Licensing

Friday 14th March 2025 • View on LB Hillingdon’s website

Meeting documents

👥 Attendance details 📄 Agenda frontsheet PDF 393 KB 📦 Agenda reports pack PDF 4 MB 📝 Printed minutes PDF 261 KB

Read the text of: Agenda frontsheet PDF 393 KB (3 pages)

Lloyd White Head of Democratic Services London Borough of Hillingdon, Phase II, Civic Centre, High Street, Uxbridge, UB8 1UW Putting our residents first NOTICE OF HEARING Licensing Sub- Committee Councillors on the Sub-Committee: Councillor Becky Haggar OBE, Chair Councillor Peter Smallwood OBE Councillor Scott Farley IMPORTANT INFORMATION On receipt of this notice, you MUST notify the Committee Clerk (contact details below) by the following date: Tuesday 11 March 2025 If you don’t notify you may lose your right to speak at the hearing. When notifying you must confirm: 1) Whether you intend to attend or to be represented by someone at the hearing; 2) If you consider a hearing to be unnecessary and; 3) Whether to request that another person attends (other than your representative) as a witness Date: Friday 14 March 2025 Time: 10:00 Venue: Committee Room 5, Civic Centre, High Street, Uxbridge, UB8 1UW Meeting Details: If this is a public hearing, then the public and press are welcome to attend and observe the meeting. For safety and accessibility, security measures will be conducted, including searches of individuals and their belongings. Attendees must also provide satisfactory proof of identity upon arrival. Refusal to comply with these requirements will result in non- admittance. This meeting may be broadcast on the Council’s YouTube channel. You can also view this agenda online at www.hillingdon.gov.uk Published: Thursday, 27 February 2025 Contact: Ryan Dell Tel: 01895 25 0636 Email: democratic@hillingdon.gov.uk Useful information for residents and visitors Watching & recording this meeting (if a public meeting only) If this meeting is to be held in Public (Part 1) you can watch it on the Council's YouTube channel, live or archived after the meeting. Residents and the media are also welcome to attend in person, and if they wish, report on the public part of the meeting. Any individual or organisation may record or film proceedings as long as it does not disrupt proceedings. It is recommended to give advance notice of filming to ensure any particular requirements can be met. The Council will provide seating areas for residents/public, high speed WiFi access to all attending and an area for the media to report. The officer shown on the front of this agenda should be contacted for further information and will be available to assist. When present in the room, silent mode should be enabled for all mobile devices. Travel and parking Bus routes 427, U1, U3, U4 and U7 all stop at the Civic Centre. Uxbridge underground station, with the Piccadilly and Metropolitan lines, is a short walk away. Limited parking is available at the Civic Centre. For details on availability and how to book a parking space, please contact Democratic Services. Please enter via main reception and visit the security desk to sign-in and collect a visitor’s pass. You will then be directed to the Committee Room. Accessibility For accessibility options regarding this agenda please contact Democratic Services. For those hard of hearing an Induction Loop System is available for use. Emergency procedures If there is a FIRE, you will hear a continuous alarm. Please follow the signs to the nearest FIRE EXIT and assemble on the Civic Centre forecourt. Lifts must not be used unless instructed by a Fire Marshal or Security Officer. In the event of a SECURITY INCIDENT, follow instructions issued via the tannoy, a Fire Marshal or a Security Officer. Those unable to evacuate using the stairs, should make their way to the signed refuge locations. Agenda CHAIRMAN'S ANNOUNCEMENTS Hearing Protocol 1 Apologies for Absence 2 Declarations of interest in matters coming before this meeting 3 To confirm that the items of business marked Part I will be considered in Public and items marked Part II will be considered in Private 4 Matters that have been notified in advance or urgent Part I - Members, Public and Press Title of Report / Address of application Ward Time Page 5 Application for the grant of a Premises Licence: McDonalds, 22/24 Station Road, Hayes, UB3 4DA Hayes Town 10:00 3 - 48

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

Read the text of: Printed minutes PDF 261 KB (10 pages)

Minutes LICENSING SUB-COMMITTEE 14 March 2025 Meeting held at Committee Room 5 - Civic Centre Committee Members Present: Councillor Darran Davies Councillor Peter Smallwood OBE Councillor Scott Farley Officers Present: Mark Rose, Licensing Officer Chantelle McLeod, Legal Advisor Ryan Dell, Democratic Services Officer Also Present: Ms Anisha Sharma – applicant Mr Shemuel Sheikh – applicant’s representative Mr David Brough – Interested Party Councillor Janet Gardner – Interested Party 96. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE (Agenda Item 1) None. 97. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST IN MATTERS COMING BEFORE THIS MEETING (Agenda Item 2) None. 98. TO CONFIRM THAT THE ITEMS OF BUSINESS MARKED PART I WILL BE CONSIDERED IN PUBLIC AND ITEMS MARKED PART II WILL BE CONSIDERED IN PRIVATE (Agenda Item 3) It was confirmed that all items of business were in Part I and would be considered in public. 99. MATTERS THAT HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED IN ADVANCE OR URGENT (Agenda Item 4) None. 100. APPLICATION FOR THE GRANT OF A PREMISES LICENCE: MCDONALDS, 22/24 STATION ROAD, HAYES, UB3 4DA (Agenda Item 5) At the request of Democratic Services, a nomination for Chair was moved and seconded. It was agreed that Councillor Darran Davies would Chair the meeting. INTRODUCTION Officers introduced the application for a late -night refreshment license for McDonalds, 22-24 Station Road, Hayes, UB3 4DA. The application had been submitted by Ms Elaine Rayner (agen t) from Shoesmiths LLP on behalf of Rocket Restaurants Limited based at McDonalds, Iron Bridge, Uxbridge Road, UB1 3EG. The application related to late night refreshment seven days a week, Monday to Sunday 23:00 until 00:00, without seasonal variations. This would allow for the selling of hot food and drink for consumption on and off the premi ses for one additional hour. The proposed opening hours were 06:00 to 00:00 throughout the week. The application stated that what was in place already was robust an d as far as reasonably practicable, secured the promotion of the licencing objectives. The application confirmed the use of CCTV, StaffSafe training, partnership working policies and litter patrols. The application was submitted on 17 January 2025. The application was processed and sent out for consultation on 20 January. The application was advertised in an issue of the Uxbridge Gazette on 22 January. Officers attended the venue on 28 January and took a photo of the Blue Notice on display at the restaura nt in full view of passersby. The last date for representations was set as 14 February. Dur ing the consultation period, officers received objections from one Ward Councillor and one from the Hayes Town Ward Safer Neighbourhood Panel. The addendum highlighted proposed conditions agreed between the Licensing Authority and the agent, Ms Rayner. The Committee were invited to determine the application. Members asked and officers clarified that only one Ward Councillor had submitted a representation, and no objections had been received aside from the two stated. APPLICANT Mr Shemuel Sheikh, the applicant’s representative, noted that the application followed what had already been granted under planning permission in terms of operating hours. The Licensing Authority had no objection to the application and there was an agreed list of proposed conditions. There were also no objections received from the police as a responsible authority or from nearby residents, and it was confirmed that no one currently lived above the premises. It was highlighted that the two objections that had been received were primarily of speculation as opposed to evidence. It was further highlighted that there was a review mechanism in place should any future issues arise. There was no evidence of anti-social behaviour and lots of nearby premises had similar operating hours. The application listed measures currently in place to meet the licensing objectives and these included training of all employees; the StaffSafe system which allowed an external operator to dial into to control any potential situations of antisocial behavi our through the Tannoy system and to log into CCTV and alert the authorities; litter picks in the general area which extended not just to McDonalds litter but any general litter. The restaurant had self -closing doors to restrict noise levels and there were signs to keep noise down. There were ‘bin it’ logos on packaging. The applicant, Ms Sharma, owned other restaurants and so was experienced in this area. Ms Sharma had also expressed an intention to join the Hillingdon Safer Neighbourhood Board to take an y concerns into account and make sure the restaurant was responding accordingly. Members asked about the other restaurants owned by the applicant. Iron Bridge was the applicant’s first restaurant and where the head office was. The applicant also owned Southall Broadway which although classed as a drive -through, the majority of the business done was through footfall and so similar to Hayes. The applicant was due to a cquire Ealing Broadway in the very near future, which was another high street restaurant. It was clarified that the restaurant in Southall Broadway was set back from the road. The restaurant in Ealing Broadway was also on a parade and so was pedestrian access only. Members asked about the distinction between planning and licensing. Officers confirmed that planning and licensing were two separate regimes and so Members had to focus on licensing, irrespective of the position with planning. Members referred to the addendum, and asked how litter picks were monitored and maintained. The applicant n oted that in a restaurant that operated at these hours, they tended to have three shifts per day (morning, midday and evening). At each of these shifts, the applicant was personally communicated to by the shift manager about what happened on the shift, fro m service times to waste. The applicant frequently asked for pictures of what had taken place. Members noted the applicant’s willingness to join the Hillingdon Saf er Neighbourhood Board and suggested joining the Hayes Town Ward Safer Neighbourhood Panel instead. Members referred to gatherings and antisocial behaviour outside the premises and asked about dispersal plans. The applicant noted that since they had taken over the restaurant in March 2024, instances of anti -social behaviour had reduced. The applicant had changed the schedule of door supervisors so that people would not know when they were coming. The applicant had changed the music played at the restauran t from chart music to classical music. They had also introduced face painting and photos and a managed dressed up as an animal at weekends. Staff were encouraged to be out in the lobby and not just behind the counter. Members asked about the plan for online takeaway services and if there would be a cut off time for these. The applicant noted t hat they would like to have this available until 00:00. The restaurant had limited powers over where delivery drivers parked, but they did have a designated area wit hin the restaurant where they waited. Discussions were had frequently with these drivers to make sure they understood what was expected of them when they were in the restaurant. Members asked how many delivery drivers had been banned from stores. The applicant noted that one had been banned. The applicant also noted that they had frequent conv ersations with delivery drivers and that building relationships was important. If a relationship was not working, there were mechanisms in place to escalate this. Members asked how many delivery drivers may be inside the store at any one time. The applicant noted that there would be about five on average. Members asked about dispersal from the pavement outside the store. The applicant noted that while there was limited remit outside of the store, they were happy to have conversations with people and put up signs to ask people not to congregate outside. INTERESTED PARTIES Councillor Gardner Councillor Gardner noted that McDonalds was a place to meet up to sell dru gs. The alleyway next door was used as a urinal by delivery drivers. On the occasion of the previous Ward Surgery there were 16 motorbikes parked on the street. A lot of the delivery drivers were rude. It was acknowledged that there were no residents living directly above the premises but there were residents living close by. It was a surprise that the police had not submitted an objection as there had been a lot of trouble in the vicinity including knives being seized. There was concern for the residents. Litter was a concern. Litter was not kept only to the immediate vicinity. Being open for an extra hour was just waiting for trouble. It was noted that the objection was submitted on behalf of all three Ward Councillors. Members asked which of the licensing objectives were of most concern. Councillor Gardner noted prevention of public nuisance and prevention of crime and disorder. Members asked if any comments had been received from residents in the immediate vicinity. Councillor Gardner noted that t here had been lots of complaints from residents about the delivery drivers playing loud mus ic and being rude to them. Members asked if it was certain that these drivers were going to McDonalds, and it was noted that this was not 100% certain. Members asked and officers clarified that, aside from the two representations noted, no others had been received. Mr Brough Mr Brough noted that the Hayes Town Safer Neighbourhood Panel was made up of representatives of residents, places of work, and local business . This application had been raised at their previous meeting, where it was unanimously agre ed among 19 attendees to submit an objection. There were no objections to McDonalds itself, but the objection was more on the grounds of the impact on the locality and the safety of young people. McDonalds was distinctive as it was very popular with youn g people and had the highest number of home delivery drivers of any other place in Hayes. Mr Brough had witnessed staff clearing litter from the front of the premi ses, but delivery drivers often stood in the alleyway, which was not cleared. There was an issue with the number of motorbikes outside, and there were at least 12 every day. On one occasion Mr Brough took a photo showing 14 motorbikes outside. The motorbikes were taking up spaces meant for shoppers. The restaurant had become a focal point for groups to gather in front of, in the alleyway and behind the restaurant. People had been found with knives. It was suggested that the police may not have submitte d an objection because these incidents did not happen regularly but did occur every so often. It was suggested that the best way to deal with these concerns would be to have door supervisors present at all times, in the name of prevention of crime. The issue of litter could be covered by the proposed conditions, and it was hoped that these would include the alleyway. It was acknowledged that the alleyway was privately owned. It was acknowledged that not all of the drivers were linked to McDonalds, but McDonalds had the largest number of deliveries in Hayes. Members asked and it was clarifi ed that the purpose of this Sub -Committee was to consider granting a license for one additional hour, not to review the existing licence. Members noted that the alleyway was private land. Members noted a previous occasion of police standing outside the premises and asked if this was before or after the applicant had taken over the premises in March 2024. This was unknown. Members asked if there were any particula r issues between 23:00 and 00:00. It was noted that having more people circulating in the t own would add to existing issues. People had noted not wanting to go through the town at nighttime. It was reiterated that this location was a place for young people to congregate. DISCUSSION The applicant’s representative clarified that the point mad e about previous planning permission was to note that noise was a material planning consideration that had been taken into account in granting planning permission. On delivery drivers and people congregating in the town, there was limited influence that the applicant could have on this. Signage may encourage people to wait inside the store. It was noted that a number of other establishments were open until and past midnight. This included Chiiwala (open until 00:00); Rooster’s Spot (open until 03:00); Lo ve Desserts (open until 03:00); Botwell Inn (open until 01:00); and Royal Chicken (open until 02:00). Issues with the alleyway, and litter in the alleyway, were not within control of the applicant as it was privately owned. There were no objections from the police, and there were mechanisms to review the licence in future. Having door supervisors at differing times was already working and was a more proportionate response than employing them at all times. Members asked how many hours door supervisors were used for currently. The applicant advised that it was currently around 10 hours. Members asked how many of the other local food-based businesses currently had door staff at any time in the day, and particularly after 23:00. Officers noted that there would not be a distinction on this between sit -down or takeaway restaurants. Of the local licenced premises, four had late -night refreshment. Two of these were public houses and two were restaurants. Of these four, only one had SIA. It was noted that there appeared to be good feeling between parties to resolve issues. Members noted that being open for an extra hour would lead to more litter. Members noted that the proposed conditions referred to a map to be developed of litter pick areas. The applicant noted that they typically cleared litter from the alleyway as well as the front of the store. Wider litter picks tended to be arranged on an ad hoc basis. Members asked about external litter bins. The applicant noted that they did not own the land to the front of the store and do did not have responsibility for this. Members asked about arrangements for waste collection and stock deliveries. The applicant noted that the current delivery plan had been in place since before they took over the store. It had not changed and would not change. Members asked about adding lighting to the outside of the building along the alleyway. It was noted that there was a gate that used to be locked, but discussions could be had on this. The StaffSafe system was confirmed to be in use. If was suggested that Ward Councillors could make this a priority at the next Ward Panel. Members suggested keeping a record of complaints about delivery drivers and any actions taken. The applicant noted that they kept a record and would be happy to share the information. It was clarified that at the back of the store there was a fire door to a small, enclosed space where bins were located. There was a car park and two separate car garages. CLOSING REMARKS Mr Brough noted that the g ate to the alleyway had been previously vandalised and so was not lockable. Mr Brough was pleased to hear that staff cleared the alleyway but noted that this had not been done recently. Mr Brough noted that he had the contact details for the landowner. Door supervisors at all times would reassure the public. The applicant’s representative noted that there had been helpful discussions on the alleyway. It was reiterated that the current system of door supervisors at changing times was working effectively. It was also reiterated that there was a mechanism for the licence to be reviewed at a later stage. COMMITTEE DELIBERATION All parties were asked to leave the room w hile the Sub -Committee considered its decision. The decision of the Sub -Committee was sub sequently broadcast on the Council’s YouTube Channel: Hillingdon London. THE DECISION The Sub -Committee listened to all representations made both oral and written. The Sub-Committee welcomed the conditions offered and agreed by the parties in addition to the applicant’s willingness to work proactively with the local community. The Sub-Committee considered all relevant evidence made available to it and in doing so took the following into account: • Licensing Objectives, Licensing Act 2003 • Hillingdon's Licensing Policy • Guidance issued by the Secretary of State under s.182 of the Licensing Act 2003 The decision of the Sub -Committee is to GRANT the application for the provision of Late-Night Refreshment Sunday to Monday between 2300 hours and 0000 hou rs. The operating hours of the business shall be between 0600 hours and 0000 hours. The new premises licence will be subject to the conditions as set out as follows: General 1) Staff shall receive training in relation to conflict resolution and anti -social behaviour reduction. Training records shall be made available for inspection upon request the Police or authorised council officer. The Prevention of Crime and Disorder 2) The premises shall install and maintain a comprehensive CCTV system. The CCTV shall c ontinually record whilst the premises is open for licensable activities. All recordings shall be stored for a minimum period of 31 days with date and time stamping. Viewing of recordings shall be made available immediately upon request of Police or authori sed council officer throughout the entire 31-day period. 3) Signage to be displayed at the premises advising customers that CCTV is in operation at the site. 4) A staff member from the premises who is conversant with the operation of the CCTV system shall be available during licensable hours. This staff member must be able to provide the Police or authorised council officer copies of recent CCTV images or data with the absolute minimum of delay when requested. 5) An incident log shall be kept at the premises and made available on request to an authorised officer of the Council or the Police. It will record the following: (a) all crimes reported to the venue (b) any complaints received concerning crime and disorder (c) any incidents of disorder (d) any faults in the CCTV system (e) any visit by a relevant authority or emergency service Public Safety 6) The means of escape provided for the premises shall be maintaine d unobstructed, free of trip hazards, be immediately available and clearly identified in accordance with the plans provided. The Prevention of Public Nuisance 7) There shall be a minimum of 4 litter picks per day within the immediate vicinity of the premises. A map of the litter pick areas to include the front of McDonalds, shall be maintained, u pdated and shared with an authorised officer of the Council. 8) Restaurant doors shall be self -closing. Self-closing doors at the premises shall be maintained in eff ective working order to limit noise both when ordering food and leaving the area. 9) Prominent, clear notices shall be displayed at the premises, including the entrance and exit, requesting customers to respect the needs of local residents and to leave the premises and local area quietly. 10) Delivery drivers shall be instructed to respect the need s of local residents including; (a) remaining inside the premises whilst waiting to collect orders for delivery entering and leaving their vehicles quietly and considerately (b) not leaving their vehicle engines running (c) ensuring that no recorded music is bein g played from the vehicle whilst waiting at the premises (d) parking their vehicles considerately 11) An incident log shall be kept at the premises and made available upon request to an authorised officer of the Council or the Police recording any incidents involving delivery drivers. 12) The premises shall install security lighting on the side of the premises adjacent to the alley way. Protection from Children from Harm 13) Staff shall receive safeguarding training and training records shall be made available for inspection upon request by the Police or authorised Council Officer. REASONS The Sub-Committee recognise that this is a new application for the grant of provision of late-night refreshment between the hours 2300 hours until 0000 hours, extending their operating hours by an additional hour. Apart from the representations from the two interested parties objecting to the application, the Sub-Committee note that there have been no further objections directly from residents, Responsible Authorities nor member s’ enquiries logged by councillors in respect of this application. The sub -committed determined that the applicant in their submissions demonstrated sound experience and understanding of the licensing objectives, noting that the applicant also currently r uns two other McDonalds restaurants located at Iron Bridge, Southall, a drive thru operating 24 hours a day and Southall Broadway, operating until 1am. This applicat ion represents a third restaurant for the applicant with a soon to be fourth in Ealing Broadway which is currently operating 24 hours a day. The sub -committee took into account the management techniques employed by the applicant since taking over the premises in March 2024 including the employment of security staff (initially every day) a chan ge of background music to classical music and the deployment of shift staff within the lobby. These tactics appeared to have reduced anti-social behaviour at the premises and changed the overall tone of the restaurant. In relation to third -party delivery drivers, the sub -committee listened to the concerns raised by the interested parties relating to the potential public nuisance posed by delivery drivers attending the restaurant. The sub-committee consider that the applicant already has sufficient measures in place to manage delivery drivers attending the restaurant and welcomed the applicant’s willingness to encourage delivery drivers to wait inside the premises in a designated area to the right of the restaurant during the later hours to avoid potential n oise nuisance. The sub -committee were also pleased to hear that the applicant was willing to have a system in place whereby issues concerning delivery drivers could be escalated and recorded in an incident log. The sub -committee also listened carefully to the representations made by the interested parties particularly in relation to the prevention of crime and public nuisance in the Hayes Town area. The interested pa rties submitted that Hayes Town suffered particularly with anti -social behaviour, with the restaurant becoming a focal point for groups to congregate. It was also suggested that the restaurant was linked to the sale of drugs with knives being seized in the area close to the restaurant and that the alleyway adjacent to the restaurant was experien cing an increase of litter and also being used as a urinal by delivery drivers. Whilst the sub -committee were disappointed to learn about the issues blighting the area of Hayes Town, they were of the view that the concerns raised were speculative and therefore were not persuaded that these issues could be directly attributed to the applicant’s premises in light of other licenced premises in the area and in absence of tangible evidence or representations from responsible authorities or members enquiries. In addition, the sub-committee considered that the land at the rear of the premises and the alley way was on private land and therefore the applicant was limited in terms of the action it could take to promote the licensing objectives however, increased l itter picking around the vicinity of the premises and the installation of security lighting on the applicant’s building lighting the alleyway area could be effective measures to help combat public nuisance. It was suggested that the restaurant employ S.I .A security staff on a full -time basis so as to minimise the risk of anti -social behaviour, the sub -committee however determine that this would be a disproportionate measure in light of the current mechanisms in place to promote the prevention of crime and disorder whereby security staff are employed on sporadic days. The sub -committee were of the view that the applicant’s intention to join the Hayes Town Hillingdon Safer Neighbourhood Board was a positive step in the right direction and encouraged open dialogue with the owners of the private land with view to working collaboratively to promote the licensing objectives going forward. Having considered all the inform ation put before it, the sub -committee were satisfied that on balance that the Applicant would comply with the licensing objectives. Right of Appeal The relevant applicant for the premises licence or any other person who made relevant representations to the application may appeal against the Council’s decision to the Justices Clerk at the Uxb ridge Magistrates Court. Such an appeal may be brought within 21 days of receipt of this Notice of Decision. No decision made by the Council will have effect durin g the time period within which an appeal may be brought and until such time that any appeal has been determined or abandoned. The Sub-Committee advises as a comfort to residents and a warning to the licensee that the licence may be reviewed and could potentially be revoked if licence conditions are not adhered to and/or if the premises are mana ged in a manner which does not uphold the licensing objectives. You will be deemed to have received this decision letter, two days after the date on the accompanying letter, which will be posted by 1st class mail. The meeting, which commenced at 10.00 am, closed at 12.35 pm. These are the minutes of the above meeting. For more information on any of the resolutions please contact Ryan Dell at democratic@hillingdon.gov.uk . Circulation of these minutes is to Councillors, Officers, the Press and Members of the Public. The public part of this meeting was filmed live on the Council's YouTube Channel to increase transparency in decision -making, however these minutes remain the official and definitive record of proceedings.

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

Attendance

Present: Councillor Darran Davies, Councillor Peter Smallwood OBE, Councillor Scott Farley, Chantelle McLeod, Councillor Janet Gardner

Agenda

96. Apologies for Absence

None.

97. Declarations of interest in matters coming before this meeting

None.

98. To confirm that the items of business marked Part I will be considered in Public and items marked Part II will be considered in Private

It was confirmed that all items of business were in Part I and would be considered in public.

99. Matters that have been notified in advance or urgent

None.

100. Application for the grant of a Premises Licence: McDonalds, 22/24 Station Road, Hayes, UB3 4DA PDF 365 KB

At the request of Democratic Services, a nomination for Chair was moved and seconded. It was agreed that Councillor Darran Davies would Chair the meeting. INTRODUCTION Officers introduced the application for a late-night refreshment license for McDonalds, 22-24 Station Road, Hayes, UB3 4DA. The application had been submitted by Ms Elaine Rayner (agent) from Shoesmiths LLP on behalf of Rocket Restaurants Limited based at McDonalds, Iron Bridge, Uxbridge Road, UB1 3EG. The application related to late night refreshment seven days a week, Monday to Sunday 23:00 until 00:00, without seasonal variations. This would allow for the selling of hot food and drink for consumption on and off the premises for one additional hour. The proposed opening hours were 06:00 to 00:00 throughout the week. The application stated that what was in place already was robust and as far as reasonably practicable, secured the promotion of the licencing objectives. The application confirmed the use of CCTV, StaffSafe training, partnership working policies and litter patrols. The application was submitted on 17 January 2025. The application was processed and sent out for consultation on 20 January. The application was advertised in an issue of the Uxbridge Gazette on 22 January. Officers attended the venue on 28 January and took a photo of the Blue Notice on display at the restaurant in full view of passersby. The last date for representations was set as 14 February. During the consultation period, officers received objections from one Ward Councillor and one from the Hayes Town Ward Safer Neighbourhood Panel. The addendum highlighted proposed conditions agreed between the Licensing Authority and the agent, Ms Rayner. The Committee were invited to determine the application. Members asked and officers clarified that only one Ward Councillor had submitted a representation, and no objections had been received aside from the two stated. APPLICANT Mr Shemuel Sheikh, the applicant’s representative, noted that the application followed what had already been granted under planning permission in terms of operating hours. The Licensing Authority had no objection to the application and there was an agreed list of proposed conditions. There were also no objections received from the police as a responsible authority or from nearby residents, and it was confirmed that no one currently lived above the premises. It was highlighted that the two objections that had been received were primarily of speculation as opposed to evidence. It was further highlighted that there was a review mechanism in place should any future issues arise. There was no evidence of anti-social behaviour and lots of nearby premises had similar operating hours. The application listed measures currently in place to meet the licensing objectives and these included training of all employees; the StaffSafe system which allowed an external operator to dial into to control any potential situations of antisocial behaviour through the Tannoy system and to log into CCTV and alert the authorities; litter picks in the general area which extended not just to McDonalds litter but any general litter. The restaurant had self-closing doors to restrict ... view the full minutes text for item 100.

📄 Application for the grant of a Premises Licence: McDonalds, 22/24 Station Road, Hayes, UB3 4DA PDF 365 KB

Read the text of this document (14 pages)

Licensing Sub-Committee – 14 March 2025 Part I – Public Application for the grant of a Premises Licence: McDonalds, 22/24 Station Road, Hayes, UB3 4DA Committee Licensing Sub-Committee Officer Contact Mark Rose – Licensing Officer Papers with report Appendix 1 - Application for the grant of a new premises licence Appendix 2 - Plan of premises Appendix 3 - Representation from a Ward Councillor Appendix 4 - Representation from an Interested Party Appendix 5 - Map of the area Appendix 6 - Photo of the premises Ward name Hayes Town 1.0 SUMMARY To consider an application for the grant of a new premises licence as seen in Appendix 1 in respect of McDonalds, 22/24 Station Road, Hayes, UB34DA which has attracted representations, from a Ward Councillor and an interested party. The plan of the premises is attached here as Appendix 2. 2.0 RECOMMENDATION That the Licensing Sub-Committee consider this application for the grant of a new premises licence in respect of McDonalds, 22/24 Station Road, Hayes, UB34DA. 3.0 APPLICATION This new premises licence application has been submitted by Elaine Rayner, an agent, acting on behalf of the applicant Rocket Restaurants Limited. This application has been submitted as permitted under Section 2(3) of the Licensing Act 2003 and it seeks permission for late-night refreshment, Monday to Sunday 23:00 hours to 00:00 hours. (7 days a week). Opening hours sought are from Monday to Sunday from 06:00 – 00:00 hours 7 days a week. The hours and the lice nsable activities are listed with further details in paragraphs 3.3 and 3.4 below. 3.1 Type of application applied for New premises licence application pursuant to Section 17 of Licensing Act 2003. 3.2 Description of the premises In section 5 in Appendix 1, the applicant has described the premises as follows- Restaurant selling hot food and non-alcoholic drink for consumption on and off the premises. Licensing Sub-Committee – 14 March 2025 Part I – Public The premises is situated on a busy road that has many restaurants and fast-food outlets. There are off licenses and a casino style establishment at 32/36 Station Road. There are 2 public houses in close vicinity. It is situated between Boots and ‘The Village’ a shop containing 4 units which offers locksmith services, 2 hairdressers and a repair shop. Many of the shops in the area appear to have residential properties above them. 3.3 Licensable Activities Activity Proposed for new premises licence Late Night Refreshment Indoors and Outdoors x 3.4 Opening Hours and proposed hours for licensable activity Late Night Refreshment Monday 23:00 - 00:00 Tuesday 23:00 - 00:00 Wednesday 23:00 - 00:00 Thursday 23:00 - 00:00 Friday 23:00 - 00:00 Saturday 23:00 - 00:00 Sunday 23:00 - 00:00 Opening Hours of The Premises Monday 06:00 – 00:00 Tuesday 06:00 – 00:00 Wednesday 06:00 – 00:00 Thursday 06:00 – 00:00 Friday 06:00 – 00:00 Saturday 06:00 – 00:00 Sunday 06:00 – 00:00 3.5 Other licensed premises nearby Premises Activities Authorised Times Authorised Sofia’s Superstore 38 Station Road Hayes UB34DD Sale of alcohol – Off supplies only Monday to Sunday 09.00 hours to 21:30 hours. Good Friday 08.00 hours to 22.30 hours Christmas Day 12.00 hours to 15.00 hours and 19.00 hours to 22.30 hours The Old Crown 81 Station Road Hayes UB34BG Sale of alcohol – on and off sales only Regulated entertainment. a) Provision of live music: From 10.00 hours until 00.00 hours every day b) Provision of recorded music: From 10.00 hours until 00.00 hours every day, except when the sale of alcohol is extended as in f) below then until 01.00 hours the following day. Licensing Sub-Committee – 14 March 2025 Part I – Public Late night refreshment c) Provision of facilities for making music: From 20.00 hours until 00.00 hours every day except when the sale of alcohol is extended as in f) below then until 01.00 hours the following day. d) Provision of facilities for dancing: From 20.00 hours until 01.00 hours every day except when the sale of alcohol is extended as in f) below then until 02.00 hours the following day. e) Provision of late night refreshment: From 23.00 hours until 01.00 hours the following day, every day, except when the sale of alcohol is extended as in f) below then until 02.00 hours the following day. f) Sale of alcohol: From 10.00 hours until 01.00 hours the following day, every day On Friday, Saturday, Sunday and Monday of Bank Holiday weekends, Christmas Eve and Boxing day, from 10.00 hours until 02.00 hours the following day On New Years Eve, from 10.00 hours until 02.00 hours on New Years Day From 07.00 hours until 02.00 hours the following day on 15 occasions per calendar year, subject to providing the Licensing Service, the Councils Environmental Protection Unit and the Metropolitan Police Service 10 working days notice, and then only on receiving a subsequent ‘CONSENT’ from the Councils Licensing Service, in respect of this agreement to the specified day and/or times applied for. Save More Superstore 75 Station Road Hayes UB34BG Sale of alcohol – Off sales Between 08:00 hours and 00:00 hours Monday to Sunday The Fone & Vape off licence 21 Station Approach Hayes UB34BD Sale of alcohol – off sales only From 08:00 hours until 23:00 hours every day Licensing Sub-Committee – 14 March 2025 Part I – Public Hari News 17 Station Road Hayes UB34BD Sale of alcohol – off sales only From 07:00 hours until 23:00 hours Monday to Sunday Global Wine Mart 18/20 Coldharbour lane Hayes UB33EW Sale of alcohol – off sales only Between 08:00 – 00:00 hours Sira’s 42/44 Coldharbour Lane Hayes UB33EP Sale of Alcohol – off sales only Monday to Saturday 08:00 hours to 21:00 hours Sunday 10:00 hours to 21:00 hours Botwell Inn 25/29 Coldharbour Lane Hayes UB33EB Sale of alcohol –On and off sales Late Night refreshment Sale of alcohol On Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday, except Christmas Eve, New Years Eve and Boxing Day, between 09:00 hours and 00:30 hours. On Friday and Saturday, except Christmas Eve, New Years Eve and Boxing Day, between 09:00 hours and 01:00 hours. On Christmas Eve and Boxing Day between 09:00 hours and 02:00 hours. On New Years Eve from 09:00 hours until 09:00 hours on New Years Day An additional hour following the times detailed in above on:- Burns Night – 25 January Australia Day – 26 January St. David’s Day – 1 March St. Patrick’s Day – 17 March St George’s Day – 23 April St. Andrew’s Day - 30 November An additional 30 minutes following the times detailed in above on:- Thursdays preceding Easter Sundays preceding a Bank Holiday Between the hours of 06:00 and 03:00 the following day, on no more than 12 Licensing Sub-Committee – 14 March 2025 Part I – Public Botwell Inn 25/29 Coldharbour Lane Hayes UB33EB Sale of alcohol –On and off sales Late Night refreshment occasions per calendar year, subject to providing the Licensing Service, the Councils Environmental Protection Unit and the Metropolitan Police Service 10 working days notice, and then only on receiving a subsequent ‘CONSENT’ from the Councils Licensing Service, in respect of this agreement to the specified day and/or times applied for. Late night refreshment From 23.00 hours to the terminal times detailed above. On Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday, except Christmas Eve, New Years Eve and Boxing Day, between 07:00 hours and 01:30 hours. On Friday and Saturday, except Christmas Eve, New Years Eve and Boxing Day, between 07:00 hours and 02:00 hours. On Christmas Eve and Boxing Day between 07:00 hours and 03:00 hours. On New Years Eve from 07:00 hours until 07:00 hours on New Years Day. An additional hour to the times stated in above on:- Burns Night – 25 January Australia Day – 26 January St. David’s Day – 1 March St. Patrick’s Day – 17 March St George’s Day – 23 April St. Andrew’s Day -30 November An additional 30 minutes following the times detailed in above on:- Thursdays preceding Easter Sundays preceding a Bank Holiday Salvador’s Piri Piri 13 Coldharbour Lane Hayes UB33EA Late Night refreshment Each day between 23.00 hours and 03.00 hours the following day Masters 5 Coldharbour Lane Hayes UB33EA Sale of alcohol – off sales only Monday to Saturday 0800 to 2300 hours Sunday 1000 to 2230 hours Good Friday 0800 to 2230 hours Christmas Day 1200 to 1500 and 1900 to 2230 hours Licensing Sub-Committee – 14 March 2025 Part I – Public Fone Station & Off Licence 6 Botwell Lane Hayes UB32AA Sale of alcohol – off sales only Monday to Sunday 08.00 hours to 23.00 hours Papa John’s 8 Botwell Lane Hayes UB32AA Late Night refreshment Sunday - Thursday 23:00 to 02:00 Friday - Saturday 23:00 to 03:00 Best Food & Wine 25 Botwell Lane Hayes UB32AB Sale of alcohol – off sales only Monday to Saturday 08.00 hours to 23.00 hours Sunday 10.00 hours to 22.30 hours Good Friday 08.00 hours to 22.30 hours Christmas Day 12.00 hours to 15.00 hours and 19.00 hours to 22.30 hours 3.6 Operating Schedule and Conditions Section 18 of the operating schedule of the application in Appendix 1 demonstrates the steps the applicant proposes to take to promote the licensing objectives. 4.0 CONSULTATION 4.1 Closing date for representations 14th February 2025. 4.2 Public Notice published in local newspaper 22nd January 2025 – West London Gazette. 5.0 REPRESENTATIONS 5.1 We have received no representations from the Licensing Authority or the Metropolitan Police, acting as Responsible Authorities under the Act. 5.2 We have received representations a local ward Councillor in Janet Gardner, and David Brough on behalf of Hayes Town Ward Safer Neighbourhood Panel. Interested Parties Ground for Representation Appendix Cllr Janet Gardner Prevention of Crime and Disorder Prevention of Public Nuisance Appendix 3 David Brough Prevention of Crime and Disorder Prevention of Public Nuisance Protection of Children from Harm Public Safety Appendix 4 Licensing Sub-Committee – 14 March 2025 Part I – Public 6.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 6.1 A map of the area is attached as Appendix 5. 6.2 A photo of the premises is attached as Appendix 6. 6.3 There have been no recorded Members' Enquires for this premises. 6.4 Hayes Methodist Church is approx. 70 metres from the premises. 7.0 RELEVANT SECTIONS OF S.182 GUIDANCE 7.1 Where representations are made At paragraph 9.3 it states that “Where a representation concerning the licensing objectives is made by a responsible authority about a proposed operating schedule and it is relevant (see paragraphs 9.4 to 9.10), the licensing authority’s discretion will be engaged. It will also be engaged if another person makes relevant representations to the licensing authority, which are also not frivolous or vexatious (see paragraphs 9.4 to 9.10). Relevant representations can be made in opposition to or in support of, an application and can be made by any individual, body or business that has grounds to do so. 7.2 Relevant, vexatious and frivolous representations At paragraph 9.4 it states that “A representation is “relevant” if it relates to the likely effect of the grant of the licence on the promotion of at least one of the licensing objectives. For example, a representation from a local businessperson about the commercial damage caused by competition from new licensed premises would not be relevant. On the other hand, a representation by a businessperson that nuisance caused by new premises would deter customers from entering the local area, and the steps proposed by the applicant to prevent that nuisance were inadequate, would be relevant. In other words, representations should relate to the impact of licensable activities carried on from premises on the objectives. For representations in relation to variations to be relevant, they should be confined to the subject matter of the v ariation. There is no requirement for a responsible authority or other person to produce a recorded history of problems at premises to support their representations, and in fact this would not be possible for new premises.” At paragraph 9.9 it states that “It is recommended that, in borderline cases, the benefit of the doubt about any aspect of a representation should be given to the person making the representation. The subsequent hearing would then provide an opportunity for the person or body making the representation to amplify and clarify it.” 7.3 Determining actions that are appropriate for the promotion of the licensing objectives At paragraph 9.42 it states that "Licensing authorities are best placed to determine what actions are appropriate for the promotion of the licensing objectives in their areas. All licensing determinations should be considered on a case-by-case basis. They should take into account any representations or objections that have been received from responsible authorities or other persons, and representations made by the applicant or premises user as the case may be". At paragraph 9.43 it states that "The authority ’s determination should be evidence -based, justified as being appropriate for the promotion of the licensing objectives and proportionate to what it is intended to achieve". At paragraph 9.44 it states that "Determination of whether an action or step is appropriate for the promotion of the licensing objectives requires an assessment of what action or step would be suitable to achieve that end. While this does not therefore require a licensing authority to decide that no lesser step Licensing Sub-Committee – 14 March 2025 Part I – Public will achieve the aim, the authority should aim to consider the potential burden that the condition would impose on the premises licence holder (such as the financial burden due to restrictions on licensable activities) as well as the potential benefit in terms of the promotion of the licensing objectives. However, the Revised Guidance issued under section 182 of the Licensing Act 2003 informs that it is imperative that the authority ensures that the factors which form the basis of its determination are limited to consideration of the promotion of the objectives and nothing outside those parameters. As with the consideration of licence variations, the licensing authority should consider wider issues such as other conditions already in place to mitigate potential negative impact on the promotion of the licensing objectives and the track record of the business. Further advice on determining what is appropriate when imposing conditions on a licence or certificate is provided in Chapter 10. The licensing authority is expected to come to its determination based on an assessment of the evidence on both the risks and benefits either for or against making the determination". 7.4 Proportionality At paragraph 10.2 it states, “Conditions include any limitations or restrictions attached to a licence or certificate and essentially are the steps or actions that the holder of the premises licence or the club premises certificate will be required to take or refrain from taking in relation to the carrying on of licensable activities at the premises in question. Failure to comply with any condition attached to a licence or certificate is a criminal offence, which on conviction is punishable by an unlimited fine or up to s ix months’ imprisonment. The courts have made clear that it is particularly important that conditions which are imprecise or difficult for a licence holder to observe should be avoided.” At paragraph 10.8 it states, “The licensing authority may not impose any conditions unless its discretion has been exercised following receipt of relevant representations and it is satisfied as a result of a hearing (unless all parties agree a hearing is not necessary) that it is appropriate to impose conditions to promote one or more of the four licensing objectives. In order to promote the crime prevention licensing objective conditions may be included that are aimed at preventing illegal working in licensed premises. This provision also applies to minor variations.” At paragraph 10.9 It is possible that in some cases no additional conditions will be appropriate to promote the licensing objectives. At paragraph 10.10 it states that "The 2003 Act requires that licensing conditions should be tailored to the size, type, location and characteristics and activities taking place at the premises concerned. Conditions should be determined on a case-by-case basis and standardised conditions which ignore these individual aspects should be avoided. For example, conditions should not be used to implement a general policy in a given area such as the use of CCTV, polycarbonate drinking vessels or identity scanners where they would not be appropriate to the specific premises. Conditions that are considered appropriate for the preve ntion of illegal working in premises licensed to sell alcohol or late -night refreshment might include requiring a premises licence holder to undertake right to work checks on all staff employed at the licensed premises or requiring that a copy of any document checked as part of a right to work check, either physical or digital (e.g. copy of any document checked or a clear copy of the online right to work check) is retained at the licensed premises. Licensing authorities and other responsible authorities should be alive to the indirect costs that can arise because of conditions. These could be a deterrent to holding events that are valuable to the community or for the funding of good and important causes. Licensing authorities should therefore ensure that any conditions they impose are only those which are appropriate for the promotion of the licensing objectives". Licensing Sub-Committee – 14 March 2025 Part I – Public 7.5 Hours of Trading At paragraph 10.13 it states "The Government acknowledges that different licensing strategies may be appropriate for the promotion of the licensing objectives in different areas. The 2003 Act gives the licensing authority power to make decisions about the hours during which premises can conduct licensable activities as part of the implementation of its licensing policy statement. Licensing authorities are best placed to make decisions about appropriate opening hours in their areas based on their local knowledge and in consu ltation with responsible authorities. However, licensing authorities must always consider each application and must not impose predetermined licensed opening hours, without giving individual consideration to the merits of each application”. At paragraph 1 0.14 it states, “Where there are objections to an application to extend the hours during which licensable activities are to be carried on and the licensing authority determines that this would undermine the licensing objectives, it may reject the applicati on or grant it with appropriate conditions and/or different hours from those requested.” At paragraph 10.15 it states “Shops, stores and supermarkets should normally be free to provide sales of alcohol for consumption off the premises at any times when the retail outlet is open for shopping unless there are good reasons, based on the licensing objectives, for restricting those hours.” 7.6 Licensing Hours At paragraph 14.51 With regard to licensing hours, the Government acknowledges that different licensing approaches may be appropriate for the promotion of the licensing objectives in different areas. The 2003 Act gives the licensing authority power to make decisions regarding licensed opening hours as part of the implementation of its licensing policy statement and licensing authorities are best placed to make such decisions based on their local knowledge and in consultation with other responsible authorities. However, licensing authorities must always consider each application and must not impose predetermined licensed opening hours, without giving individual consideration to the merits of each application. At paragraph 14.52 Statements of licensing policy should set out the licensing authority’s approach regarding licensed opening hours and the strategy it considers appropriate for the promotion of the licensing objectives in its area. The statement of licensing policy should emphasise the consideration which will be given to the individual merits of an application. The Government recognises that licensed premises make an important contribution to our local communities and has given councils a range of tools to effectively manage the different pressures that licensed premises can bring. In determining appropriate strategies around licensed opening hours, licensing authorities cannot seek to restrict the activities of licensed premises where it is not appropriate for the promotion of the licensing objectives to do so. 7.7 The Need for Licensed Premises At paragraph 14.19 There can be confusion about the difference between the “need” for premises and the “cumulative impact” of premises on the licensing objectives, for example, on crime and disorder. “Need” concerns the commercial demand for another pub or restaurant or hote l and is a matter for the planning authority and for the market. This is not a matter for a licensing authority in discharging its licensing functions or for its statement of licensing policy. 8.0 RELEVANT SECTIONS OF HILLINGDON’S LICENSING POLICY 8.1 Licensing Objectives – The Prevention of Crime and Disorder At paragraph 10.1 Licensed premises, especially those offering late night/early morning entertainment, alcohol and refreshment, can be a source of crime and disorder. The Licensing Authority wil l expect operating schedules to satisfactorily address these issues from the design of the premises through to the daily operation of the business. Applicants are recommended to seek advice from the Police Licensing Officer and Licensing Authority Officers prior to making any application as early advice can alleviate Licensing Sub-Committee – 14 March 2025 Part I – Public representations being made once an application is submitted. Full contact details for both are contained within the Responsible Authorities contact in appendix B. At paragraph 10.3 Where a number of premises may be in close proximity it may be difficult to attribute the disorder to patrons of particular premises, however there is a duty on Premises Licence Holders or Club Management Committees to act responsibly to ensure their own customers do not contribute to crime and disorder whilst in their premises and in the vicinity of their premises. At paragraph 10.6 Applications referred to the Licensing Sub-Committee where relevant representations have been received will be determined on the individual merit of each case. The Licensing Sub-Committee has the power to impose specific conditions when considered appropriate in respect of the Crime and Disorder objective. 8.2 Licensing Objectives – Public Safety At paragraph 11.5 Applications referred to the Licensing Sub -Committee will be determined on the individual merit of each case. The Licensing Sub-Committee have the power to impose specific conditions when considered necessary in respect of the Public Safety objective. 8.3 Licensing Objectives – The Prevention of Public Nuisance At paragraph 12.1 Licensing Sub Committees will be mindful that licensed premises, especially those operating late at night and in the early hours of the morning, can cause a range of nuisances impacting on people living, working or sleeping in the vicinity of the premises. When addressing public nuisance the applicant should identify any particular issues that are likely to affect adversely the promotion of the licensing objective to prevent public nuisance. They should then include in the operating schedule how they will deal with those matters. The concerns mainly relate to noise nuisance from within the premises or from the use of any outside areas, light pollution, smoke and noxious smells. This may also i nclude patrons outside a premises and the dispersal of customers. Due regard will be given to the impact these may have and the Licensing Authority will expect operating schedules to satisfactorily address these issues. At paragraph 12.7 Applications refe rred to the Licensing Sub -Committee will be determined on the individual merit of each case. The Licensing Sub-Committee have the power to impose specific conditions when considered necessary in respect of the Prevention of Public Nuisance objective. 8.4 Licensing Objectives – The Protection of Children from Harm At paragraph 13.7 Applications referred to the Licensing Sub -Committee will be determined on the individual merit of each case. The Licensing Sub -Committee have the power to impose specific conditions when considered necessary in respect of the Protection of Children from Harm objective. 8.5 Representations At paragraph 17.2 Representations can be made to the Council, as Licensing Authority, by a ‘Responsible Authority’ or by ‘Interested Parties’ which include individuals such as residents or bodies such as a resident’s association, trade associations and other businesses operating. Representations can be made concerning:  Applications for new premises licences or club premises certificates  Applications to vary premises licences or club premises certificates  Personal licence applications on criminal grounds (only by the Police) At paragraph 17.9 The Licensing Act 2003 also permits Elected Members to make representations on their own beh alf as well as on behalf of their constituents. Members of the public who are making representations may also request that their Ward Councillor speaks on their behalf at public hearings to determine applications. Licensing Sub-Committee – 14 March 2025 Part I – Public At paragraph 17.11 Written representations include letters and emails. Representations received after the end of the public consultation period cannot legally be accepted and will not be considered by the Licensing Authority. At paragraph 17.12 Representations must contain; a) The name, full address & post code, of the person making them; b) The reasons for their representation; c) Which of the four Licensing Objectives the representation relates to i.e. Crime and disorder; Public Nuisance; Public safety; Protection of children from harm. At paragraph 17.14 Representations based on ‘Need’ for licensed premises, concerns the commercial demand for another pub, restaurant, off licence or hotel. This is not a matter for the licensing authority in discharging its licensing funct ions. ‘Need’ is a matter for planning committees and for the market. Representations made on the basis of need are likely to be rejected. At paragraph 17.15 All valid representations will form part of a committee report that will become a public document. It will be given to the applicant, their agent, responsible authorities, other persons making representations and any other party requesting a copy as well as the Licensing Sub-committee 10 working days prior to the hearing. Anonymous representations will not be accepted. 8.6 Licensing Hours At paragraph 25.1 Prior to the introduction of the Licensing Act 2003, it was believed that fixed and artificially early closing times (established under the Licensing Act 1964) were one of the key causes of rapid binge drinking prior to closing times and one of the causes of disorder and disturbance when large number of customers were required to leave the premises simultaneously. At paragraph 25.2 The aim through promotion of the licensing objectives should be to reduce the potential for concentrations and achieve a slo wer dispersal of people from licensed premises through flexible opening times. At paragraph 25.3 Arbitrary restrictions that would undermine the principle of flexibility will therefore be avoided. The four licensing objectives will be paramount at all times and the Council will always consider the individual merits of each case. At paragraph 25.4 In accordance with guidance there is no fixed restriction on terminal hours for any particular areas of the borough. Such a restriction could cause the migratio n of patrons from one area to another and create the circumstances that the legislation is attempting to avoid. Each application will be dealt with on its merits. It is for the applicants to detail in their Operating Schedule exactly what times they intend to open and close the premises and what measures they will take to ensure that they do not cause nuisance or disturbance to their neighbours in the vicinity. The later the terminal hour applied for, the greater will be the need to address the issues of disturbance and nuisance. At paragraph 25.5 Shops, stores and supermarkets licensed to sell alcohol will normally be allowed to do so for the full duration of their trading hours. Restrictions may be applied, for example where representations are made indicating the particular premises or patrons o f the premises are linked to disorder and or disturbance. 8.7 Licence Conditions At paragraph 20.1 Conditions on premises licences and club certificates are determined by:  The measures put forward on the Operating Schedule  Mandatory conditions within the Act (current list included as Appendix G)  Measures decided at a hearing by the Licensing Sub Committee Licensing Sub-Committee – 14 March 2025 Part I – Public At paragraph 20.2 Conditions attached to licences by the Licensing Authority that have been proposed by the applicant i n their operating schedule should be consistent with the steps set out in the operating schedule. This means that the effect of these conditions should be substantially the same as that intended by the terms of the operating schedule. At paragraph 20.3 Any conditions attached to licences following relevant representations will focus on matters within the control of the Premises Licence Holder or Club Management Committees. They will address matters which have a direct impact on those living, working or engaged in normal activities in the vicinity, as well as patrons of the licensed premises. They will not be used as a means of attempting to attach responsibility to Premises Licence Holders or Club Management Committees for matters outside their reasonable control, such as anti-social behaviour once away from the premises or licensable activity. Conditions imposed by the Licensing Authority shall be appropriate, reasonable, and proportionate and should be determined on a case-by-case basis. At paragraph 20.4 The Licensing Authority will not impose standard conditions upon every licence issued, however it may have regard to model conditions produced by the Government and/or the Institute of Licensing and it may choose to impose these in appropriate circumstances. 9.0 LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS 9.1 When considering an application for a grant of a new Premises Licence, the Sub-Committee shall carry out its functions with a view to taking steps it considers appropriate for promoting the licensing objectives. The licensing objectives are:  Prevention of crime and disorder  Public Safety  Prevention of public nuisance  Protection of children from harm 9.2 Members should note that each objective is of equal importance. There are no other licencing objectives, and the four objectives are paramount considerations at all times. 9.3 An application for a new premises licence may be made pursuant to s.16 and s.17 of the Act, and with regard to the Licensing Act 2003 (Premises licences and club premises certificates) Regulations 2005/42 and the licensing Act 2003 (Fees) Regulations 2005/79. 9.4 The Sub-Committee must ensure that all licensing decisions:  Have a direct relationship to the promotion of one or more of the four licensing objectives  Have regard to the Council's statement of licensing policy  Have regard to the Secretary of State guidance  Must not be subject to a blanket policy to the extent that it is applied so rigidly that an exercise of discretion in each individual case is precluded 9.5 Where relevant representations are made, the Licensing Authority must hold a hearing to determine the application, unless all are agreed that such a hearing is unnecessary s.18(3)(a) Licencing Act 2003. 9.6 Relevant representations are those that relate to the effect of the granting of the application on the promotion of the licensing objectives made by an interested party or responsible authority that have not been withdrawn and are not, in the opinion of the relevant licencing authority, frivolous or vexatious s.18(7) Licensing Act 2003. Licensing Sub-Committee – 14 March 2025 Part I – Public 9.7 The Sub-Committee can only consider matters within the application that have been raised through representations from interested parties and responsible authorities. Interested parties must live within the vicinity of the premises. All applications will be decided on a case-by-case basis. 9.8 Following a hearing, the Sub -Committee must consider all relevant representations, and having taken into account the promotion of the licensing objectives, under s.18(3(b) and (4) Licensing Act 2003, a decision can be taken: - i. To grant the licence, subject to the mandatory conditions and conditions consistent with the operating schedule; ii. To impose additional relevant conditions to such an extent as is considered necessary for the promotion of the licensing objectives; iii. To exclude any of the licensable activities to which the application relates; iv. To amend the times for all or some of the licensable activities; v. To refuse to specify a person in the licence as the premises supervisor; vi. To reject the application. 9.9 Conditions will not be necessary if they duplicate a current statutory requirement. The licencing Authority may therefore only impose such conditions that are necessary to promote the licensing objectives arising out of the consideration of the representations. 9.10 If the Sub -Committee determines that it is necessary to modify the conditions, or to refuse the application for a Premises Licence application, it must give reasons for its decision. 9.11 The Council in its capacity as Licensing Authorit y has a duty to have regard to its public sector equality duty under s.149 of the Equality Act 2010. In summary s.149 provides that a Public Authority must, in the exercise of its functions, have due regard to the need to: i. Eliminate discrimination harassment, victimisation and any other conduct that is prohibited by or under this Act; ii. Advance equality of opportunity between persons who share a relevant protected characteristic and persons who do not share it; and iii. Foster good relations between persons who share relevant protected characteristics and persons who do not. 9.12 Section 149(7) of the Equality Act 2010 defines nine relevant protected characteristics these are: i. age ii. gender reassignment iii. being married or in a civil partnership iv. being pregnant or on maternity leave v. disability vi. race including colour, nationality, ethnic or national origin vii. religion or belief viii. sex ix. sexual orientation 9.13 Officers have provided the Sub -Committee with recommendations related to this application. Subject to the above -mentioned factors having been properly considered, the Sub - Committee may depart from the recommendations if there are good reasons for doing so. The Sub-Committee is advised that such departures could give rise to an appeal or judicial review. 9.14 Interested parties, Responsible Authorities and the Applicant have the right to appeal the decision of the Licensing Sub-Committee to the Magistrates’ Court within a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the applicant was notified by the Licensing Authority of the decision to be appealed against. Licensing Sub-Committee – 14 March 2025 Part I – Public

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

📄 Appendix 1 - Application for the grant of a new premises licence , item 100. PDF 2 MB

📄 Appendix 2 - Plan of premises , item 100. PDF 269 KB

Read the text of this document (1 page)

Hillingdon Council - Licensing plan register number 2356/25 Appendix 2

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

📄 Appendix 3 - Representation from Ward Councillor_Redacted , item 100. PDF 361 KB

Read the text of this document (3 pages)

From: licensing Sent: 20 January 2025 09:02 To: Cllr Janet Gardner ; Cllr Peter Curling ; Cllr Raju Sansarpuri Subject: Late night refreshment application - MCDONALDS HAYES Dear Councillors, LICENSING ACT 2003 As consultees to the licensing process, please be advised that this department has received an application for a new late night refreshments licence for the following premises: MCDONALDS RESTAURANT 22/24 STATION ROAD HAYES UB34DA The application and plan are attached for your review. Please note the timings on the application. The consultation period will end on February 14 th 2025 and any relevant representations to this application must be received by this date. We are unable to accept any representations received after this date or any representations that are not relevant. Relevant representations need to relate to the one or more of the four licensing objectives, which are: · Crime and disorder · Prevention of children from harm · Public safety · Prevention of public nuisance. Please contact the Licensing Service for further information on 01895 277433 or licensing@hillingdon.gov.uk Regards Mark Rose Licensing London Borough of Hillingdon Civic Centre High Street Uxbridge UB8 1UW

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

📄 Appendix 4 - Representation from interested party , item 100. PDF 308 KB

Read the text of this document (3 pages)

Representation Form from Interested Parties (Please read notes on reverse before completing) Your details (See notes 2 & 3); Your Name David Brough Your residential address c/o Botwell Green Library East Avenue Hayes UB3 2HW Your email address Your phone number The name of the body or organisation you represent Hayes Town Ward Safer Neighbourhood Panel About the premises; Name of the premises you are making a representation about McDonald’s Address of the premises you are making a representation about 22-24 Station Road Hayes UB3 4DA The Li censing Objectives (See note 4); Licensing Objective Reasons for your representation and any supporting evidence Please tick;  Prevention of Crime/Disorder  Prevention of Public Nuisance  Protection of Children From Harm  Public Safety The ou tcome you are seeking from the Licensing Authority (See note 6); The Hayes Town Ward Safer Neighbourhood Panel is made up of local residents and representatives of businesses, community groups and places of worship. Our role is to work with the Police Safer Neighbourhood Team and to set their priorities based on our knowledge of the local area. The proposed extension of opening hours by McDonald’s was discussed at our meeting on 22 January 2025 and we agreed to lodge an objection. The premises are popular with the local community but from time to time they become a place for youths to gather both inside and on the pavement outside – and sometimes in the alley to the rear. There have been incidents of anti-social behaviour and on occasions there have been altercations between different groups. In some instances knives have been found as a Appendix 4 5) Upon submitting a representation, it is expected that you will attend the Licensing Sub- Committee hearing to deliver your representation verbally and answer any queries that the Committee may have. If you are unable to attend, your written representation will be considered. 6) You may wish to suggest an outcome to the Licensing Sub- Committee ie. grant the application with extra conditions; grant the application with fewer hours/activities; reject the application. Please note that the Licensing Sub- Committee will only make reasonable and proportionate decisions based upon the evidence they are presented with, and in line with the laws and regulations governing Licensing Hearings. 7) You may continue on separate sheets of paper if necessary and you may also attach any evidence which supports your representation. 8) Please submit all completed forms to: The Licensing Officer Regulatory Services London Borough of Hillingdon Civic Centre High Street Uxbridge, UB8 1UW licensing@hillingdon.gov.uk Tel - 01895 277433 www.hillingdon.gov.uk/licensing

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

📄 Appendix 5- map of the area , item 100. PDF 122 KB

📄 Appendix 6 - photo of the premises , item 100. PDF 326 KB

Page Updated:

The documents made available on this website are all public documents originally published by Hillingdon Council.
This website is an independent resident-led project and is not associated with the London Borough of Hillingdon or Hillingdon Council.
Please join your nearest Residents' Association to keep up-to-date with events in your local community.
For questions, suggestions or complaints about this webpage please get in touch.

Meetings Home | View All Updates | Debug | About

Hillingdon Docs: Home | About
Sections: Decisions | Meetings | News
Planning: Ruislip & Ruislip Manor | Eastcote | Ickenham | South Ruislip | Whole Borough | HMOs