to allow a pram or bicycle to pass. The speed that delivery vans and motorbikes drive down the road is dangerous.”. 2. Sunnydene Avenue is a mainly residential road with the majority of the properties appearing to have access to off-street parking provision. The width of the carriageway is approximately 6 metres and is bounded on both sides by a wide footway averaging around 1.4 metres wide. Although many properties appear to benefit from off -street parking, from officers’ site observations, the road appeared to be heavily parked. A location plan is attached as Appendix A. 3. Sunnydene Avenue runs parallel to Victoria Avenue with its busy shops, Ruislip Manor underground station and many other local amenities. 4. There are existing ‘at any time’ waiting restrictions at the junctions with Cornwall Road and Shenley Avenue with the rest of the road benefiting from a Monday to Friday 10 -11am and 4-5pm parking prohibition. During a site visit made by officers outside of these times, it was noted that cars were observed to be parked on both sides of Sunnydene Avenue in a manner Cabinet Member Petition Hearing – 5 February 2025 Part 1 Public which often acts as an unintended traffic calming measure but could also reduce access for larger vehicles. 5. Petitioners have requested ‘traffic calming humps’. Whilst some forms of traffic calming have been introduced widely, including so-called ‘speed tables’, petitioners may wish to consider the fact that such features can sometimes have the unintended effect of increasing noise from passing traffic, notably skip lorries and similar commercial vehicles which may carry loose loads. Horizontal traffic calming such as chicanes and similar measures are seldom suitable for a residential road; they can cause problems such as loss of parking, visual intrusion and are less effective at actually reducing the speeds of cars and vans in particular. The Cabinet Member may wish to advise the petitioners to consider these factors in their own deliberations, although to counter this argument it is noted that there is some traffic calming already in situ at the junction of Shenley Avenue; it may be instructive to hear from petitioners whether they are happy with the possible side-effects of this. 6. Fortunately, Sunnydene Avenue does not have a known poor road traffic c ollision record; indeed, officers have interrogated the Police Road Traffic Collision data for the road and have established that there were no road traffic collisions recorded by the Police for the most recent five years for which data is available. It is appreciated that incidents involving the Police may not tell the whole story, but at the same time this independent road traffic collision data from the Police is a very important tool to help the Council prioritise interventions across the Borough when there are always competing request. 7. Residents are clearly concerned at perceived vehicle speeds in their road. In light of the testimony made by residents, not only in the petition, but also during the meeting, the Cabinet Member may be minded to instruct officers to commission independent 24/7 speed and traffic surveys on Sunnydene Avenue at locations agreed with petitioners and Ward Councillors. 8. However, it is also strongly recommended that the views of the Metropolitan Police should also be sought because it is the m and them alone who have the ne cessary enforcement powers to tackle speeding in general as ‘speeding’ is an endorsable offence, which can lead to points on a driver’s licence as well as potential prosecution. Physical traffic calming can be an effective tool, but it can also have unwelcome side effects such as an increase in the noise caused by traffic passing through, such as skip lorries and larger vehicles . If the petitioners have not already done so, it is strongly recommended that they approach their neighbourhood police contacts w ho will generally respond to direct approaches from residents and may even lobby on their behalf as well as initiating positive actions such as spot enforcement. 9. Some kinds of traffic calming like chicanes would simply be unviable in a road like Sunnydene Avenue, but some measures such as speed cushions might be viable but would need the case to be supported by survey data in order to make a case for the considerable costs involved. Petitioners and ward councillors may wish to carefully consider if such factors are important to them when weighing up the options for any physical measures 10. As the Cabinet Member will be aware, independent traffic surveys are a reliable and well - established means to understand the real situation on the ground. The surveys gener ally use specialist equipment, including pneumatic tubes which are mounted temporarily on the Cabinet Member Petition Hearing – 5 February 2025 Part 1 Public road surface, fitted transversely across the whole width of the carriageway. These devices are installed for a period of at least a week to ten days and monitor t raffic movements on a ‘24/7’ basis. The discreet equipment is sufficiently sophisticated that not only can it record traffic speeds at any given time. It also records the size and type of vehicle, from motorcycles to large multi-axled lorries. 11. In conclusion, therefore, the Cabinet Member may wish to hear the testimony of petitioners and their local ward councillors. Financial Implications Subject to the outcome of discussion with petitioners, the Cabinet Member may request the commissioning of speed and traffic surveys. The current cost of these is c.£85 per location, with spend managed through the existing Transportation revenue budgets. RESIDENT BENEFIT & CONSULTATION The benefit or impact upon Hillingdon residents, service users and communities To allow the Cabinet Member to consider the petitioners’ request. Consultation & Engagement carried out (or required) None at this stage. CORPORATE CONSIDERATIONS Corporate Finance Corporate Finance has reviewed the recommendations to this report and concurs with the financial implications as set out above. Legal There are no legal impediments to the recommendation set out within the report. Comments from other relevant service areas None at this stage. BACKGROUND PAPERS Individual consultation responses TITLE OF ANY APPENDICES Appendix A - Location Plan

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

📄 Appendix A - Sunnydene Avenue location plan , item 5. PDF 511 KB

6. Gordon Road, Yiewsley - Petition Requesting Restricted Access To The Road At The Start And End Of The School Day PDF 428 KB

The lead petitioner was in attendance and addressed the Cabinet Member, highlighting the following points: · Gordon Road experienced high vehicle volumes during school drop-off and pick-up times. · Chaotic traffic conditions frequently led to near misses and accidents. · A recent incident involving a driver losing control underscored the urgency of intervention. · A number of traffic management measures were requested , including introducing restrictions on vehicle access during school hours and implementing a permit-based system allowing only residents and disabled users to access the road during peak times. Ward Councillor Naser Mohammed Abby raised concerns about speeding on Gordon Road, which leads to a primary school. He referenced that his petition benefited from nearly 400 signatures, proposing traffic restrictions while allowing exemptions for school drop-offs, staff, and disabled users, although he accepted when pointed out that only a small handful of signatures were from residents of Gordon Road, whose views on any proposals would clearly be paramount. Cllr Abby highlighted a recent incident where a driver lost control, crashing through a fence and nearly into an elderly resident’s living room. He also noted issues with parents arriving late, blocking driveways, and obstructing emergency vehicles. The petition aims to improve traffic control and prevent further risks to locals. The Cabinet Member informed petitioners that school-related traffic issues were a recurring concern across the borough. A traffic survey would be conducted, and further discussions would take place regarding the feasibility of restrictions. Consultation with local schools, parents, and law enforcement would be considered to explore alternative traffic management strategies. Advised ward councillor Abby to report to safer neighbourhood team . The Cabinet Member also encouraged ward councillor Abby to report these concerns directly to the Police Safer Neighbourhood team. R ESOLVED : That the Cabinet Member: 1. Met with petitioners and listened to their request for the Council to restrict access to Gordon Road at the start and end of the school day. 2. Requested officers to commission independent traffic surveys in an area agreed with Ward Councillors and video surveys for pedestrian movements in Gordon Road. 3. Requested Ward Councillors to encourage Rabbsfarm School to move forward with the work already co-developed with the Council’s School Travel and Road Safety Team, including the ‘Living Streets WOW’ challenge referenced in the report. Reasons for decision s The Petition Hearing provided a valuable opportunity to hear directly from the petitioners about their concerns and suggestions. Alternative options considered / risk management: None at this stage.

📄 Gordon Road, Yiewsley - Petition Requesting Restricted Access To The Road At The Start And End Of The School Day PDF 428 KB

Read the text of this document (5 pages)

Cabinet Member Petition Hearing – 5 February 2025 Part 1 Public GORDON ROAD , YIEWSLEY – PETITION REQUESTING RESTRICTED ACCESS TO THE ROAD AT THE START AND END OF THE SCHOOL DAY Cabinet Member & Portfolio Cllr Steve Tuckwell, Cabinet Member for Planning, Housing & Growth Responsible Officer Karrie Whelan - Corporate Director Place Report Author & Directorate Steven Austin – Place Directorate Papers with report Appendix A HEADLINES Summary To inform the Cabinet Member that a petition has been received asking for restricted access to Gordon Road at the start and end of the school day. Putting our Residents First Delivering on the Council Strategy 2022-2026 This report supports our ambition for residents / the Council of: Live in good quality, affordable homes in connected communities This report supports our commitments to residents of: Safe and Strong Communities The request can be considered as part of the Council’s annual programme for road safety measures. Financial Cost Should speed and traffic surveys be commissioned, costs will be c.£85 per location. Should video surveys for pedestrian and cycle movements be commissioned, this will cost in the region of £900. These costs can be managed within existing Transportation Services revenue budgets. Select Committee Corporate Resources & Infrastructure Select Committee. Ward(s) Yiewsley RECOMMENDATIONS That the Cabinet Member: 1) meets with petitioners and listens to their request for the Council to restrict access to Gordon Road at the start and end of the school day; Cabinet Member Petition Hearing – 5 February 2025 Part 1 Public 2) subject to the outcome of the above, asks officers to commission independent traffic surveys in an area agreed with ward councillors and video surveys for pedestrian movements in Gordon Road; and 3) In the meantime, asks Ward Councillors to encourage Rabbsfarm School to move forward with the work already co-developed with the Council’s School Travel and Road Safety Team, in particular the ‘Living Streets WOW’ challenge referenced in the report. Reasons for recommendations The Petition Hearing will provide a valuable opportunity to hear directly fr om the petitioners regarding their concerns and suggestions. Alternative options considered / risk management None at this stage. Select Committee comments None at this stage. SUPPORTING INFORMATION 1. A petition with 376 signatures has been submitted to the Council signed under the following heading: “Implementation of restricted road use around the school hours to ensure the safety of our community. 8:15am – 9am 2;45pm – 4:30pm. Road only available to residents and school staff during this time.” 2. Gordon Road is a mainly residential cul-de-sac comprising of semi-detached properties, all of which appear to have access to off-street parking provision. The width of the carriageway is approximately 5.7 metres and is bounded on both sides by a wide footway averaging around 1.4 metres wide. Although many properties appear to benefit from off-street parking, the road also benefits from a Parking Management Scheme operational Monday to Friday 8:30am to 5pm with the bays partially on the footway. Gordon Road provides the only access to Rabbsfarm School, and at the school entrance there are ‘school keep clear’ markings , some double and single yellow lines. A location plan is attached as Appendix A . 3. Although not specifically mentioned in the petition, it appears that the lead petitioner, in this instance one of the ward councillors, is asking for a ‘School Street’ for Gordon Road. 4. The idea of a ‘School Street’ is to make it safer and easier for children, parents and guardians to walk and cycle to school. The principle behind a ‘School Street’ is to temporarily Cabinet Member Petition Hearing – 5 February 2025 Part 1 Public close the road outside the school to all except essential traffic. It is hoped that the closure of the road will encourage the school comm unity to walk and cycle to school instead of driving. As well as improved road safety, there should be an overall improvement in air quality at these times. 5. As Gordon Road is effectively the only access to the school, restricting access to residents, businesses, pedestrians and cyclists onl y should significantly reduce traffic congestion around the school and improve the environment for local residents. 6. In order for a ‘School Street’ to be successful, it does require support from the local community, who will be most directly affecte d by any restricted access . R esidents, businesses, and school staff can apply for an exemption so that they can still go about their business as usual. 7. Another essential element to the success of a ‘School Street’ and general road safety improvements around a school is positive engagement between the school and the Council’s School Travel and Road Safety Team ( STARS) team. The Cabinet Member will be aware the STARS team actively works with several schools across Hillingdon to develop their school travel plans (STPs). This dialogue can not only result in the development of physical measures but can also help the school engage with children, parents and carers to consider how they travel to and from school and to st art to embed positive change to more sustainable modes of transport. 8. In addition, the STARS team offers free education, training and publicity to all schools in Hillingdon to improve safety and sustainability through travel plans, campaigns, projects and initiatives.  Support for ‘Walk to School week/ month’  ‘Bikeability’ training  Funding for scooter and cycle storage facilities,  Support for ‘Junior and Youth Travel Ambassadors’,  Delivering active and safe travel assemblies and classroom talks  Practical pedestrian training  ‘Moving On’ to secondary school presentations  ‘Theatre in Education’ productions 9. The STARS team have been in contact with Rabbsfarm School and th ere has been some positive indications that the school want to progress work on their STP . For example, Rabbsfarm was one of 14 schools the STARS team offered to take part in the ‘Living Streets WOW’ challenge this year to encourage more families to walk, scoot or cycle to school , which the school accepted. Rabbsfarm were targeted in particular as a result of the congestion issues the team had discussed with the school before the summer holidays. However, it seems from our recent report that they are yet to launch this within the school. It may be t hat the Ward Councillors could helpfully intervene to encourage the school to move forward with this. Cabinet Member Petition Hearing – 5 February 2025 Part 1 Public 10. However, as the Cabi net Member will be aware, there can be negative consequences to surrounding roads if a school street is introduced , with the displacement of traffic into the surrounding area being a concern identified through studies in in other areas. 11. Department for Transport guidance on ‘School Streets’ published on 19th November 2024 provides Highways Authorities with detailed information on factors to consider before a ‘School Street’ is implemented. One essential factor i n developing a ‘School Street’ to monitor and evaluate the scheme to determine whether it is working as intended. Arrangements for monitoring and evaluation nee d to be considered at an early stage of scheme development to inform the collection of baseline data prior to introducing the scheme. 12. This can take many forms but essentially it is recommended that traffic volume, type and speed within the area covered by the School Street and on surrounding streets should be monitored. Automatic traffic counters and/or video surveys are both useful methods of capturing this data. Monitoring traffic on streets surrounding t he School Street zone is important for understanding the impact of any traffic or parking displacement, especially where residents have raised concerns about such impacts. 13. In conclusion, therefore, the Cabinet Member may wish to hear the testimony of petitioners and their local ward councillors and decide whether to ask officers to commission independent traffic and video surveys are part of the initial investigation on the development of a possible ‘School Street’. Financial Implications Subject to the outcome of discussion with petitioners, the Cabinet Member may request the commissioning of speed and traffic surveys, the current cost of these is c.£85 per location. If the Cabinet Member is minded to commission video surveys for pedestria n and cycle movements, this will cost in the region of £900. Expenditure can be managed within the existing Transportation Services revenue budgets. RESIDENT BENEFIT & CONSULTATION The benefit or impact upon Hillingdon residents, service users and communities To allow the Cabinet Member to consider the petitioners’ request. Consultation & Engagement carried out (or required) None at this stage. CORPORATE CONSIDERATIONS Corporate Finance Corporate Finance has reviewed the recommendations to this report and concurs with the financial implications as set out above. Cabinet Member Petition Hearing – 5 February 2025 Part 1 Public Legal There are no legal impediments to following the recommendations set out within the report. Comments from other relevant service areas None at this stage. BACKGROUND PAPERS Individual consultation responses TITLE OF ANY APPENDICES Appendix A - Location plan

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

📄 Appendix A - Gordon Road location plan , item 6. PDF 447 KB

7. Church Road, West Drayton - Petition Requesting The Installation Of 'Speed Bumps' To Reduce The Speed Of Traffic PDF 408 KB

The lead petitioner was in attendance and addressed the Cabinet Member, highlighting the following points: · Church Road had experienced multiple accidents and near-misses, including an incident where a child was struck by a vehicle. · A previous petition for a zebra crossing had been stalled due to objections from certain residents. · Increased vehicular traffic in recent years had exacerbated the problem. · A number of traffic calming measures were requested, including the installation of speed bumps and a re-evaluation of the previous zebra crossing proposal in light of recent incidents. Ward Councillor Mohammed Shofiul Islam raised concerns with the Cabinet Member about speeding near Laurel Lane Primary School, St. Martin’s, and St. Catherine’s, emphasising the risk to residents and children walking to school. Ward Councillor Jan Sweeting attended in support of petitioners, stressing the need for safety measures on Church Road. She highlighted its multiple connecting roads and its link to Iver and the motorway, making it a hotspot for speeding, particularly by large industrial trucks. A petition was previously submitted by St. Martin’s. Some years ago, a separate petition was previously submitted by St. Martin’s seeking the introduction of a new Zebra Crossing, but it was understood that at the time there proved to be difficulty in securing accommodation between the opposing desires of those who wanted the new crossing and those concerned at the loss of disabled parking that this would have entailed. Ward Councillor Scott Farley was in attendance in support of the petitioners and his points were covered by both Councillors Sweeting and Islam. The Cabinet Member informed petitioners that Church Road had been the subject of multiple traffic safety concerns in past meetings. A comprehensive traffic survey would be conducted to assess road conditions and driver behaviour. Further engagement with residents, road safety officers, and the Highways Department would be necessary before deciding on interventions. R ESOLVED : That the Cabinet Member: 1. Met with petitioners and listened to their concerns over traffic speeds and their request for speed bumps on Church Road, West Drayton. 2. Decided that officers should commission independent 24/7 speed and traffic surveys on Church Road, West Drayton, at locations agreed with petitioners and Ward Councillors. 3. Decided that officers in the highways team should investigate the area around the barrier and effectively analyse how the gate could be more robust and prevent the gate from being Vandalised . Reasons for decisions The Petition Hearing provided a valuable opportunity to hear directly from the petitioners about their concerns and suggestions. Alternative options considered / risk management None at this stage .

📄 Church Road, West Drayton - Petition Requesting The Installation Of 'Speed Bumps' To Reduce The Speed Of Traffic PDF 408 KB

Read the text of this document (5 pages)

Cabinet Member Petition Hearing – 5 February 2025 (Part 1 Public) CHURCH ROAD, WEST DRAYTON – PETITION REQUESTING THE INSTALLATION OF ‘SPEED BUMPS’ TO REDUCE THE SPEED OF TRAFFIC Cabinet Member & Portfolio Cllr Steve Tuckwell, Cabinet Member for Planning, Housing & Growth Responsible Officer Karrie Whelan - Corporate Director Place Report Author & Directorate Steven Austin – Place Directorate Papers with report Appendix A HEADLINES Summary To inform the Cabinet Member that a petition has been received requesting ‘speed bumps’ on Church Road, West Drayton. Putting our Residents First Delivering on the Council Strategy 2022-2026 This report supports our ambition for residents / the Council of: Live in good quality, affordable homes in connected communities This report supports our commitments to residents of: Safe and Strong Communities The request can be considered as part of the Council’s annual programme for road safety measures. Financial Cost Should speed and traffic surveys be commissioned, costs will be c.£85 per location, managed within existing Transportation Services revenue budgets. Select Committee Corporate Resources & Infrastructure Select Committee Ward(s) West Drayton RECOMMENDATIONS That the Cabinet Member: 1) Meets with petitioners and listens to their concerns over traffic speeds and their request for ‘speed bumps’ on Church Road, West Drayton 2) Also, subject to the outcome of the above, decide if officers should commission independent 24/7 speed and traffic surveys on Church Road, West Drayton at locations agreed with petitioners and Ward Councillors Cabinet Member Petition Hearing – 5 February 2025 (Part 1 Public) Reasons for recommendations The Petition Hearing will provide a valuable opportunity to hear directly fr om the petitioners regarding their concerns and suggestions. Alternative options considered / risk management None at this stage. Select Committee comments None at this stage. SUPPORTING INFORMATION 1. A petition with 43 signatures has been submitted to the Council signed under the following heading: “Speed restrictions on Church Road, West Drayton require speed bumps. Require speed bumps are put in place to reduce the speed of traffic.” 2. Church Road is a mainly residential road close to local shops, small businesses, St Martin’s Church, Drayton Hall Park, The Closes Recreation Ground, and other local amenities. The average width of the carriageway at its widest point is approximately 7.3 meters and at its narrowest point is approximately 4.8 metres bounded on both sides by footways. 3. Church Road benefits from existing parking restrictions and some on-street residents permit parking bays operational Monday to Friday 9am to 5pm. 4. Officers have interrogated the most recent police recorded collision data for the last three years and there are three recorded incidents on Church Road. Two collisions were reported close to the junction of Swan Road, one in April 2021 classified as serious and another in November 2020 classified as slight. Another incident was recorded in July 2021 close to the entrance to Drayton Hall Park , which was also classified by the emergency services as slight. However, in light of the petition, it is recommended that the Cabinet Member may wish to hear the testimony from petitioners and their Ward Councillors to under stand in greater detail their road safety concerns. 5. Although the petition mentions so called ‘speed bumps’ and, if by these, petitioners are thinking of the older type of round -topped narrow transverse road humps – often known colloquially in the past as ‘sleeping policemen’ – then the Cabinet Member will be aware that the vast majority of councils, Hillingdon incl uded, have not introduced these particular measures for many years. Cabinet Member Petition Hearing – 5 February 2025 (Part 1 Public) 6. Having said that, various forms of traffic calming features could be considered , where appropriate, if there is a case for them. However, petitioners may wish to consider that such features can sometimes have the unintended effect of increasing noise from passing traffic, notably skip lorries and similar commercial vehicles which may carry loose loads. 7. Horizontal traffic calming measures , such as c hicanes and similar measures , are seldom suitable for the average residential road; they can cause loss of parking , are visually intrusive and are less effective at actually reducing the speeds, of cars and vans in particular. The Cabinet Member may wish to advise the petitioners to consider these factors in their own deliberations and it should be noted that any form of physical measures can prove to be ‘popular’ and ‘unpopular’ in equal measures. 8. Subject to the above, the Cabinet Member may be minded to commission independent 24/7 speed and traffic surveys on Church Road, West Drayton at locations agreed with petitioners and Ward Councillors. 9. As the Cabinet Member will be aware , independent traffic surveys are a reliable and well - established means to understand the real situation on the ground. These surveys generally use specialist equipment, including pneumatic tubes, which are mounted temporarily on the road surface, fitted transversely across the whole width of the carriageway. These devices are installed for a period of at least a week or ten days and monitor traffic movements on a ’24/7’ basis. The d iscreet equipment is sufficiently sophisticated such that not only can it record traffic speeds at any given time , but also record the size and type of vehicles, from motorcycles to large multi-axel lorries. 10. It is also recommended that, if they have not already done so, residents raise their concerns directly with the Metropo litan Police because they alone have the necessary powers to tackle speeding and inconsiderate driving in general (if this is the case in Church Road) through enforcement. Physical traffic calming can be an effective tool , but, as mentioned previously, it can also have unwelcome side effects, including an increase in noise caused by traffic passing through, such as skip lorries and larger vehicles. Financial Implications Subject to the outcome of discussion with petitioners, the Cabinet Member may request the commissioning of speed and traffic surveys. The current cost of these is c.£85 per location, with spend managed through the existing Transportation revenue budgets. RESIDENT BENEFIT & CONSULTATION The benefit or impact upon Hillingdon residents, service users and communities To allow the Cabinet Member to consider the petitioners’ request. Consultation & Engagement carried out (or required) None at this stage. Cabinet Member Petition Hearing – 5 February 2025 (Part 1 Public) CORPORATE CONSIDERATIONS Corporate Finance Corporate Finance has reviewed the recommendations to this report and concurs with the financial implications as set out above. Legal There are no legal impediments to following the recommendations within the report. Comments from other relevant service areas None at this stage. BACKGROUND PAPERS Individual consultation responses TITLE OF ANY APPENDICES Appendix A - Location plan Cabinet Member Petition Hearing – 5 February 2025 (Part 1 Public)

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

📄 Appendix A - Church Road location plan , item 7. PDF 460 KB

Page Updated:

The documents made available on this website are all public documents originally published by Hillingdon Council.
This website is an independent resident-led project and is not associated with the London Borough of Hillingdon or Hillingdon Council.
Please join your nearest Residents' Association to keep up-to-date with events in your local community.
For questions, suggestions or complaints about this webpage please get in touch.

Meetings Home | View All Updates | Debug | About

Hillingdon Docs: Home | About
Sections: Decisions | Meetings | News
Planning: Ruislip & Ruislip Manor | Eastcote | Ickenham | South Ruislip | Whole Borough | HMOs