Home Decisions Meetings News
← Back to Licensing

Licensing

Thursday 28th May 2026 • View on LB Hillingdon’s website

► Watch Part 2 on YouTube

Meeting documents
👥 Attendance details📄 Agenda frontsheet PDF 402 KB📦 Agenda reports pack PDF 29 MB📝 Printed draft minutes PDF 369 KB
Read the text of: Agenda frontsheet PDF 402 KB (3 pages)
Lloyd White Head of Democratic Services London Borough of Hillingdon, Phase II, Civic Centre, High Street, Uxbridge, UB8 1UW Putting our residents first NOTICE OF HEARING Licensing Sub- Committee Councillors on the Sub-Committee: Councillor Darran Davies (Chair) Councillor Colleen Sullivan Councillor Matthew Elder IMPORTANT INFORMATION On receipt of this notice, you MUST notify the Comm ittee Cle rk (contact details below) by the following date: Tuesday 26 May 2025 If you don’t notify you may lose your right to speak at the hearing. When notifying you must confirm: 1) Whether you intend to attend or to be represented by someone at the hearing; 2) If you consider a hearing to be unnecessary and; 3) Whether to request that another person attends (other than your representative) as a witness Date: 28 MAY 2026 Time: 10:00 Venue: COMMITTEE ROOM 6 CIVIC CENTRE HIGH STREET UXBRIDGE UB8 1UW Meeting Details: If this is a public hearing, then the public and press are welcome to attend and observe the meeting. For safety and accessibility, security measures will be conducted, including searches of individuals and their belongings. Attendees must also provide satisfactory proof of identity upon arrival. Refusal to comply with these requirements will result in non- admittance. This meeting may be broadcast on the Council’s YouTube channel. You can also view this agenda online at www.hillingdon.gov.uk Published: Tuesday, 12 May 2026 Contact: Democratic Services Email: democratic@hillingdon.gov.uk Useful information for residents and visitors Watching & recording this meeting (if a public meeting only) If this meeting is to be held in Public (Part 1) you can watch it on the Council's YouTube channel, live or archived after the meeting. Residents and the media are also welcome to attend in person, and if they wish, report on the public part of the meeting. Any individual or organisation may record or film proceedings as long as it does not disrupt proceedings. It is recommended to give advance notice of filming to ensure any particular requirements can be met. The Council will provide seating areas for residents/public, high speed WiFi access to all attending and an area for the m edia to report. The officer shown on the front of this agenda should be contacted for further information and will be available to assist. When present in the room, silent mode should be enabled for all mobile devices. Travel and parking Bus routes 427, U1, U3, U4 and U7 all stop at the Civic Centre. Uxbridge underground station, with the Piccadilly and Metropolitan lines, is a short walk away. Limited parking is availabl e at the Civic Centre. For details on availability and how to book a parking space, please contact Democratic Services. Please enter via main reception and visit the security desk to sign-in and collect a visitor’s pass. You will then be directed to the Committee Room. Accessibility For accessibility options regarding this agenda pl ease contact Democratic Services. For those hard of hearing an Induction Loop System is available for use. Emergency procedures If there is a FIRE, you will hear a cont inuous alarm. Please follow the signs to the nearest FIRE EXIT and assemble on the C ivic Centre forecourt. Lifts must not be used unless instructed by a Fire Marshal or Security Officer. In the event of a SECURITY INCIDENT, follow instructions issued via the tannoy, a Fire Marshal or a Security Officer. Those unable to evacuate using the stairs, should make their way to the signed refuge locations. Agenda CHAIRMAN'S ANNOUNCEMENTS Hearing Protocol 1 Apologies for Absence 2 Declarations of interest in matters coming before this meeting 3 To confirm that the items of business marked Part I will be considered in Public and items marked Part II will be considered in Private 4 Matters that have been notified in advance or urgent Part I - Members, Public and Press Title of Report / Address of application Ward Time Page 5 Application for the grant of a Premises Licence - The Smoking Jacket, The Old Forge, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood HA6 2QN Northwood 10:00 3 - 98

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

Read the text of: Printed draft minutes PDF 369 KB (10 pages)
Minutes LICENSING SUB-COMMITTEE 28 May 2026 Meeting held at Committee Room 6 - Civic Centre, High Street, Uxbridge UB8 1UW Committee Members Present: Councillors Darran Davies Colleen Sullivan Matthew Elder LBH Officers Present: Dave Butler, Licensing Officer Liz Penny, Democratic Services Officer Georgina Cotterell, Legal Advisor Applicant: Ms Sonal Mehta Applicant’s representative Mr Edward Bryan Interested parties Mr Trevor Sherling (Northwood Residents’ Association) Mr Richard Farmery Mr David Sandler Mr Mike Hutter 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE (Agenda Item 1) There were no apologies for absence. 2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST IN MATTERS COMING BEFORE THIS MEETING (Agenda Item 2) There were no declarations of interest. 3. TO CONFIRM THAT THE ITEMS OF BUSINESS MARKED PART I WILL BE CONSIDERED IN PUBLIC AND ITEMS MARKED PART II WILL BE CONSIDERED IN PRIVATE (Agenda Item 3) It was confirmed that all items of business were marked Part I and would be considered in public. 4. MATTERS THAT HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED IN ADVANCE OR URGENT (Agenda Item 4) None. 5. APPLICATION FOR THE GRANT OF A PREMISES LICENCE - THE SMOKING JACKET, THE OLD FORGE, RICKMANSWORTH ROAD, NORTHWOOD HA6 2QN (Agenda Item 5) INTRODUCTION Dave Butler, Licensing Officer at the London Borough of Hillingdon, introduced the report relating to the applica tion for the grant of a Premises Licence in respect of the Smoking Jacket, The Old Forge, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood HA6 2QN. Members heard that the application, made by A&P Meta Limited, sought authorisation for the sale of alcohol for consumption bot h on and off the premises, with proposed opening hours that had been amended following discussions with the licensing authority. The application had been received and duly advertised in accordance with statutory requirements, and a site visit confirmed tha t public notices had been correctly displayed. Nine representations had been received from local residents, and although mediation had been attempted, agreement had not been reached; however, representations from the licensing authority had been withdrawn following amendments to the operating schedule. No other responsible authorities had submitted representations, and no complaints or Member enquiries had been received. It was confirmed that a late submission from a Ward Councillor had not been accepted as it had fallen outside the consultation period. APPLICANT The applicant, Ms Sonal Mehta, and her representative were in attendance and addressed the Sub -Committee Members. Ms Mehta confirmed that the proposal to establish The Smoking Jacket in Northwoo d had been informed by 15 years of experience within the cigar industry and the operation of an established family business with three existing premises in Kensington. Ms Mehta noted that she was a local resident with a personal connection to the area and that the proposed premises would operate as an experience -led retail space rather than a bar or nightclub, with an emphasis on providing a calm environment for the appreciation of artisanal products and community interaction. It was highlighted that no responsible authorities had raised objections to the application, and that a representation submitted by the licensing authority had been withdrawn following the agreement of a comprehensive set of conditions. These included measures such as a 22:00 exter nal curfew, capacity limits, a dispersal policy, CCTV provision, incident logging, Challenge 25, and restrictions on children, all of which had been offered voluntarily. It was further noted that other licensed premises in the area operated with later hour s than those proposed, and that additional safeguarding measures, including an “Ask for Angela” policy, would be implemented. The applicant expressed confidence that the premises would promote the licensing objectives and contribute positively to the local community. In response to questions from the Sub -Committee, it was clarified that the proposed terminal hours of 22:30 and 23:30 related to the cessation of alcohol sales, with the premises remaining open for a further 30-minute period to allow for closing procedures, resulting in later overall closing times. It was further confirmed that no representations had been received from any responsible authorities. INTERESTED PARTIES Objections had been received from nine interested parties, four of whom wer e in attendance. Mr Trevor Sherling of Northwood Residents Association was the first to address the Sub-Committee:  It was stated that a further objection had been submitted on 12 May, although it had not been included in the current papers, and it was ac knowledged that this had been received after the objection deadline. It was noted that a number of points raised had already been set out in that submission.  Mr Sherling addressed the Committee on behalf of the Northwood Residents Association (NRA) stating that the NRA objected to the granting of the alcohol licence on the basis that the location was inappropriate, being situated between residential properties rather than within a retail area. It was argued that the applicant should respect the residential nature of the area and avoid imposing adverse living conditions on neighbouring residents.  It was highlighted that the proposal differed from typical premises located above or within retail units, and that licences for alcohol sales in locations where the primary business was not food -led (such as restaurants, pubs, or wine bars) were considered unusual. Concern was expressed that the proposed opening hours more closely resembled those of a drinking establishment than a retail unit.  Questions were raised re garding the planning use of the premises, noting that the property had previously operated as a car showroom and an architect’s office, neither of which fell within a retail use class. While it was acknowledged that planning matters were outside the scope of the hearing, it was stated that this issue could be pursued separately.  Concerns were raised regarding the potential for criminal activity, specifically drink driving, in addition to public nuisance. It was emphasised that legal alcohol limits for drivi ng were maximum thresholds rather than targets, and that impairment could occur even below these limits.  It was suggested that the customer base would likely consist of individuals travelling independently, rather than groups, due to the nature of the busi ness and its location. Given the limited public transport and non -retail setting, it was considered likely that customers would travel by car. It was therefore argued that, unlike typical hospitality settings, there would be no designated non - drinking driver, increasing the likelihood of drink driving.  It was further argued that the proposed use could inadvertently facilitate drink driving due to its location away from a retail centre and limited accessibility by public transport, in contrast to the applica nt’s other premises located in central London.  Concerns were also raised regarding public nuisance arising from smoking, with the expectation that this would generate noise outside the premises. It was stated that such noise could adversely affect neighbouring residential properties, particularly given the proposal for up to 24 customers to drink outside, and the limited ability to control noise from conversations.  It was proposed that operating conditions should reflect the residential setting, including r estrictions on external drinking to 18:00 Monday to Saturday and 16:00 on Sundays and bank holidays, and that windows and doors should remain closed to prevent noise escape.  The NRA concluded that the licence for on -site drinking should not be granted, asserting that residents relied on the Council to protect them from potential nuisance.  In the event that the licence were granted, it was proposed that operating hours should be limited to 22:00 Monday to Saturday and 20:00 on Sundays and bank holidays, with stricter limits on outdoor drinking. Where separate indoor and outdoor hours could not be conditioned, it was suggested that the earlier times should apply to the entire licence.  It was also proposed that alcohol consumption be restricted to one standard drink per customer (e.g. a 25 ml measure of whisky) to discourage drink driving, and that consideration be given to the shared responsibility of both the business and the local authority in discouraging such behaviour.  It was noted that, aside from smoking -related impacts, other retail uses would not typically result in noise affecting neighbouring residents, as activity would primarily take place indoors Mr Mike Hutter, local resident, was also in attendance and raised the following points:  Mr Hutter int roduced himself as a property owner within Two Lovers Court and as a Director of TLC Property Company (Northwood) Limited, representing both the residents’ association and local residents.  The proposal was described as an unwelcome combination of elements within what was characterised as a highly residential area.  The layout of the site was explained as being complex, with properties positioned in an overlapping, “jigsaw -like” arrangement rather than in a straightforward or perpendicular configuration, increasing the potential for impact on neighbouring properties.  It was emphasised that the site was situated between residential properties, including a block and nearby cottages, and that such a proposal was considered highly unusual for this type of setting.  Concern was expressed that the application combined several elements — namely the sale and consumption of alcohol, smoking, access for children, extended operating hours, potential noise, and limited parking —which were considered inappropriate when taken together in a residential location.  The cumulative effect of these factors was described as fundamentally unsuitable for the area, with the suggestion that they were “inextricably linked” and collectively problematic.  In conclusion, the proposal was strongly criticised as being detrimental to residents, and it was asserted that the Council should prioritise protecting local residents from such impacts Mr Richard Farmery, local resident, was in attendance and addressed the Sub - Committee highlighting the following:  Mr Farmery was a resident of Myrtleside Close, located immediately opposite the application site.  Doubt was expressed regarding the applicant’s ability to accurately quantify the volume of alcohol to be consumed on the premises, especially when comp ared with her other premises, which did not permit simultaneous drinking in the same way.  Concern was raised that cigar smoke, combined with outdoor alcohol consumption, would create a public nuisance, with odours likely to permeate the surrounding residential area and be exacerbated by customers drinking outside.  The residential nature of the area and the limited availability of parking were reiterated as concerns, although it was acknowledged that parking fell outside the licensing authority’s remit.  Issues relating to public safety were highlighted, particularly the risk of drink driving. It was noted that there had already been complaints and police action relating to speeding in the area, and that vehicle speeds remained a concern despite the site being within the ULEZ zone.  Attention was drawn to the applicant company’s classification under the Companies Act as “other business support activities,” rather than a retail category more typically associated with the sale of food, beverages, or tobacco. This raised concerns as to whether the company was an appropriate operator for a licensed premises.  It was acknowledged positively that the proposal would bring a currently unused building back into active use, which was considered beneficial given its previous vacancy.  It was stated that there would have been no objection if the proposal had been limited solely to the sale of tobacco; however, the combination of tobacco use with on-site alcohol consumption was the central concern. The Committee was requested not to approve the licence Mr David Sandler, local resident, was also in attendance but had no additional concerns to raise. The Chair clarified that the Committee’s role was to assess the application solely against the licensing objectives, rather than t he applicant’s business structure or registration. He thanked all those who had made representations. DISCUSSION The below key points were noted during the discussion stage of the hearing.  Members asked when staff training would be implemented, and it was confirmed that the applicant would initially operate the premises herself, with staff training to be introduced as the business developed and conducted on a six -monthly basis covering health and safety and related matters.  In response to questions from the Sub -Committee, it was explained that the premises would be limited in size, comprising a walk -in humidor, retail shelving, and a small seating area for approximately 10 –12 patrons, subject to the final layout.  Councillors enquired about anticipated cu stomer levels during the week and raised concerns regarding car usage and potential drink driving. The Chair clarified that drink driving did not fall directly within the licensing objectives, although public safety remained relevant. The applicant advised that demand could not yet be predicted given the new concept within the Borough, but referred to nearby amenities and potential clientele, and confirmed the availability of alternative transport options including buses, taxis and rail services, with public transport accessibility assessed as moderate to strong.  An interested party sought clarification on the proportion of sales attributable to retail, on-site alcohol and tobacco. It was stated that approximately 60% of sales were expected to be derived fro m cigars, although this could vary significantly due to the range in pricing. In response to questions regarding the viability of the business model, it was confirmed that precise projections were not available for a new venture, although confidence in dem and had been informed by customer interest and the absence of comparable local establishments.  Councillors asked how the applicant would manage her responsibilities across multiple venues. It was confirmed that the existing premises were well established and that the applicant intended to be present at the new premises for the majority of the time, particularly during its initial operation.  In response to further questions regarding noise control and staff management, it was confirmed that a noise limiter w ould not be installed initially due to cost, but that mitigations would include closure of the external area at 22:00, implementation of dispersal and wind -down procedures, advance notification to customers prior to closing, the use of signage requesting c onsideration for neighbours, controlled customer departure, prohibition of open containers leaving the premises, and the logging of incidents.  Members sought clarification regarding children on the premises, and it was confirmed that children would not be permitted in outdoor areas and would only be allowed indoors until 20:00 when accompanied by a responsible adult, with a Challenge 25 policy in operation and no sales to minors.  Councillors enquired whether the premises would be used for private functions. It was confirmed that this had not yet been considered and that the applicant’s existing venues operated solely as retail spaces.  In response to questions regarding alcohol sales at other venues, it was confirmed that while cigars were sold in greater vol ume, higher -value cigars could exceed alcohol sales in monetary terms, and that a policy would require customers to purchase cigars on -site if they wished to smoke them at the premises.  Members queried how access to the premises would be managed in the absence of a membership scheme or door staff. It was confirmed that CCTV would be installed and retained for a period of 31 days, accessible to relevant authorities, and that staff would be trained in its operation. It was further advised that a membership or formal vetting system was not proposed, although identification checks would be undertaken in accordance with a Challenge 25 policy.  In response to further questions regarding security measures and identification at peak times, it was stated that door staff were not considered necessary due to the limited size and nature of the premises, and that staff would monitor customer numbers in outdoor areas. Acceptable forms of identification were confirmed to include passports and driving licences.  In addressing concerns regarding the inclusion of both on - and off -licence provisions, it was explained that the off -sales element was intended to provide a specialist retail offer comparable to boutique establishments, enabling customers to purchase premium products locally.  It was additionally noted that no objections had been raised by the police in relation to crime and disorder, and that, on this basis, no further security measures had been proposed CLOSING REMARKS In their closing remarks, the interested parties concluded that the proposal remained unsuitable for the premises, with concerns reiterated that the location was residential rather than retail in character, that a number of significant issues remained unresolve d - including the business model, operating arrangements, and mitigation measures - and that the combination of alcohol, smoking, children, limited parking, and site layout could give rise to adverse impacts, particularly in relation to noise and public nuisance . Ongoing concern was also expressed r egarding the likelihood of customers travelling by car and the associated risk of drink driving in this specific location. The Licensing Officer noted that concerns relating to drink driving offences, as governed by the Road Traffic Act, could be address ed through appropriate or recommended licence conditions, including responsible retailing practices, the provision of water and coffee, and staff training supported by refusal and incident logs; it was also clarified that any reference to club -style premises would require a separate application for a club premises The applicant affirmed that she wished to work collaboratively with neighbouring residents and the licensing authority to introduce a high -quality and diverse business offering to the Northwood area, emphasising that no harm was intended and that a positive, long-term relationship with the community was sought. It was further clarified by the applicant’s representative that non -alcoholic options, including coffee and soft drinks, would also be av ailable, and that permission for the premises to operate as a retail unit remained valid under its most recent lawful use classification. It was also noted that the premises had no residential accommodation directly above it and that nearby neighbouring pr operties were not immediately attached, with it being observed that the closest cottages had not raised objections. There were no further closing remarks. COMMITTEE DELIBERATION All parties were thanked for attending and were asked to leave the room while the Sub- Committee considered its decision. All parties were invited back to the meeting for the Chairman to announce the decision of the Sub-Committee. THE DECISION The Sub-Committee considered all relevant evidence made available to it and in doing so took the following into account: • Licensing Objectives, Licensing Act 2003 • Hillingdon's Licensing Policy • Statutory Guidance issued by the Secretary of State under s.182 of the Licensing Act 2003 The Sub -Committee took into consideration all repr esentations made both oral and written. The decision of the Sub -Committee is to GRANT the application of A & P Mehta Limited for a Premises Licence for sale of alcohol for consumption both on and off the premises. CONDITIONS The Sub-Committee welcomed the conditions agreed by the Applicant and their willingness to commit to the licensing objectives at all times. The following conditions are to be attached to the new premises licence: The operating hours of the business shall be: Monday to Thursday 10.00 to 22.30 Friday, Saturday 09.00 to 23.30 Sunday 09.00 to 22.30 Bank Holidays 09.00 to 22.30 The sale of alcohol will cease 30 minutes before closing time. 1. A Challenge 25 policy shall be operated at the premi ses. Any person who appears to be under 25 years of age shall be required to produce valid photographic identification (passport, driving licence, or PASS -accredited proof-of-age card) before being served alcohol. 2. Challenge 25 signage shall be prominently displayed at the point of sale and at the entrance to the premises. All staff involved in the sale of alcohol shall receive Challenge 25 training before being permitted to make sales, and refresher training shall be provided at intervals of no more than s ix months. Training records shall be kept and made available for inspection by an authorised officer of the Council or the Police. 3. A refusals register shall be maintained at the premises, recording all instances where the sale of alcohol has been refused on the grounds of age. The register shall include the date, time, description of the individual, and the name of the staff member who refused the sale. 4. Children (persons under 18) shall NOT be permitted to enter or remain on the premises at any time durin g the premises’ designated business opening hours. 5. The Premises Licence Holder shall adopt and implement the “Ask for Angela” scheme. All relevant members of staff shall receive appropriate training in relation to the operation of the scheme, including ho w to recognise and respond to individuals who may be at risk of harm, harassment, or distress. Such training shall be provided prior to the member of staff undertaking duties involving interaction with the public and shall be refreshed at regular intervals . The Premises Licence Holder shall ensure that clea r and visible signage is displayed within the Premises to inform patrons of the availability of the scheme. A written record of staff training shall be maintained and made available for inspection by a co nstable or an authorised officer of the Council upon request. 6. The Premises shall be equipped with a functioning and properly maintained closed -circuit television (CCTV) system, which shall be in continuous operation at all times during which the Premises are open to the public. A member of staff who is suitably trained in the operation and use of the CCTV system shall be present on the Premises at all times during such hours of operation. Such staff member shall be capable of promptly accessing, retrieving , and producing CCTV footage and associated data. Copies of rec ent CCTV images or recorded data shall be made available to a constable or duly authorised officer of the Council upon request and with the minimum practicable delay 7. An incident log shall be kept at the premises and made available on request to an authorised officer of the Council or the Police. It will record the following: a. all crimes reported to the venue b. any complaints received concerning crime and disorder c. any incidents of disorder d. any faults in the CCTV system, e. any refusal of the sale of alcohol f. any visit by a relevant authority or emergency service. 8. The maximum number of persons permitted in the pergola area at any one time shall be 12. 9. The maximum number of persons permitted in the rear garden area at any one time shall be 12. 10. The use of all external areas (including the pergola and rear garden) for the consumption of alcohol, or for smoking, shall cease 30 minutes before closing. 11. The premises licence holder shall implement and maintain a dispersal policy for the premises. The policy shall be kept at the premises and be made available upon request to an authorised officer of a responsible authority under the Licensing Act 2003 12. Signage shall be displayed at the exit requesting t hat customers respect the neighbourhood and leave quietly. REASONS The Sub -Committee recognise that this is a new application for a premises licence for the sale of alcohol on and off the premises. The applicant in submissions demonstrated sound knowl edge, understanding and experience of the licensing objectives. The Sub -Committee considered representations made by local residents, in particular those submitted by the Northwood Residence Association. The Sub -Committee determined that relevant re presentations are those that relate to the effect of the granting of the application on the promotion of the licensing objectives. The sub-committee determined that ‘need’ for this type of business, was not a relevant licensing consideration as per paragr aph 14.19 of the statutory guidance. In addition, the Borough does not have a cumulative policy in place. The Sub-Committee carefully considered all representations made in respect of the proposed operational hours of the Premises. Having had regard to th e evidence presented, the Sub -Committee determined it appropriate to amend the hours sought within the operating schedule. In light of those amendments, the Sub-Committee is satisfied that the revised operating hours are proportionate and appropriate for the promotion of the licensing objectives. The Sub -Committee gave due consideration to representations received concerning the presence of children on the Premises. Accordingly, the Sub - Committee determined that no person under the age of eighteen (18) yea rs shall be permitted to enter or remain on the premises at any time during the operational hours. The Sub -Committee considered this condition necessary and proportionate for the promotion of the licensing objective relating to the protection of children from harm. Having considered all the evidence before it, both written and oral, the Sub - Committee determined that the conditions imposed on the licence are appropriate and proportionate to address concerns relating to public nuisance. The Sub -Committee is further satisfied that the Applicant will promote and comply with the licensing objectives. The Sub -Committee is satisfied that any individual who contravenes parking restrictions is personally accountable for such conduct under the law. This approach accords with the Section 182 Guidance. RIGHT OF APPEAL The relevant applicant for the premises licence or any other person who made relevant representations to the application may appeal against the Council’s decision to the Justices Clerk at the Uxbridge Magistrates Court. Such an appeal may be brought within 21 days of receipt of this Notice of Decision. No decision made by the Council will have effect during the time period within which an appeal may be brought and until such time that any appeal ha s been determined or abandoned. The Sub -Committee advises as a comfort to residents and a warning to the licensee that the licence may be reviewed and could potentially be revoked if licence conditions are not adhered to and/or if the premises are managed in a manner which does not uphold the licensing objectives The Applicant will be deemed to have received this decision letter, two days after the date on the accompanying letter, which will be posted by 1st class mail. This decision Noice will be circulated to all parties within 5 working days. The meeting, which commenced at 10.03 am, closed at 12.12 pm. These are the minutes of the above meeting. For more information on any of the resolutions please contact Liz Penny - email: democratic@hillingdon.gov.uk on . Circulation of these minutes is to Councillors, Off icers, the Press and Members of the Public. The public part of this meeting was filmed live on the Council's YouTube Channel to increase transparency in decision -making; however, these minutes remain the official and definitive record of proceedings.

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

Attendance
Present: Councillor Darran Davies, Councillor Colleen Sullivan, Councillor Matthew Elder, Dave Butler, Liz Penny, Georgina Cotterell

Agenda

1. Apologies for Absence
There were no apologies for absence.
2. Declarations of interest in matters coming before this meeting
There were no declarations of interest.
3. To confirm that the items of business marked Part I will be considered in Public and items marked Part II will be considered in Private
It was confirmed that all items of business were marked Part I and would be considered in public.
4. Matters that have been notified in advance or urgent
None.
5. Application for the grant of a Premises Licence - The Smoking Jacket, The Old Forge, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood HA6 2QN PDF 345 KB
INTRODUCTION Dave Butler, Licensing Officer at the London Borough of Hillingdon, introduced the report relating to the application for the grant of a Premises Licence in respect of the Smoking Jacket, The Old Forge, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood HA6 2QN. Members heard that the application, made by A&P Meta Limited, sought authorisation for the sale of alcohol for consumption both on and off the premises, with proposed opening hours that had been amended following discussions with the licensing authority. The application had been received and duly advertised in accordance with statutory requirements, and a site visit confirmed that public notices had been correctly displayed. Nine representations had been received from local residents , and although mediation had been attempted, agreement had not been reached; however, representations from the licensing authority had been withdrawn following amendments to the operating schedule. No other responsible authorities had submitted representations, and no complaints or Member enquiries had been received. It was confirmed that a late submission from a Ward Councillor had not been accepted as it had fallen outside the consultation period. APPLICANT The applicant, Ms Sonal Mehta, and her representative were in attendance and addressed the Sub-Committee Members. Ms Mehta confirmed that the proposal to establish The Smoking Jacket in Northwood had been informed by 15 years of experience within the cigar industry and the operation of an established family business with three existing premises in Kensington. Ms Mehta noted that she was a local resident with a personal connection to the area and that the proposed premises would operate as an experience-led retail space rather than a bar or nightclub, with an emphasis on providing a calm environment for the appreciation of artisanal products and community interaction. It was highlighted that no responsible authorities had raised objections to the application, and that a representation submitted by the licensing authority had been withdrawn following the agreement of a comprehensive set of conditions. These included measures such as a 22:00 external curfew, capacity limits, a dispersal policy, CCTV provision, incident logging, Challenge 25, and restrictions on children, all of which had been offered voluntarily. It was further noted that other licensed premises in the area operated with later hours than those proposed, and that additional safeguarding measures, including an “Ask for Angela” policy, would be implemented. The applicant expressed confidence that the premises would promote the licensing objectives and contribute positively to the local community. In response to questions from the Sub-Committee, it was clarified that the proposed terminal hours of 22:30 and 23:30 related to the cessation of alcohol sales, with the premises remaining open for a further 30-minute period to allow for closing procedures, resulting in later overall closing times. It was further confirmed that no representations had been received from any responsible authorities. INTERESTED PARTIES Objections had been received from nine interested parties, four of whom were in attendance. Mr Trevor Sherling of Northwood Residents Association was the first to address the Sub-Committee: It was stated that a further objection had ... view the full minutes text for item 5.
📄 Application for the grant of a Premises Licence - The Smoking Jacket, The Old Forge, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood HA6 2QN PDF 345 KB
Read the text of this document (17 pages)
Licensing Sub-Committee hearing – 28 May 2026 Part I - Public Application for the grant of a Premises Licence The Smoking Jacket, The Old Forge, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood HA6 2QN Committee Licensing Sub-Committee Officer Contact Licensing Officer – Austen Young - 01895 556533 Papers with report Appendix 1 - Application form and plan Appendix 2 - Map of the location Appendix 3 - Photographs of the premises Appendix 4 - Residents’ representations Appendix 5 - Applicant’s response to representations Ward name Northwood 1.0 SUMMARY To consider an application for the grant of a new Premises Licence in respect of The Smoking Jacket, The Old Forge, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood HA6 2QN . The application form and plan are appended as Appendix 1. The application has attracted representations from local residents objecting to the application. 2.0 RECOMMENDATION That the Licensing Sub -Committee considers this application for the grant of a new Premises Licence in respect of The Smoking Jacket, The Old Forge, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood HA6 2QN. 3.0 APPLICATION 3.1 Type of Application New Premises Licence application pursuant to s.17 of the Licensing Act 2003 submitted by A & P Mehta Limited. The application form and accompanying plan are attached at Appendix 1. 3.2 Proposed Licensable Activities The application is seeking a licence to authorise the sale of alcohol for consumption both on and off the premises. 3.3 Proposed Hours Supply of Alcohol Opening Hours Monday 10:00 – 22:30 10:00 – 23:00 Tuesday 10:00 – 22:30 10:00 – 23:00 Wednesday 10:00 – 22:30 10:00 – 23:00 Thursday 10:00 – 22:30 10:00 – 23:00 Friday 09:00 – 23:30 09:00 – 00:00 Saturday 09:00 – 23:30 09:00 – 00:00 Sunday 09:00 – 22:30 09:00 – 23:00 Licensing Sub-Committee hearing – 28 May 2026 Part I - Public The proposed hours were amended following discussions with the Licensing Authority. The amendments will be fully covered later in the report. 3.4 Non-Standard Timings In addition to the standard hours proposed in paragraph 3.3, the application also reque sts the following non-standard timings: Christmas Eve Sale of alcohol – until 01:00 on Christmas Day Opening hours – until 01:00 on Christmas Day New Year’s Eve Sale of alcohol - until 01:00 on New Year’s Day Opening hours – until 01:00 on New Year’s Day 3.5 Description of the Premises The premises is a standalone commercial unit and not currently trading. The immediate vicinity is characterised predominately by residential properties, but the property is located near to mixed commercial, hospitality and educational properties, including a car dealership, hand car wash, a golf club, the Grange entertainment venue , and four educational establishments. 3.6 A map of the location is included at Appendix 2. 3.7 Photographs of the premises and the immediate surrounding area are included at Appendix 3. 3.8 Operating Schedule Section 18 of the operating schedule of the application form at Appendix 1 demonstrates the steps the applicant proposes to take to promote the licensing objectives. 3.9 Other Licensed Premises Nearby Premises Licensable Activities Licensed Hours Northwood Golf Club Rickmansworth Road Northwood HA6 2QW Provision of regulated entertainment (films; live music; recorded music; dance; activities similar to live music, recorded music and dance) Provision of late-night refreshment Sale of alcohol by retail Supply of alcohol to club members Regulated entertainment, Monday to Saturday 11:00 to 00:00, Sunday 11:00 to 23:00 Late night refreshment, Monday to Sunday 23:00 to 01:00 Sale of alcohol, Monday to Sunday 11:00 to 00:00 Supply of alcohol to club members, Monday to Saturday 11:00 to 00:00, Sunday 11:00 to 23:00 Licensing Sub-Committee hearing – 28 May 2026 Part I - Public The Grange Rickmansworth Road Northwood HA6 2RB Provision of regulated entertainment (recorded music only) Provision of late-night refreshment Sale of alcohol by retail Recorded music, Monday to Thursday 23:00 to 23:30, Friday and Saturday 10:00 to 00:30, Sunday 23:00 to 23:30 Late night refreshment, Monday to Thursday 23:00 to 23:30, Friday and Saturday 23:00 to 00:30, Sunday 23:00 to 23:30 hours Sale of alcohol, Monday to Thursday 10:00 to 23:00, Friday and Saturday 10:00 to 00:00, Sunday 12:00 to 23:00 The Gate Rickmansworth Road Northwood HA6 2RH Provision of late-night refreshment Sale of alcohol by retail Late night refreshment, Monday to Sunday 23:00 to 00:00 Sale of alcohol, Monday to Sunday 10:00 to 00:00 The Three Wishes 27 Green Lane Northwood HA6 2PX Provision of regulated entertainment (live music; recorded music; performances of dance; activities similar to live music, recorded music and dance) Provision of late-night refreshment Sale of alcohol by retail Regulated entertainment, 10:00 to 00:00 Monday to Saturday, 12:00 to 00:00 Sunday Late night refreshment, Monday to Sunday 23:00 to 00:00 Sale of alcohol, Monday to Saturday 10:00 to 00:00, Sunday 12:00 to 00:00 4.0 CONSULTATION 4.1 Closing date for representations 29th April 2026 4.2 Public Notice published in local newspaper 8th April 2026 5.0 REPRESENTATIONS 5.1 Representations have been received from the following residents acting as interested parties. The residents’ representations are attached at Appendix 4A through 4I for reference. Licensing Sub-Committee hearing – 28 May 2026 Part I - Public Appendix Name Address Grounds of Objection 4A M Addison Rickmansworth Road, Northwood Prevention of public nuisance 4B R Farmery Myrtleside Close, Northwood Prevention of public nuisance 4C J Kidson (on behalf of residents of True Lovers Court) Waldens Road, Woking Prevention of public nuisance Prevention of crime and disorder 4D M & D Sandler True Lovers Court, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood Prevention of public nuisance 4E L Stevens True Lovers Court, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood Prevention of public nuisance 4F Mr & Mrs Thakerar Rickmansworth Road, Northwood Prevention of public nuisance Prevention of crime and disorder 4G TLC Property Company (Northwood) Ltd Prevention of crime and disorder Prevention of public nuisance 4H P Wachtel True Lovers Court, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood Prevention of public nuisance 4I Northwood Residents’ Assocation Prevention of public nuisance 5.2 As part of attempted mediation in this case, comments from the applicant were forwarded to these parties providing further details on the operation of the premises and proposed controls on the outside areas. Where additional comments have been received from these parties in replying to this correspondence within the consultation period, and where these comments add to or expand upon their original representations, these have been included in addition to their original comments. 5.3 Representations were also received from the Licensing Authority, proposing additional controls and clarity over the steps proposed in the applicant’s operating schedule. Following agreement to amend the application, these representations were subsequently withdrawn. The application was amended as follows:  The alcohol hours were amended to allow for alcohol sales to cease 30 minutes before the premises closes. The proposed hours for the sale of alcohol are now 10:00 to 22:30 Monday to Thursday, 09:00 to 23:30 Friday and Saturday, and 09:00 to 22:30 Sunday. The proposed opening hours remain unchanged.  The following conditions were agreed to be attached to any licence granted as a result of this application: 1. The premises licence holder shall implement and maintain a dispersal policy for the premises. The policy shall be kept at the premises and be made available upon request to an authorised officer of a responsible authority under the Licensing Act 2003 Licensing Sub-Committee hearing – 28 May 2026 Part I - Public 2. Signage shall be displayed at the exit requesting that customers respect the neighbourhood and leave quietly. 3. A staff member from the premises who is conversant with the operation of the CCTV system shall be on the premises at all times when the premises is open. This staff member must be able to provide a Police or authorised council officer copies of recent CCTV images or data with the absolute minimum of delay when requested. 4. An incident log shall be kept at the premises and made available on request to an authorised officer of the Council or the Police. It will record the following: (a) all crimes reported to the venue (b) any complaints received concerning crime and disorder (c) any incidents of disorder (d) any faults in the CCTV system, (e) any refusal of the sale of alcohol (f) any visit by a relevant authority or emergency service. 5. The maximum number of persons permitted in the pergola area at any one time shall be 12. 6. The maximum number of persons permitted in the rear garden area at any one time shall be 12. 7. The use of all external areas (including the pergola and rear garden) for the consumption of alcohol, or for smoking, shall cease at 22:00 hours 8. Children (persons under 18) shall be permitted to enter the internal areas of the premises only until the hours of 20:00 when they will not be permitted. Within the permitted hours they must be accompanied and supervised at all times by a responsible adult. 9. Children shall not be permitted in any external smoking area at any time. 10. A Challenge 25 policy shall be operated at the premises. Any person who appears to be under 25 years of age shall be required to produce valid photographic identification (passport, driving licence, or PASS-accredited proof- of-age card) before being served alcohol. 11. All staff involved in the sale of alcohol shall receive Challenge 25 training before being permitted to make sales, and refresher training shall be provided at intervals of no more than six months. Training records shall be kept and made available for inspection by an authorised officer of the Council or the Police. 12. A refusals register shall be maintained at the premises, recording all instances where the sale of alcohol has been refused on the grounds of age. The register shall include the date, time, descri ption of the individual, and the name of the staff member who refused the sale. 13. Challenge 25 signage shall be prominently displayed at the point of sale and at the entrance to the premises. 5.4 Confirmation of the amended hours and agreed conditions were circulated to the residents to keep them updated on the application. 5.5 No representations have been received from any other responsible authority. 5.6 No Members’ Enquiries have been received by the licensing service for this premises. No complaints have been received by the licensing service regarding this premises, although it should be noted that the premises is not currently licensed. Licensing Sub-Committee hearing – 28 May 2026 Part I - Public 6.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 6.1 Designated Premises Supervisor The proposed Designated Premises Supervisor is Sonal Mehta , who holds a Personal Licence issued by the London Borough of Brent. 6.2 A map of the area is attached at Appendix 2. 7.0 OFFICER'S OBSERVATIONS 7.1 The residents’ representations raise concerns over parking arrangements at the venue, and it is mentioned that the Council has consulted on amending the parking restrictions in the vicinity. Officers have sought an update from the Transport and Projects team. It is confirmed that a consultation on proposals to review the parking restrictions was undertaken between 17th October and 8th November 2025, with objections to these proposals being received. As a result of the objections, another consultation was conducted on amended proposals between 18th February and 11th March 2026. At the time of writing this report, no decision has been made on these proposals, and the results of the consultation are due to be considered in a report to the Cabinet Member. 7.2 Regardless of the outcome of the consultation, officers would advise that , where parking restrictions apply, any member of the public who decides on their own accord to park on yellow lines when they are in force commits an offence and the individual would be responsible for their own actions. The s182 Guidance also states that beyond the immediate area surrounding the premises, these are matters for the personal responsibility of individuals under the law and a ny individual who engages in anti - social behaviour , or in this case contravening parking restrictions, is accountable in their own right. 7.3 Some of the representations mention the possibility of a covenant applying to the land which may restrict the use of the land for commercial purposes. Officers must advise that this is not a matter which can be taken into consideration when determining a licensing application. It has not been confirmed that such a covenant does apply to the land or not, but even should such a covenant exist, restrictive covenants are private matters between t he landowner and the person who benefits from the covenant. 7.4 The representations contain comments regarding music and the mention of playing music in the application. Officers can confirm that the application is not requesting permission to offer the licensable activity of regulated entertainment , which would include the provision of live and recorded music. 7.5 The Sub-Committee will be aware that, following deregulation, no licence is required to play music in the following circumstances (as stated in the s182 Guidance); • Live music: no licence permission is required for: – a performance of unamplified live music between 08.00 and 23.00 on any day, on any premises. – a performance of amplified live music between 08.00 and 23.00 on any day on premises authorised to sell alcohol for consumption on those premises, provided that the audience does not exceed 500. – a performance of amplified live music between 08.00 and 23.00 on any day, in a workplace that does not have a licence, provided that the aud ience does not exceed 500. Licensing Sub-Committee hearing – 28 May 2026 Part I - Public • Recorded Music: no licence permission is required for: – any playing of recorded music between 08.00 and 23.00 on any day on premises authorised to sell alcohol for consumption on those premises, provided that the audience does not exceed 500. 7.6 There is also no licence required for the playing of live music or recorded music where such music is incidental to another activity which is not itself a description of entertainment falling within paragraph 2 of Schedule1 of the Licensing Act 2003. This music may also be referred to as background music. 7.7 Officers can confirm that the residents who raised concerns over music have been advised of the automatic rights of the premises with regards to the playing of music. The automa tic right to provide music can be removed or curtailed through a licence review should the operation of the venue undermine the licensing objectives, but it is not something which can removed or restricted upon the initial application for a premises licence. 7.8 The representations also raise concerns over the availability and sale of tobacco products. The Sub-Committee is reminded that this is an application for a Premises Licence under the Licensing Act 2003 regarding the sale of alcohol. There is currently no licence available for the sale of tobacco products, although the Tobacco and Vapes Act 2026, which has recently received Royal Assent, may introduce a separate licensing regime for tobacco and vaping products. 7.9 The representations also query if planning permission is required for the use of the premises. It is possible for a premises to apply for a licence without relevant planning permission being in place, and vice -versa, because there is no requirement for such applications to be submitted jointly. If a separate planning application is required, it may be submitted later. Businesses are required to ensure that they hold all appropriate licences and planning permissions before operating their business. The s182 Guidance also confirms that where a planning permission and a licence differ in their hours or conditions, any breach of a licence or planning permission may result in enforcement action as required. The Council’s Planning Service were consulted on this application as a statutory res ponsible authority, and no comments were received from Planning in response to this application. 7.10 Mediation has been attempted in this case as can be seen in some of the additional comments received from the residents. The applicant’s comments, which were circulated to the residents who submitted representations, are attached at Appendix 5. These have been included because, within these comments, a condition was proposed which would require that all alcohol consumed by p atrons outside of the premises within licensed external areas shall be consumed by patrons seated within the designated seating areas. Where responses have been received, this condition has not been accepted as satisfactor ily addressing the concerns raised in the representations. There have been no further developments with regards to mediation. 8.0 RELEVANT SECTIONS OF THE S182 GUIDANCE 8.1 Each application on its own merits At paragraph 1.17 it states that “Each application must be considered on its own merits and in accordance with the licensing authority’s statement of licensing policy; for example, if the application falls within the scope of a cumulative impact policy. Conditions attached to licences and certificates must be tailored to the individual type, location and characteristics of the premises and events concerned. This is essential to avoid the imposition of Licensing Sub-Committee hearing – 28 May 2026 Part I - Public disproportionate and overly burdensome conditions on premises where there is no need for such conditions. Standardised conditions should be avoided and indeed may be unlawful where they cannot be shown to be appropriate for the promotion of the licensing objectives in an individual case”. At paragraph 1.18 it states that “When making licensing decisions, all licensing authorities should consider the need to promote growth and deliver economic benefits”. At paragraph 1.19 it states that “In coming to a decision on individual licensing applications, licensing committees should h ave regard to relevant local plans and strategies – such as those relating to town planning, the night-time economy, or business support – provided these considerations are consistent with the licensing objectives and the authority’s published licensing policy. For example, licensing authorities in the area covered by the London Mayor should consider the London Plan 2021 which sets out a clear framework for the development of London over the next 20-25 years and the Mayor’s vision for Good Growth”. 8.2 Crime and disorder At paragraph 2.3 it states that “Conditions should be targeted on deterrence and preventing crime and disorder including the prevention of illegal working in licensed premises (see paragraph 10.10). For example, where there is good reason to suppose that disorder may take place, the presence of closed -circuit television (CCTV) cameras both inside and immediately outside the premises can actively deter disorder, nuisance, anti-social behaviour and crime generally. Some licence holders may wi sh to have cameras on their premises for the prevention of crime directed against the business itself, its staff, or its customers. But any condition may require a broader approach, and it may be appropriate to ensure that the precise location of cameras i s set out on plans to ensure that certain areas are properly covered and there is no subsequent dispute over the terms of the condition”. 8.3 Public nuisance At paragraph 2.20 it states that “The 2003 Act enables licensing authorities and responsible authorities, through representations, to consider what constitutes public nuisance and what is appropriate to prevent it in terms of conditions attached to specific premises licenc es and club premises certificates. It is therefore important that in considering the promotion of this licensing objective, licensing authorities and responsible authorities focus on the effect of the licensable activities at the specific premises on perso ns living and working (including those carrying on business) in the area around the premises which may be disproportionate and unreasonable. The issues will mainly concern noise nuisance, light pollution, noxious smells and litter”. At paragraph 2.21 it states that “Public nuisance is given a statutory meaning in many pieces of legislation. It is however not narrowly defined in the 2003 Act and retains its broad common law meaning. It may include in appropriate circumstances the reduction of the living and working amenity and environment of other persons living and working in the area of the licensed premises. Public nuisance may also arise as a result of the adverse effects of artificial light, dust, odour and insects or where its effect is prejudicial to health”. At paragraph 2.22 it states that “Conditions relating to noise nuisance will usually concern steps appropriate to control the levels of noise emanating from premises. This might be achieved by a simple measure such as ensuring that doors and wind ows are kept closed after a particular time, or persons are not permitted in garden areas of the premises after a certain time. More sophisticated measures like the installation of acoustic curtains or rubber Licensing Sub-Committee hearing – 28 May 2026 Part I - Public speaker mounts to mitigate sound escape from the premises may be appropriate. However, conditions in relation to live or recorded music may not be enforceable in circumstances where the entertainment activity itself is not licensable (see chapter 16). Any conditions appropriate to promote the prevention of public nuisance should be tailored to the type, nature and characteristics of the specific premises and its licensable activities. Licensing authorities should avoid inappropriate or disproportionate measures that could deter events that are valuable to the community, such as live music. Noise limiters, for example, are expensive to purchase and install and are likely to be a considerable burden for smaller venues”. At paragraph 2.23 it states that “As with all conditions, those relating to noise nuisance may not be appropriate in certain circumstances where provisions in other legislation adequately protect those living in the area of the premises. But as stated earlier in this Guidance, the approach of licensing authorities and responsible authorities should be one of prevention and when their powers are engaged, licensing authorities should be aware of the fact that other legislation may not adequately cover concerns raised in relevant representations and additional conditions may be appropriate”. At paragraph 2.24 it states that “Where applications have given rise to representations, any appropriate conditions should normally focus on the most sensitive periods. For example, the most sensitive period for people being disturbed by unreasonably loud music is at night and into the early morning when residents in adjacent properties may be attempting to go to sleep or are sleeping. This is why there is still a need for a licence for performances of live music between 11 pm and 8 am. In certain circumsta nces, conditions relating to noise emanating from the premises may also be appropriate to address any disturbance anticipated as customers enter and leave”. At paragraph 2.26 it states that “Beyond the immediate area surrounding the premises, these are matters for the personal responsibility of individuals under the law. An individual who engages in anti - social behaviour is accountable in their own right. However, it would be perfectly reasonable for a licensing authority to impose a condition, following relevant representations, that requires the licence holder or club to place signs at the exits from the building encouraging patrons to be quiet until they leave the area, or that, if they wish to smoke, to do so at designated places on the premises instead of outside, and to respect the rights of people living nearby to a peaceful night”. 8.4 Where representations are made At paragraph 9.3 it states that “Where a representation concerning the licensing objectives is made by a responsible authority about a proposed operating schedule and it is relevant (see paragraphs 9.4 to 9.10 below), the licensing authority’s discretion will be engaged. It will also be engaged if another person makes relevant representations to the licensing authority, which are also n ot frivolous or vexatious (see paragraphs 9.4 to 9.10 below). Relevant representations can be made in opposition to, or in support of, an application and can be made by any individual, body or business that has grounds to do so.” 8.5 Relevant, vexatious and frivolous representations At paragraph 9.4 it states that “A representation is “relevant” if it relates to the likely effect of the grant of the licence on the promotion of at least one of the licensing objectives. For example, a representation from a local businessperson about the commercial damage caused by competition from new licensed premises would not be relevant. On the other hand, a representation by a businessperson that nuisance caused by new premises would deter customers from entering the local area, and the steps proposed by the applicant to prevent Licensing Sub-Committee hearing – 28 May 2026 Part I - Public that nuisance were inadequate, would be relevant. In other words, representations should relate to the impact of licensable activities carried on from premises on the objectives. For representations in relation to variations to be relevant, they should be confined to the subject matter of the variation. There is no requirement for a responsible authority or other person to produce a recorded history of problems at premises to support their representations, and in fact this would not be possible for new premises”. At paragraph 9.9 it states that “It is recommended that, in borderline cases, the benefit of the doubt about any aspect of a representation should be given to the person making that representation. The subsequent hearing would then provide an opportunity for the person or body making the representation to amplify and clarify it”. 8.6 Determining actions that are appropriate for the promotion of the licensing objectives At paragraph 9.42 it states that " Licensing authorities are best placed t o determine what actions are appropriate for the promotion of the licensing objectives in their areas. All licensing determinations should be considered on a case -by-case basis. They should take into account any representations or objections that have been received from responsible authorities or other persons, and representations made by the applicant or premises user as the case may be". At paragraph 9.43 it states that " The authority’s determination should be evidence -based, justified as being appropriate for the promotion of the licensing objectives and proportionate to what it is intended to achieve”. At paragraph 9.44 it states that " Determination of whether an action or step is appropriate for the promotion of the licensing objectives requires an assessment of what action or step would be suitable to achieve that end. While this does not therefore require a licensing authority to decide that no lesser step will achieve the aim, the authority should aim to consider the potential burden that any condition would impose on the premises licence holder (such as the financial burden due to restrictions on licensable activities) as well as the potential benefit in terms of the promotion of the licensing objectives. However, it is imperative that the authority ensures that the factors which form the basis of its determination are limited to consideration of the promotion of the objectives and nothing outside those parameters. As with the consideration of licence variations, the licensing authority should cons ider wider issues such as other conditions already in place to mitigate potential negative impact on the promotion of the licensing objectives and the track record of the business. Further advice on determining what is appropriate when imposing conditions on a licence or certificate is provided in Chapter 10. The licensing authority is expected to come to its determination based on an assessment of the evidence on both the risks and benefits either for or against making the determination". 8.7 Proportionality At paragraph 10.2 it states that “Conditions include any limitations or restrictions attached to a licence or certificate and essentially are the steps or actions that the holder of the premises licence or the club premises certificate will be required to take or refrain from taking in relation to the carrying on of licensable activities at the premises in question. Failure to comply with any condition attached to a licence or certificate is a criminal offence, which on conviction is punishable by an unlimited fine or up to six months’ imprisonment. The courts have made clear that it is particularly important that conditions which are imprecise or difficult for a licence holder to observe should be avoided.” Licensing Sub-Committee hearing – 28 May 2026 Part I - Public At paragraph 10.8 it states that “The licen sing authority may not impose any conditions unless its discretion has been exercised following receipt of relevant representations and it is satisfied as a result of a hearing (unless all parties agree a hearing is not necessary) that it is appropriate to impose conditions to promote one or more of the four licensing objectives. In order to promote the crime prevention licensing objective conditions may be included that are aimed at preventing illegal working in licensed premises. This provision also appli es to minor variations”. At paragraph 10.9 it states that “It is possible that in some cases no additional conditions will be appropriate to promote the licensing objectives”. At paragraph 10.10 it states that "The 2003 Act requires that licensing conditions should be tailored to the size, type, location and characteristics and activities taking place at the premises concerned. Conditions should be determined on a case -by-case basis and standardised conditions wh ich ignore these individual aspects should be avoided. For example, conditions should not be used to implement a general policy in a given area such as the use of CCTV, polycarbonate drinking vessels or identity scanners where they would not be appropriate to the specific premises. Conditions that are considered appropriate for the prevention of illegal working in premises licensed to sell alcohol or late night refreshment might include requiring a premises licence holder to undertake right to work checks o n all staff employed at the licensed premises or requiring that evidence of a right to work check, either physical or digital (e.g. copy of any document checked or a clear copy of the online right to work check) is retained at the licensed premises. Licensing authorities may also wish to consider placing additional conditions on licences to safeguard patrons against spiking, if deemed appropriate and proportionate for a specific venue where there is evidence to justify such action (a definition of spiking can be found in para 2.7). Licensing authorities and other responsible authorities should be alive to the indirect costs that can arise because of conditions. These could be a deterrent to holding events that are valuable to the community or for the funding of good and important causes. Licensing authorities should therefore ensure that any conditions they impose are only those which are appropriate for the promotion of the licensing objectives". 8.8 Hours of Trading At paragraph 10.13 it states that "The Government acknowledges that different licensing strategies may be appropriate for the promotion of the licensing objectives in different areas. The 2003 Act gives the licensing authority power to make decisions about the hours during which premises can conduct licensable activities as part of the implementation of its licensing policy statement. Licensing authorities are best placed to make decisions about appropriate opening hours in their areas based on their local knowledge and in consultation with responsible authorities. However, licensing authorities must always consider each application and must not impose predetermined licensed opening hours, without giving individual consideration to the merits of each application”. At paragraph 10.15 it states that “Shops, stores and supermarkets should normally be free to provide sales of alcohol for consumption off the premises at any times when the retail outlet is open for shopping unless there are good reasons, based on the licensing objectives, for restricting those hours”. 8.9 Licensing Hours At paragraph 14.51 it states that “With regard to licensing hours, the Government acknowledges that different licensing approaches may be appropriate for the promotion of Licensing Sub-Committee hearing – 28 May 2026 Part I - Public the licensing objectives in different areas. The 2003 Act gives the licensing authority power to make decisions regarding licensed opening hours as part of the implementation of its licensing policy statement and licensing authorities are best placed to ma ke such decisions based on their local knowledge and in consultation with other responsible authorities. However, licensing authorities must always consider each application and must not impose predetermined licensed opening hours, without giving individua l consideration to the merits of each application”. At paragraph 14.52 it states that “Statements of licensing policy should set out the licensing authority’s approach regarding licensed opening hours and the strategy it considers appropriate for the promotion of the licensing objectives in its area. The statement of licensing policy should emphasise the consideration which will be given to the individual merits of an application. The Government recognises that licensed premises make an important contribution to our local communities, and has given councils a range of tools to effectively manage the different pressures that licensed premises can bring. In determining appropriate strategies around licensed opening hours, licensing authorities cannot seek to restrict the activities of licensed premises where it is not appropriate for the promotion of the licensing objectives to do so”. 8.10 Planning and Building Control At paragraph 14.66 it states that “There are circumstances when, as a condition of planning permission, a terminal hour has been set for the use of premises for commercial purposes. Where these hours are different to the licensing hours, the applicant must observe the earlier closing time. Premises operating in breach of their planning permission would be liable to prosecution under planning law. Proper integratio n should be assured by licensing committees, where appropriate, providing regular reports to the planning committee”. 9.0 RELEVANT SECTIONS OF HILLINGDON’S LICENSING POLICY 9.1 Licensing Objectives – The Prevention of Crime and Disorder At paragraph 12.1 it states that “Licensed premises, especially those offering late night/early morning entertainment, alcohol and refreshment, can be a source of crime and disorder. The Licensing Authority will expect operating schedules to satisfactorily address these issues from the design of the premises through to the daily operation of the business. Applicants are recommended to seek advice from the Police Licensing Officer and Licensing Authority Officers prior to making any application as early advice can allevi ate representations being made once an application is submitted. Full contact details for both are contained within the Responsible Authorities contact in Appendix F”. At paragraph 12.3 it states that “Where a number of premises may be in close proximity it may be difficult to attribute the disorder to patrons of particular premises, however there is a duty on Premises Licence Holders or Club Management Committees to act responsibly to ensure their own customers do not contribute to crime and disorder whil st in their premises and in the vicinity of their premises”. At paragraph 12.4 it states that “When addressing crime and disorder, the applicant should identify any particular issues that are likely to affect adversely the promotion of the crime and disorder objective. They should then include in the operating schedule how they will deal with those matters”. Licensing Sub-Committee hearing – 28 May 2026 Part I - Public At paragraph 12.5 it states that “Operating schedules should then show how they will address the issues identified. Further guidance on these measures is contained in Appendix B”. At paragraph 12.6 it states that “Applications referred to the Licensing Sub-Committee where relevant representations have been received will be determined on the individual merit of each case. The Licensing Sub-Committee has the power to impose specific conditions when considered appropriate in respect of the Crime and Disorder objective”. 9.2 Licensing Objectives – The Prevention of Public Nuisance At paragraph 14.1 it states that “Licensing Sub-Committees will be mindful that licensed premises, especially those operating late at night and in the early hours of the morning, can cause a range of nuisances impacting on people living, working or sleeping in the vicinity of the premises. When addressing public nuisance, the applicant should identify any particular issues that are likely to affect adversely the promotion of the licensing objective to prevent public nuisance. They should then include in the operating schedule how they will deal with those matters. The concerns mainly relate to noise nuisance from within the premises or from the use of any outside areas, light pollution, smoke and noxious smells. This may also include patrons outside a premises and the dispersal of customers. Due regard will be given to the impact these may have and the Licensing Authority will expect operating schedules to satisfactorily address these issues”. At paragraph 14.2 it states that “Appendix D provides a list of examples of relevant issues relating to public nuisance and considerations to be made to prevent such nuisance occurring”. At paragraph 14.3 it states that “Applicants should give particular consideration to measures to reduce the occurrence of public nuisance associated with accommodating smokers outside the premises following the introduction of smoke free areas in enclosed or substantially enclosed places”. At paragraph 14.4 it states that “In relation t o smoking outside licensed premises, it is expected that: • Suitable receptacles for customers will be provided and maintained to dispose of cigarette litter in areas used, or likely to be used, for smoking • Licensees will take all reasonable steps to discourage smoking on the public highway close to residential premises, particularly after 10pm. This could include measures such as a ban on customers taking drinks outside on to the public highway, the use of door supervisors, or imposing a time after which re-admissions to the premises will not be permitted • Garden areas are to be cleared at a reasonable time where not doing so could cause nuisance to neighbouring residents. • Appropriate signage is to be displayed prominently at the premises”. At paragraph 14.5 it states that “Where an application includes provision of a smoking shelter then the Licensing Authority strongly advises that the applicant includes measures in their operating schedule to fully address any potential disturbance to neighbouring resi dential premises. The shelter shall be fully compliant with Smoke Free legislation”. At paragraph 14.7 it states that “Applications referred to the Licensing Sub -Committee will be determined on the individual merit of each case. The Licensing Sub -Committee have the Licensing Sub-Committee hearing – 28 May 2026 Part I - Public power to impose specific conditions when considered necessary in respect of the Prevention of Public Nuisance objective”. 9.3 Representations At paragraph 19.2 it states that “Representations can be made to the Council, as Licensing Authority, by a ‘Responsible Authority’ or by ‘Interested Parties’, which include individuals such as residents or bodies such as a residents association, trade associations and other businesses operating. Representations can be made concerning:-  Applications for new premises licences or club premises certificates  Applications to vary premises licences or club premises certificates  Personal licence applications on criminal grounds (only by the Police)”. At paragraph 19.9 it states that “The 2003 Act 2003 also permits Elected Members to make representations on their own behalf as well as on behalf of their constituents. Members of the public who are making representations may also request that their Ward Councillor speaks on their behalf at public hearings to determine applications”. At paragraph 1 9.11 it states that “Written representations include letters and emails. Representations received after the end of the public consultation period cannot le gally be accepted and will not be considered by the Licensing Authority. At paragraph 19.12 it states that “Representations must contain: (a) The name, full address & post code, of the person making them; (b) The reasons for their representation; (c) Which of the four Licensing Objectives the representation relates to, i.e. crime and disorder; public nuisance; public safety; and/or protection of children from harm. Representations which do not meet this requirement may be rejected as being irrelevant or frivolous or vexatious”. At paragraph 19.13 it states that “For borderline cases, the Licensing Authority shall give the benefit of doubt to the person making the representation”. At paragraph 19.15 it states that “All valid representations will form part of a committee report that will become a public document. It will be given to the applicant, their agent, responsible authorities, other persons making representations and any other party requesting a copy as well as the Licensing Sub -Committee 10 working days prior to the hearing. Anonymous representations will not be accepted”. 9.4 Licence Conditions At paragraph 22.1 it states that “Conditions on premises licences and club certificates are determined by:  The measures put forward on the Operating Schedule  Mandatory conditions within the 2003 Act (current list included at Appendix G)  Measures decided at a hearing by the Licensing Sub-Committee”. At paragraph 22.2 it states that “Conditions attached to licences by the Licensing Authority that have b een proposed by the applicant in their operating schedule should be consistent with the steps set out in the operating schedule. This means that the effect of these conditions should be substantially the same as that intended by the terms of the operating schedule”. Licensing Sub-Committee hearing – 28 May 2026 Part I - Public At paragraph 22.3 it states that “Any conditions attached to licences following relevant representations will focus on matters within the control of the Premises Licence Holder or Club Management Committees. They will address matters which have a direct impact on those living, working or engaged in normal activities in the vicinity, as well as patrons of the licensed premises. They will not be used as a means of attempting to attach responsibility to Premises Licence Holders or Club Management C ommittees for matters outside their reasonable control, such as anti-social behaviour once away from the premises or licensable activity. Conditions imposed by the Licensing Authority shall be appropriate, reasonable, and proportionate and should be determined on a case-by-case basis”. At paragraph 22.4 it states that “The Licensing Authority will not impose standard conditions upon every licence issued; however, it may have regard to model conditions produced by the Government and/or the Institute of Licensing and it may choose to impose these in appropriate circumstances”. 9.5 Licensing Hours At paragraph 27.1 it states that “Prior to the introduction of the 2003 Act, it was believed that fixed and artificially early closing times (established under the Licensing Act 1964) were one of the key causes of rapid binge drinking prior to closing times and one of the causes of disorder and disturbance when large number of customers were required to leave the premises simultaneously”. At paragraph 27.2 it states that “The aim through promotion of the licensing objectives should be to reduce the potential for concentrations and achieve a slower dispersal of people from licensed premises through flexible opening times”. At paragraph 27.3 it states that “Arbitrary restrictions that would undermine the principle of flexibility will therefore be avoided. The four licensing objectives will be paramount at all times and the Council will always consider the individual merits of each case”. At paragraph 27.4 it states that “In accordance with guidance there is no fixed restriction on terminal hours for any particular areas of the borough. Such a restriction could cause the migration of patrons from one area to another and create the circumstance s that the legislation is attempting to avoid. Each application will be dealt with on its merits. It is for the applicants to detail in their Operating Schedule exactly what times they intend to open and close the premises and what measures they will take to ensure that they do not cause nuisance or disturbance to their neighbours in the vicinity. The later the terminal hour applied for, the greater will be the need to address the issues of disturbance and nuisance”. At paragraph 27.5 it states that “Shops, stores and supermarkets licensed to sell alcohol will normally be allowed to do so for the full duration of their trading hours. Restrictions may be applied, for example where representations are made indicating the particular premises or patrons of the premises are linked to disorder and or disturbance”. 10.0 LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS 10.1 When considering an application for a grant of a new Premises Licence, the Sub-Committee shall carry out its functions with a view to taking steps it considers appropriate for promoting the licensing objectives. The licensing objectives are:  Prevention of crime and disorder  Public Safety  Prevention of public nuisance Licensing Sub-Committee hearing – 28 May 2026 Part I - Public  Protection of children from harm 10.2 Members should note that each objective is of equal importance. There are no other licensing objectives, and the four objectives are paramount considerations at all times. 10.3 An application for a new premises licence may be made pursuant to s.16 and s.17 of the Act, and with regard to the Licensing Act 2003 (Premises licences and club premises certificates) Regulations 2005/42 and the licensing Act 2003 (Fees) Regulations 2005/79. 10.4 The Sub-Committee must ensure that all licensing decisions:  Have a direct relationship to the promotion of one or more of the four licensing objectives  Have regard to the Council's statement of licensing policy  Have regard to the Secretary of State guidance  Must not be subject to a blanket policy to the extent that it is applied so rigidly that an exercise of discretion in each individual case is precluded 10.5 Where relevant representations are made, the Licensing Authority must hold a hearing to determine the application, unless all are agreed that such a hearing is unnecessary s.18(3)(a) Licencing Act 2003. 10.6 Relevant representations are those that relate to the effect of the granting of the application on the promotion of the licensing objectives made by an interested party or responsible authority that have not been withdrawn and are not, in the opinion of the relevan t licencing authority, frivolous or vexatious s.18(7) Licensing Act 2003. 10.7 The Sub-Committee can only consider matters within the application that have been raised through representations from interested parties and responsible authorities. Interested parties must live within the vicinity of the premises. All applications will be decided on a case- by-case basis. 10.8 Following a hearing, the Sub -Committee must consider all relevant representations, and having taken into account the promotion of the l icensing objectives, under s.18(3(b) and (4) Licensing Act 2003, a decision can be taken: - i. To grant the licence, subject to the mandatory conditions and conditions consistent with the operating schedule; ii. To impose additional relevant conditions to such an extent as is considered necessary for the promotion of the licensing objectives; iii. To exclude any of the licensable activities to which the application relates; iv. To amend the times for all or some of the licensable activities; v. To refuse to specify a person in the licence as the premises supervisor; vi. To reject the application. 10.9 Conditions will not be necessary if they duplicate a current statutory requirement. The Licensing Authority may therefore only impose such conditions that are necessary to promote the licensing objectives arising out of the consideration of the representations. 10.10 If the Sub -Committee determines that it is necessary to modify the conditions, or to refuse the application for a Premises Licence application, it must give reasons for its decision. 10.11 The Council in its capacity as Licensing Authority has a duty to have regard to its public sector equality duty under s.149 of the Equality Act 2010. In summary s.149 provides that a Public Authority must, in the exercise of its functions, have due regard to the need to: Licensing Sub-Committee hearing – 28 May 2026 Part I - Public i. Eliminate discrimination harassment, victimisati on and any other conduct that is prohibited by or under this Act; ii. Advance equality of opportunity between persons who share a relevant protected characteristic and persons who do not share it; and iii. Foster good relations between persons who share relevant pr otected characteristics and persons who do not. 10.12 Section 149(7) of the Equality Act 2010 defines nine relevant protected characteristics these are: i. age ii. gender reassignment iii. being married or in a civil partnership iv. being pregnant or on maternity leave v. disability vi. race including colour, nationality, ethnic or national origin vii. religion or belief viii. sex ix. sexual orientation 10.13 Officers have provided the Sub -Committee with recommendations related to this application. Subject to the above -mentioned factors hav ing been properly considered, the Sub-Committee may depart from the recommendations if there are good reasons for doing so. The Sub -Committee is advised that such departures could give rise to an appeal or judicial review. 10.14 Interested parties, Respo nsible Authorities and the Applicant have the right to appeal the decision of the Licensing Sub-Committee to the Magistrates’ Court within a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the applicant was notified by the Licensing Authority of the decision to be appealed against.

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

📄 Appendix 2 - Map of the location , item 5. PDF 321 KB
Read the text of this document (1 page)
© Crown copyright and database rights 2023 Ordnance Survey AC0000810857 Appendix 2

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

📄 Appendix 4A - Addison representations_Redacted , item 5. PDF 337 KB
Read the text of this document (3 pages)
Representation Form from Interested Parties (Please read notes on reverse before completing) Your details (See notes 2 & 3); Your Name Michael Addison Your residential address Rickmansworth Road, Northwood HA6 2QN Your email address Your phone number The name of the body or organisation you represent N/A About the prem ises; Name of the premises you are making a representation about The Old Forge (The Smoking Jacket) Address of the premises you are making a representation about Rickmansworth Road, Northwood, HA6 2QN The Licensin g Objectives (See note 4); Licensing Objective Reasons for your representation and any supporting evidence Please tick; √ Prevention of Cr ime/Disorder √ Prevention of Public Nuisance  Protection of Children From Harm √ Public Safety My wife and I live in a property that is very close to the premises in question. We have some comments on the licensing application: 1. It is a mi scharacterisation to describe the surrounding area as low-density commercial and open spaces with a golf club and car showroom nearby with limited adjacent residential properties. It is a residential area with the only commercial properties being the golf club and the car showroom plus the premises in question which had previously been used by the car showroom. The adjacent residential properties are True Lovers’ Court (a purpose-built apartment building) and a pair of cottages known as Dyke cottages. The other side of Rickmansworth Road is wholly residential. 2. The application claims that 60% of the business will be cigar sales, 30% off-sales of alcohol and 10% for on-site consumption. How can they know? While our view is that there is no demand for this establishment locally, there is a risk that a much greater percentage of people will want to consume alcohol on the premises especially after 11pm on Fridays and Saturdays. We are not aware of any pubs locally that have licences after 11pm as routine. 3. It is stated that the primary retail function is the sale of cigars and the sale of alcohol is merely to complement this. The smoking of cigars will legally have to take place outside so there will inevitably be noise and smoke in the neighbourhood as a consequence. Appendix 4 4) In order to be considered 'relevant', the representation must relate to one or more of the 'Licensing Objectives'. These objectives are; a) Prevention of Crime/Disorder - This relates to any criminal activity, disorder or anti -social behaviour related to the application premises. b) Prevention of Public Nuisance - This relates to noise nuisance and vibration, litter, noxious smells, light pollution. c) Protection of Children from harm - This relates to the protection of children whilst on the application premises. d) Public Safety - This relates to the physical condition of the premises and the safety features provided for members of the public such as; fire safety, health & safety. 5) Upon submitting a representation, it is expected that you will attend the Licensing Sub- Committee hearing to deliver your representation verbally and answer any queries that the Committee may have. If you are unable to attend, your written representation will be considered. 6) You may wish to suggest an outcome to the Licensing Sub- Committee ie. grant the application with extra conditions; grant the application with fewer hours/activities; reject the application. Please note that the Licensing Sub-Committee will only make reasonable and proportionate decisions based upon the evidence they are presented with, and in line with the laws and regulations governing Licensing Hearings. 7) You may continue on separate sheets of paper if necessary and you may also attach any evidence which supports your representation. 8) Please submit all completed forms to: The Licensing Officer Regulatory Services London Borough of Hillingdon Civic Centre High Street Uxbridge, UB8 1UW licensing@hillingdon.gov.uk Tel - 01895 277433 www.hillingdon.gov.uk/licensing

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

📄 Appendix 4B - Farmery representations , item 5. PDF 1 MB
Read the text of this document (4 pages)
From: To: Austen Young Subject: RE: The Smoking Jacket, The Old Forge, Northwood. Date: 28 April 2026 20:07:43 Attachments: image001.png Austen, greetings, Thank you for the sight of this document. If I could address Sonil’s points: Nature of the Premises: I don’t know how she is able to quantify the on-site consumption. Her other three premises are in the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea and none have any outside space, so it is difficult to see how she can arrive at the 10% figure as on-site smoking and alcohol consumption is not something with which she has any experience. Noise and General Disturbance: In this residential area even 22 persons sitting, drinking and smoking will cause a nuisance and general disturbance. The additional control does not address these concerns. Smoke from Cigars: I don’t see how the outside areas can be away from neighbouring boundaries, when the whole of the Old Forge, except the area adjoining the road, has neighbour boundaries. I am also concerned that boundary fencing, taken together with the walls already in place will lead to an enclosed or substantially enclosed area (having a roof and walls that are more than 50% enclosed) Other Matters Raised: Parking and traffic are not part of the Licensing Act, but are matters which effect the public and, in many areas cause a nuisance. I appreciate her efforts in trying to assuage my concerns, and obviously those of other respondents, but I’m afraid they do not and I would seek to persuade the Licensing Authority that they reject the application. Best wishes. Richard Farmery. From: Austen Young <AYoung@hillingdon.gov.uk> Sent: 28 April 2026 11:16 To: Subject: RE: The Smoking Jacket, The Old Forge, Northwood. Dear Mr Farmery I confirm receipt of your objection to the new alcohol licence application in respect of the Old Forge, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood. Since you have expressed an interest in this application, I wanted to share the attached document with you. This has been supplied by the applicant in response to other objections which have been submitted against this application. These comments do include proposals regarding conditions on the use of the outside areas. You don't often get email from richard.farmerymbe@gmail.com. Learn why this is important I would be grateful if you could review the attached and let me know if these comments and proposals address your concerns or not. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any queries. Regards Austen Austen Young Licensing Officer Licensing Service Hillingdon Council Tel: 01895 277433 From: < > Sent: 27 April 2026 23:08 To: licensing <licensing@hillingdon.gov.uk> Subject: The Smoking Jacket, The Old Forge, Northwood. Dear Licensing, Please see attached my objections to the grant of a license for a drinking and smoking establishment at The Old Forge, Northwood. Many thanks. Richard Farmery. Hillingdon Council routinely monitors the content of emails sent and received via its network for the purposes of ensuring compliance with its policies and procedures. The contents of this message are for the attention and use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient or addressee, or the person responsible for sending the message you may not copy, forward, disclose or otherwise use it or any part of it in any way. To do so may be unlawful. If you receive this email by mistake please advise the sender immediately. Where opinions are expressed they are not necessarily those of the London Borough of Hillingdon. Service by email is not accepted unless by prior agreement.

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

📄 Appendix 4C - Kidson representations_Redacted , item 5. PDF 408 KB
Read the text of this document (7 pages)
From: Jane Kidson To: Austen Young Subject: Re: Representation against development of "The Smoking Jacket" Date: 22 April 2026 17:06:00 Attachments: image001.png image001.png Thanks for your feedback. Unfortunately this does not allay my concerns as follows: 1) Early morning and late night openings would generate intolerable noise for neighbouring residents, especially in summer months. 2) Relying on staff to manage noise is not acceptable and is not specific or measurable. It confirms that they are expecting noise and asking staff to manage this. 3) The fact that this bar will mainly sell whisky vs beer is irrelevant. Alcohol is alcohol and people become louder after consuming it. 4) Cigars are very strong and I expect smoke would waft into neighbouring properties housing children (including our tenants) which is not good for their health, nor setting a good example when the law is about to ban smoking for anyone born after 2008. Thank you for seeking further thoughts from me. Kind regards Jane Kidson On Tue, Apr 21, 2026, 17:49 Austen Young <AYoung@hillingdon.gov.uk> wrote: Dear Ms Kidson I confirm receipt of your objection to the new premises licence application in respect of the Old Forge, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood. I have received comments from the applicant in response to the objections which have been received, and I attach these for your information. I believe that you may be interested in these comments because these propose conditions on the use of the outside area. I would be grateful if you could review the attached and let me know if these steps address your concerns. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any queries. You don't often get email from Learn why this is important Regards Austen Austen Young Licensing Officer Licensing Service Hillingdon Council Tel: 01895 277433 From: Jane Kidson Sent: 21 April 2026 15:47 To: licensing <licensing@hillingdon.gov.uk> Cc: Jane Kidson Subject: Fwd: Representation against development of 'The Smoking Jacket' Representation Form from Interested Parties (Please read notes on reverse before completing) Your details (See notes 2 & 3); Your Name Jane Kidson Your residential address Waldens road,Horsell,Woking GU214RH Your email address Your phone number The name of the body or organisation you represent Tennant at 10 True lover court ...........................................................21/4/2026 Notes: 1. 2. 3. All representations must be submitted before the conclusion of the 28 day consultation period. This will be advertised 4. on the public notices and also on the Councils website. 5. 2. 3. 4. Persons who may make representation include; persons who reside near to the premises to which the application relates 5. and who are likely to be affected by licensable activities; residents associations who are representing residents who reside near to the application premises; Ward Councillors representing their constituents; any person who lives or works in the area and has 6. concerns about the application premises. 7. 3. 4. 5. Please note that representations cannot be anonymous. Copies of all representations will be published in any Committee 6. papers and will be sent to all persons involved with the hearing including the applicant. If you have concerns about the use of your information and would like to discuss this further, please contact one of our Licensing Officers for a discussion, on the contact 7. details below. 8. 4. 5. 6. In order to be considered 'relevant', the representation must relate to one or more of the 'Licensing Objectives'. 7. These objectives are; 8. a. b. c. Prevention of Crime/Disorder - This relates to any criminal activity, disorder or anti-social behaviour related to d. the application premises. e. f. g. h. Prevention of Public Nuisance - This relates to noise nuisance and vibration, litter, noxious smells, light pollution. i. j. k. l. Protection of Children from harm - This relates to the protection of children whilst on the application premises. m. n. o. p. Public Safety - This relates to the physical condition of the premises and the safety features provided for members q. of the public such as; fire safety, health & safety. r. 5. 6. 7. Upon submitting a representation, it is expected that you will attend the Licensing Sub-Committee hearing to deliver 8. your representation verbally and answer any queries that the Committee may have. If you are unable to attend, your written representation will be considered. 9. 6. 7. 8. You may wish to suggest an outcome to the Licensing Sub-Committee ie. grant the application with extra conditions; 9. grant the application with fewer hours/activities; reject the application. Please note that the Licensing Sub-Committee will only make reasonable and proportionate decisions based upon the evidence they are presented with, and in line with the laws and regulations 10. governing Licensing Hearings. 11. 7. 8. 9. You may continue on separate sheets of paper if necessary and you may also attach any evidence which supports your 10. representation. 11. 8. 9. 10. Please submit all completed forms to: 11. The Licensing Officer Regulatory Services London Borough of Hillingdon Civic Centre High Street Uxbridge, UB8 1UW licensing@hillingdon.gov.uk Tel - 01895 277433 www.hillingdon.gov.uk/licensing ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Jane Kidson Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026, 15:45 Subject: Representation against development of 'The Smoking Jacket' To: <licensing@hillingdon.gov.uk> Please find attached my objection to the above development Regards Jane Kidson Hillingdon Council routinely monitors the content of emails sent and received via its network for the purposes of ensuring compliance with its policies and procedures. The contents of this message are for the attention and use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient or addressee, or the person responsible for sending the message you may not copy, forward, disclose or otherwise use it or any part of it in any way. To do so may be unlawful. If you receive this email by mistake please advise the sender immediately. Where opinions are expressed they are not necessarily those of the London Borough of Hillingdon. Service by email is not accepted unless by prior agreement.

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

📄 Appendix 4F - Thakerar representations , item 5. PDF 262 KB
Read the text of this document (6 pages)
From: Rajeev Thakerar To: Austen Young Cc: meera mistry Subject: RE: Objection to Premises Licence Application – The Smoking Jacket, The Old Forge, Northwood (HA6 2QN) Date: 28 April 2026 14:46:33 Attachments: image001.png Dear Austen Thank you for providing the applicant’s response to the representations submitted. I have carefully reviewed their comments. While I acknowledge the clarifications provided, I must respectfully maintain my objection to this application. The applicant emphasises that the premises will operate as a low-capacity, retail-led environment rather than a bar. However, the concerns raised by residents are not based on an assumption of a high-volume drinking venue, but on the unsuitability of introducing any form of on-site alcohol consumption and smoking into this specific residential location. External Areas and Control Measures The applicant states that outdoor areas will be controlled, seated, and supervised. However, in practice, external areas are inherently more difficult to manage. Even small numbers of people seated outdoors will generate noise, conversation, and movement, particularly during evenings and weekends when background noise levels are low. The proposed pergola and garden seating areas introduce an ongoing external presence which extends the impact beyond that of a standard retail premises. This is a key concern that has not been adequately addressed. Noise and Disturbance While the applicant notes there will be no amplified music and a calm internal environment, this does not address the primary concern of noise generated externally. Voices and activity from outdoor seating areas will carry in a quiet residential setting and cannot be fully mitigated. Smoking, Odour, and Residential Amenity The applicant outlines mitigation measures such as screening and seating arrangements. However, cigar smoke and odour are not easily contained outdoors and are likely to drift towards neighbouring properties, particularly during warmer months. In a residential setting, this raises concerns regarding the impact on the normal use and enjoyment of private gardens, including by families with children, where there is a reasonable expectation of a low-impact environment. Exposure to smoke and odour during everyday outdoor use is not appropriate for this location. Parking, Traffic, and Public Safety The response suggests that parking and traffic are not licensing matters. However, in this location they are directly linked to public safety. Rickmansworth Road is a busy A road where parking is already extremely limited and frequently problematic. Vehicles already park partially on pavements at times, as well as blocking residential driveways, creating hazards for pedestrians and restricting access for residents. There are occasions where pavement obstruction is so severe that pushchairs and pedestrians are forced into the road to pass. On a busy A road, this presents a clear and immediate safety risk. This is particularly concerning given that there is a nursery, local schools, and an elderly residential home in close proximity, meaning the area is regularly used by both young children and more vulnerable elderly residents. Children regularly walk along this route to and from school, as well as at weekends for activities such as swimming and clubs. Increased traffic, parking pressure, and obstructed pavements present clear risks not only to children, but also to elderly residents who rely on safe and accessible pedestrian routes. Residential Context and Character The applicant describes the premises as a specialist retail environment. However, the inclusion of on-site alcohol consumption and dedicated external seating areas introduces elements more consistent with a hospitality use. This type of mixed retail and consumption use is typically more suited to a town centre or high street location, where infrastructure, parking, and surrounding uses are better aligned to accommodate customer activity. By contrast, this premises is located within a residential and Green Belt setting, where there is a clear expectation of a low-impact environment. The presence of vacant units within nearby high street locations further highlights that more appropriate sites exist for this type of business. Even a low-capacity venue can have a disproportionate impact in such a residential context, and this fundamental issue of location has not been addressed. Existing Property Restrictions in the Local Area Our property deeds include a restriction prohibiting the sale of alcohol from the premises, and we understand that neighbouring properties may be subject to similar covenants. While this is a separate legal matter from licensing, it reflects the longstanding residential character of the area and reinforces concerns about the suitability of introducing a licensed premises in this location. Cumulative Impact While each element is described as controlled, in practice it is not possible to fully control external activity, including customer behaviour, noise, and use of outdoor areas. When considered together—external seating, smoking, alcohol consumption, increased visitor activity, and parking pressures, the cumulative impact is significant for a quiet residential area. In summary, the applicant’s response focuses on how the premises will be managed but does not address whether this type of use is appropriate in this location. The concerns raised by residents remain valid and unresolved. For these reasons, I respectfully request that this application be refused. Thank you for your consideration. Yours faithfully, Mr & Mrs Thakerar Rickmansworth Road Northwood HA6 2QN From: Austen Young <AYoung@hillingdon.gov.uk> Sent: 27 April 2026 14:47 To: Rajeev Thakerar Subject: RE: Objection to Premises Licence Application – The Smoking Jacket, The Old Forge, Northwood (HA6 2QN) Dear Mr & Mrs Thakerar I confirm receipt of your objection to the new premises licence application in respect of the Old Forge, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood. Since you have expressed an interest in this application, please find attached comments which I have received from the applicant in response to other concerns raised by residents. I wanted to share these with you because these comments provide information on the operation of the premises and propose conditions on the use of the external areas, which you have raised as being concerns in your email. If these comments and these proposals do address your concerns, I would be grateful if you could let me know. If these comments do not address your concerns and you still wish your objection to stand, I would be grateful if you could confirm this to me as well. You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any queries. Regards Austen Austen Young Licensing Officer Licensing Service Hillingdon Council Tel: 01895 277433 From: Rajeev Thakerar Sent: 27 April 2026 13:12 To: licensing <licensing@hillingdon.gov.uk> Cc: meera mistry Subject: Objection to Premises Licence Application – The Smoking Jacket, The Old Forge, Northwood (HA6 2QN) Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing to formally object to the premises licence application submitted for “The Smoking Jacket” at The Old Forge, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood (HA6 2QN), in relation to the sale of alcohol. I am a local resident living a short distance from the premises, with a young family. The site is located within a quiet residential area surrounded by houses and flats, and is not situated within a town centre or high street setting. I have serious concerns regarding the suitability of granting a licence at this location. I note the application describes a low-capacity, seated cigar retail environment with ancillary alcohol sales and the use of both internal and external seating areas. However, even at a smaller scale, this represents a material change in use that is not in keeping with the surrounding residential setting. My objection is based on the following licensing objectives: Prevention of Public Nuisance The inclusion of outdoor seating areas (including a pergola and rear garden) is likely to generate noise from customers, particularly during evenings and weekends. In a quiet residential area, even low-level conversation and activity can carry and disturb nearby homes. The use of these areas for cigar smoking may also result in odour and smoke drift, which could affect the enjoyment of neighbouring homes and gardens, particularly during warmer months. Public Safety The premises is located on Rickmansworth Road, a busy A road where parking is already extremely limited and frequently congested. This regularly creates difficult and potentially dangerous conditions for drivers and pedestrians. Hillingdon Council is currently introducing double yellow lines to improve traffic flow and safety. The addition of a destination premises is likely to increase vehicle movements and parking demand, potentially undermining these improvements. There are also several elderly residents in the immediate area, and increased traffic and activity may pose additional risks to more vulnerable members of the community. Protection of Children from Harm The premises is located close to local schools and within a family residential area. Unlike a high street environment, children are more likely to be present in the immediate vicinity of their homes. The introduction of alcohol consumption and smoking in this setting increases the likelihood of direct exposure during everyday activities such as walking, playing, and travelling to and from school. Prevention of Crime and Disorder There has already been an increase in local issues, including fly-tipping, alcohol-related litter, and suspected drug activity. The introduction of a premises selling alcohol, even as an ancillary use, risks exacerbating these problems. Suitability of Location This is not a commercial or town centre location but a residential and Green Belt setting. The inclusion of on-site alcohol consumption and external seating introduces elements more typical of a hospitality venue and is not in keeping with the character of the area. Our property deeds include a restriction prohibiting the sale of alcohol from the premises, and I understand similar covenants may apply locally. While separate to licensing, this reflects the intended residential nature of the area. Given the above concerns, I respectfully request that this application be refused. I would appreciate confirmation that this representation has been received and considered. Yours faithfully, Mr & Mrs Thakerar Rickmansworth Road Northwood HA6 2QN Hillingdon Council routinely monitors the content of emails sent and received via its network for the purposes of ensuring compliance with its policies and procedures. The contents of this message are for the attention and use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient or addressee, or the person responsible for sending the message you may not copy, forward, disclose or otherwise use it or any part of it in any way. To do so may be unlawful. If you receive this email by mistake please advise the sender immediately. Where opinions are expressed they are not necessarily those of the London Borough of Hillingdon. Service by email is not accepted unless by prior agreement.

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

Page Updated: