Home Decisions Meetings News
← Back to Health & Social Care SC

Health & Social Care SC

Wednesday 9th October 2024 • View on LB Hillingdon’s website
Meeting documents
👥 Attendance details📄 Agenda frontsheet PDF 489 KB📦 Public reports pack PDF 2 MB📦 Agenda reports pack - Agenda B PDF 3 MB📝 Printed minutes PDF 448 KB
Read the text of: Agenda frontsheet PDF 489 KB (4 pages)
Lloyd White Head of Democratic Services London Borough of Hillingdon, Phase II, Civic Centre, High Street, Uxbridge, UB8 1UW www.hillingdon.gov.uk Health and Social Care Select Committee Councillors on the Committee Councillor Nick Denys (Chair) Councillor Reeta Chamdal (Vice-Chair) Councillor Tony Burles Councillor Philip Corthorne Councillor Kelly Martin Councillor June Nelson Councillor Sital Punja (Opposition Lead) Date: WEDNESDAY, 9 OCTOBER 2024 Time: 6.30 PM Venue: COMMITTEE ROOM 5 - CIVIC CENTRE Meeting Details: The public and press are welcome to attend and observe the meeting. For safety and accessibility, security measures will be conducted, including searches of individuals and their belongings. Attendees must also provide satisfactory proof of identity upon arrival. Refusal to comply with these requirements will result in non- admittance. This meeting may be broadcast on the Council’s YouTube channel. You can also view this agenda online at www.hillingdon.gov.uk Published: Tuesday, 1 October 2024 Contact: Nikki O'Halloran Email: nohalloran@hillingdon.gov.uk Useful information for residents and visitors Travel and parking Bus routes 427, U1, U3, U4 and U7 all stop at the Civic Centre. Uxbridge underground station, with the Piccadilly and Metropolitan lines, is a short walk away. Limited parking is available at the Civic Centre. For details on availability and how to book a parking space, please contact Democratic Services. Please enter from the Council’s main reception where you will be directed to the Committee Room. Accessibility An Induction Loop System is available for use in the various meeting rooms. Please contact us for further information. Attending, reporting and filming of meetings For the public part of this meeting, residents and the media are welcomed to attend, and if they wish, report on it, broadcast, record or film proceedings as long as it does not disrupt proceedings. It is recommended to give advance notice to ensure any particular requirements can be met. The Council will provide a seating area for residents/public, an area for the media and high speed WiFi access to all attending. The officer shown on the front of this agenda should be contacted for further information and will be available at the meeting to assist if required. Kindly ensure all mobile or similar devices on silent mode. Please note that the Council may also record or film this meeting and publish this online. Emergency procedures If there is a FIRE, you will hear a continuous alarm. Please follow the signs to the nearest FIRE EXIT and assemble on the Civic Centre forecourt. Lifts must not be used unless instructed by a Fire Marshal or Security Officer. In the event of a SECURITY INCIDENT, follow instructions issued via the tannoy, a Fire Marshal or a Security Officer. Those unable to evacuate using the stairs, should make their way to the signed refuge locations. Terms of Reference Health & Social Care Select Committee To undertake the overview and scr utiny role in relation to the following Cabinet Member portfolio(s) and service areas: Cabinet Member Portfolios  Cabinet Member for Health & Social Care Relevant service areas 1. Adult Social Work 2. Adult Safeguarding 3. Provider & Commissioned Care 4. Public Health 5. Health integration / Voluntary Sector Statutory Healthy Scrutiny This Committee will also undertake the powers of health scrutiny conferred by the Local Authority (Public Health, Health and Wellbeing Boards and Health Scrutiny) Regulations 2013. It will:  Work closely with the Health & Wellbeing Board & Local Health watch in respect of reviewing and scrutinising local health priorities and inequalities.  Respond to any relevant NHS consultations. Duty of partners to attend and provide information The Local Authority (Public Health, Health and Wellbeing Boards and Health Scrutiny) Regulations 2013, imposes duties on ‘responsible persons’ to provide a local authority with such information about the planning, provision and operation of health services in the area of the authority as it may reasonably require to discharge its health scrutiny functions through the Health & Social Care Select Committee. All relevant NHS bodies and health service providers (including GP practices and other primary care providers and any private, independent or third sector providers delivering services under arrangements made by clinical commissioning groups, NHS England or the local authority) have a duty to provide such information. Additionally, Members and employees of a relevant NHS body or relevant health service provider have a duty to attend before a local authority when required by it (provided reasonable notice has been given) to answer questions the local authority believes are necessary to carry out its health scrutiny functions. Further guidance is available from the Department of Health on information requests and attendance of individuals at meetings considering health scrutiny. Cross-cutting topics This Committee will also act as lead select committee on the monitoring and review of the following cross-cutting topics: • Domestic Abuse services and support Agenda CHAIR'S ANNOUNCEMENTS 1 Apologies for absence - 2 Declarations of Interest in matters coming before this meeting - 3 Minutes of the meeting held on 11 September 2024 1 - 10 4 Exclusion of press and public - 5 Health Updates 11 - 22 6 Cabinet Forward Plan Monthly Monitoring 23 - 32 7 Work Programme 33 - 36

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

Read the text of: Printed minutes PDF 448 KB (11 pages)
Minutes HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE SELECT COMMITTEE 9 October 2024 Meeting held at Committee Room 5 - Civic Centre Committee Members Present: Councillors Nick Denys (Chair), Reeta Chamdal (Vice-Chair), Tony Burles, Philip Corthorne, Scott Farley (In place of Sital Punja), Kelly Martin and June Nelson Also Present: Clinton Beale, Stakeholder Engagement Manager (North West), London Ambulance Service NHS Trust Claire Eves, Associate Director of Outer London Services, Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust Dr Ritu Prasad, Chair, Hillingdon GP Confederation Chris Reed, Hillingdon Group Manager, London Ambulance Service NHS Trust Derval Russell, Harefield Hospital Site Director, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals - Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Jason Seez, Deputy Chief Executive, Director of Strategy and Senior Responsible Officer, Hospital Redevelopment Programme, The Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Keith Spencer, Managing Director, Hillingdon Health and Care Partners (HHCP) Lisa Taylor, Managing Director, Healthwatch Hillingdon LBH Officers Present: Nikki O'Halloran (Democratic, Civic and Ceremonial Manager) 29. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE (Agenda Item 1) Apologies for absence had been received from Councillor Sital Punja (Councillor Scott Farley was present as her substitute). 30. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST IN MATTERS COMING BEFORE THIS MEETING (Agenda Item 2) Councillor Kelly Martin declared a non-pecuniary interest in Agenda Item 5 – Health Updates as he worked part time at Harefield Hospital, and remained in the room during the consideration thereof. 31. MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON 11 SEPTEMBER 2024 (Agenda Item 3) It was noted that, whilst the minutes were a verbatim record of the meeting and gave a gist of the discussion that took place, a sentence had been missed off at the end of the third paragraph of Minute Number 25 in the hard copy version of the agenda (the online versions of the minutes and agenda were correct). The missing sentence read: “Mr Curry advised that he had spoken to Heathrow Airport about buying the hospice but that Heathrow had declined.” RESOLVED: That the amended minutes of the meeting held on 11 September 2024 be agreed as a correct record. 32. EXCLUSION OF PRESS AND PUBLIC (Agenda Item 4) RESOLVED: That all items of business be considered in public. 33. HEALTH UPDATES (Agenda Item 5) The Chair welcomed those present to the meeting. As Members of the Committee needed time to be able to read and digest the information to be able to fulfil their statutory health scrutiny responsibilities, health partners were reminded of the requirement to provide written reports by the deadline provided (this was usually at least six clear working days before the meeting). The receipt of information any later than this materially hindered the Committee in its ability to fulfil this role. The Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (THH) Mr Jason Seez, Deputy Chief Executive at THH, advised that the Trust had achieved 78.4% against its 4 hour A&E target in 2023/24 (compared to 76% in the previous year). However, it was recognised that there was still room for improvement and that there would be a focus on Type 1 performance (the more serious presentations). As at July 2024, the Trust had achieved 71.83% all-type performance against the national target of 76%. Although THH was currently below target, there were a number of improvement initiatives in place to support this. Mr Chris Reed, Hillingdon Group Manager at The London Ambulance Service NHS Trust (LAS), advised that the LAS had seen a 13% increase in the number of Category 1 calls with higher acuity so resolving this issue would need a joined up approach. Dr Ritu Prasad, Chair of Hillingdon GP Confederation, advised that Hillingdon had an ageing population with multi morbidities and that GPs were seeing an increase in the number of acute presentations. Mr Keith Spencer, Managing Director at Hillingdon Health and Care Partners, advised that Brunel University had been commissioned to undertake an investigation into why patients were going to A&E (e.g., were they more ill than previously?). Once this work had been completed, Mr Spencer would forward the results to the Democratic, Civic and Ceremonial Manager to share with Members of the Committee. Concern was expressed that there had been an increase in the number of patients presenting at A&E that were then admitted to hospital. It was queried whether residents were turning up at A&E as a last resort as they had no other options. Mr Spencer advised that this had been the topic of regular discussions. There may have been alternative pathways that these patients could have used but the data suggested that the majority of patients attending ED at weekends and after 5pm during the week were lower acuity which would suggest that it was because they were unable to get a convenient GP appointment. Although the winter pressure beds would usually help to accommodate demand during the increased winter activity, these tended to be open all year round. As such, a whole system approach was needed to address the demand. The hospital redevelopment plan would help to bring partners together to keep patients out of hospital through a place-based transformation strategy. During 2023/24, £34.6m had been invested into the capital programme, largely in relation to buildings related to the redevelopment project. There had been more than 4k babies born at Hillingdon Hospital and the Trust had delivered the elective activity target. Whilst the planned care performance had been good, there was still work to do in relation to the cancer diagnostics and standards with 80.8% of cancer patients waiting less than two weeks for an urgent referral from the date that they were first seen. Mr Seez advised that the Care Quality Commission (CQC) had inspected Hillingdon Hospital in July 2024 and Mount Vernon Hospital in August 2024 and had undertaken a well-led review of the Trust in September 2024. The well-led review would result in an updated overall rating – the current Trust rating had not been reviewed since about 2018. Staff had worked really hard to provide the information that had been required by the CQC. Members queried whether the concerns raised by the CQC during their recent inspections of THH had materially affected the improvement work. Mr Seez advised that the CQC had recently changed the way that it conducted its well-led reviews and that THH staff had implemented a lot of improvement works since the rating was last reviewed in 2018. The concerns raised had been in relation to issues such as patients in A&E having observations, the effect of the poor estate on patients and infection prevention and control. Work had continued in relation to the decant and enabling works for the hospital redevelopment. Wards had been moved into the new Modular North and Modular South blocks so there had been no reduction in the number of beds. The next steps would include finalising the plans for the Furze building to provide adult audiology, haematology, the education and training library and clinical admission services. A temporary carpark would be created and work continued on the separate power supply for the new hospital. It had been noted in the media that the Government would be reviewing some of the proposed new hospitals, including Hillingdon Hospital which had been a little unsettling. Mr Seez advised that Mr Wes Streeting MP, had commented in June 2023 on how poor the Hillingdon estate was and had pledged that, if they won the election, a new Hillingdon Hospital would be built in the first term of a new Labour Government. Hospital staff were commended for their work. Mr Seez advised that a People Strategy had been put in place to provide support to THH staff to do their jobs. The annual Staff Survey had also showed significant improvements across the board. Effort needed to continue to ensure that as many substantive staff were in place as possible at all times. Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (CNWL) Ms Claire Eves, Associate Director of Outer London Services at CNWL, advised that the Trust had been focussing on initiatives that would prevent hospital admissions by providing more support at home. CNWL’s work to align its nursing teams with the neighbourhood teams had been progressing. The Trust would be celebrating community services in November by showcasing its work in the community. Dates and venues for these events would be shared in due course. Ms Eves advised that the Trust had been working closely with the local authority to coordinate children’ services with the Family Hub and Stronger Families transformation. A new collaboration agreement had been put in place with the Council which would ensure more integrated working to maximise resources and align priorities for children in the Borough. NHS England had undertaken a review of childhood immunisations across London. As a result, the childhood immunisation service in Hillingdon had transferred from CNWL to Vaccination UK from 1 September 2024. The Trust had been working with this new provider to ensure the service was transferred safely with minimal impact on staff, children, families and schools. Work continued in relation to support for adult mental health to accommodate system flow and pressures experienced on the crisis pathway. Schemes included Hillingdon Lighthouse which was a purpose built facility situated at the front end of A&E at Hillingdon Hospital. A meeting would be taking place the following week to establish whether or not funding would be available to continue the service into the next year. Mr Spencer advised that the number of people with mental ill health in Hillingdon had been growing. Around 4-9 people were presenting at Hillingdon ED in crisis each day which meant that mental health was becoming an increasing priority. Although this was not a reflection of the quality of the services provided, consideration needed to be given to rethinking the offer that was available. Hillingdon’s Crisis House (The Retreat) had seen an increase in occupancy levels since moving to a 24/7 model in January 2024. Although funding had been secured to deliver the service for the next year, work was underway with North West London Integrated Care Board (NWL ICB) to evaluate CNWL’s crisis alternatives and inform future funding decisions. The Cove Café provided a safe space for individuals to reduce their levels of distress. Feedback provided in relation to the service had been very positive but Members queried whether services were reaching as many people as they could. Ms Eves advised that this data had been captured and she would share it with the Democratic, Civic and Ceremonial Manager for circulation to the Committee. The criteria for accessing services had been widened and work had been undertaken to look at community hubs supporting people in the community before they reached crisis. It was noted that there were a lot of non-residents presenting at Hillingdon A&E (e.g., from Bournemouth) and investigations were underway as to why they were coming to Hillingdon. It was agreed that much more detailed information on these issues be brought to the Committee’s next meeting. CNWL had been awarded the contract for the new Addictions, Recovery, Community, Hillingdon (ARCH) service in the summer. Since then, the focus had been on the mobilisation of the service. Members queried what was “new” about the service. Dr Ritu Prasad, Chair of Hillingdon GP Confederation, advised that ARCH had been undertaking physical health assessments and had also moved to a seven-day model. Ms Eves would send details to the Democratic, Civic and Ceremonial Manager for circulation to the Committee. A key focus of the CAMHS transformation had been to ensure that children were seen at the right time, in the right place, by the right person, using a needs-led approach. To this end, work had been undertaken to develop the early intervention offer and expand the core offer to increase the number of children accessing CAMHS and significantly reduce waiting times. Whilst early intervention and the KOOTH service had been seen in a positive light, Members queried whether there had been any validation of service user numbers or the impact that it had had on service users. They questioned whether outcomes had been improved for service users and whether the provision of this service had prevented the use of other services through de-escalation. Ms Eves confirmed that the services were having an impact as part of a wider package of services rather than in isolation. She would provide Members with further information. CNWL had been working closely with the local authority lead on obesity, getting children school ready and the delivery of early help. It was understood that the earlier interventions were put in place, the better the outcomes. It was noted that an evaluation report in relation to the wellbeing bus pilot in Heathrow Villages had been circulated to Members earlier in the day. Although trying a new approach was commended, it was suggested that the design of the pilot had had significant issues which meant that it was never going to be successful (things such as the bus not being fitted out for medical use, lack of parking, etc). Members queried what would happen next. Mr Spencer advised that he had discussed the wellbeing bus evaluation report with residents in the Heathrow Villages. It had been agreed that a fixed location for the delivery of health services would be preferable and, to this end, he had met with Heathrow Airport and identified 45 Holloway Lane as a possible location. Mr Spencer and Councillor Jane Palmer, the Council’s Cabinet Member for Health and Social Care, would be meeting with residents in Heathrow Villages on Thursday 10 October 2024. As Members had only just received the wellbeing bus evaluation report, it was agreed that this issue be tabled for consideration at the Committee’s next meeting on 12 November 2024. Concern was expressed that the NHS had withdrawn speech and language therapy services from a school in Ruislip in May 2024. Ms Eves advised that CNWL had been working with the local authority and North West London Integrated Care Board (NWL ICB) to establish a way forward with regard to funding for the service. She would provide Members with an update at a future meeting. Members asked that future reports provide clear and detailed information about those accessing the services provided by CNWL, the objectives of the services and the outcomes for service users. Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust Mrs Derval Russell, Harefield Hospital Site Director, advised that the volume of elective activity over the last three months had been adversely affected by a cyber-attack that had taken place on 3 June 2024. Following the attack, cross matching blood for patients having surgery had had to be undertaken manually for a number of weeks which had been very time consuming. There had since been a period of recovery. A full review of the incident would be undertaken and learning would be shared. The Trust continued to use the Ortis platform to monitor patients who were waiting for surgery. The system detected any clinical deterioration of patients that indicated a further consultant review. Work continued to try to integrate Ortis with the EPIC patient management system. The introduction of the EPIC system last year had provided patients and staff with challenges. Staff satisfaction with the system varied depending on which group you talked to. For example, whilst staff on the wards were happy with the more detailed level of information that they could access but consultants were not necessarily happy about the amount of time it took them to input that detail. Concerns from staff were being address in one-to-one sessions as well as in group sessions and information about various shortcuts was being disseminated. There had been some data quality issues but this was to be expected with the introduction of a new system and was expected to reduce over time. The system’s reporting facility was expected to prove incredibly useful and had been used at a Multi-Agency Discharge Event in March 2024. It was noted that there had been some downtime since the introduction of EPIC. A business continuity plan had been in place for such eventualities but this had still proved challenging when the system had gone down for the first time. It had subsequently gotten easier and contingencies had been put in place such as a number of machines around the hospital that could be used that would not be affected by downtime. With regard to diagnostics, Members were advised that 95% of patients should receive their diagnostic test results within six weeks of referral. Whilst a lot of work had been undertaken to reduce waiting times for diagnostics in modalities such as imaging, meeting the standard for Echo and sleep studies had been a bigger challenge. A restructure had been undertaken with regard to Echo which was expected to have a positive impact. Sleep studies had been more of a struggle with the volume of patients and issues such as equipment not being returned. Mrs Russell advised that cancer services had been performing well. However, in the last week, there had been 32 lung cancer patient referrals. These referrals had been made through the usual referral routes so it would need to be monitored to ensure that it was just a blip. In April 2024, the Committee had been advised that there were some concerns around the number of critical care vacancies at that time. A critical care nursing recruitment drive had been undertaken and had resulted in the appointment of 29 WTE staff. It would be important to ensure that this level of substantive critical care staff was maintained. Mrs Russell noted that the success of this campaign had been largely resultant from the critical care team taking responsibility for the recruitment process (with support from HR) and having representation from various teams across the whole hospital at the recruitment day. The expansion of ULEZ into outer London boroughs had prompted a lot of discussions in August 2023. There had been some staff that had had to change their vehicles to achieve compliance but there had not been any real concerns raised recently. Although some staff had been using the back entrance to the car park, this had had to be closed as the open access had resulted in the theft of a generator and cabling. With regard to the estate, Members were advised that Oak Ward and Acorn Ward continued to be the areas of the hospital in the worst condition and that there was unlikely to be any funding available in the near future to rebuild. Mrs Russell advised that the Trust was instead looking to sweat its assets in terms of things like using its available space for six days each week instead of five. Work was also underway on a new clinical strategy which would take effect from 2030 and would look at what was needed to deliver services over the subsequent 20+ years. The London Ambulance Service NHS Trust (LAS) Mr Chris Reed, Hillingdon Group Manager at LAS, advised that Hillingdon had taken ownership and accountability for actions that had previously been centralised by the Trust including localised scheduling, tethered equipment and localised fleet allocation. The welfare of staff continued to be a huge priority for the Trust. To this end, action had been taken to ensure that all staff felt safe in the workplace including the introduction of the Trust’s Sexual Safety Charter and the use of body worn cameras and CCTV in ambulances (which had helped with convictions). All staff in Hillingdon had been given training on how to report inappropriate conduct and how to access support. It was hoped that this direct action to support staff experiencing sexual and other harassment would be reflected in the staff survey. It was agreed that Members would get an update on the results of the survey at the next health updates meeting on 23 January 2025. A wellbeing hub had been created for staff and continued to grow which included referrals for financial advice and a huge range of support was available for other matters such as menopause, etc. It was noted that most of the sickness absence in Hillingdon had been in relation to stress (sickness levels in the Borough were currently at around 7.2% for the previous 12 months). LAS staff had recently been given a pay award which had had a positive impact on morale. It was important that the LAS workforce represented the people that it served. To this end, a Trust wide focus group had been set up to do what it could to ensure LGBTQ+ representation amongst the workforce. Mr Reed would bring further information on this to a subsequent meeting. LAS staff worked a rotating 12-hour shift pattern with no more than four consecutive days and no more than three consecutive nights. It was unlikely that there would ever be a rota that pleased all staff. The Trust continued to champion the use of alternative care pathways to reduce unnecessary conveyances to Hillingdon A&E and ensure that patients were getting the most appropriate care for their needs. To support this, training sessions had been planned for LAS frontline staff with the Urgent Care Centre team in order to increase referrals. Members were advised that only 52.1% of calls were conveyed to the ED. Newly qualified clinicians were able to identify alternative care pathways (ACPs) on their tablets to ensure that they were not missing any red flag conditions / symptoms or contact the clinical hub to gain advice from more experiences colleagues if they were thinking of using an ACP. Although the LAS was striving to identify the right pathways for patients, there was no magic figure for how many should / should not be conveyed to hospital as it depended on the individuals. A regular audit was undertaken and THH staff provided feedback to LAS staff about possible alternative pathways. When conveying patients to A&E, LAS staff should be waiting no more than 45 minutes to hand over before they left. Although it was the right thing to do (as the risk to patients waiting for an ambulance was greater than those waiting in hospital), LAS staff knew that this posed some challenges for hospital staff. Mr Reed received a daily report on the breaches of this 45 minute standard. Mr Reed advised that television cameras had been following LAS crews around for a BBC documentary (“Ambulance”) and that the resultant programme would be aired in October 2024. The programme highlighted the challenges faced by crews on a daily basis and the need to use the service appropriately. Members were advised that there had been a slight increase of 7 seconds in Category 1 response times following a 13% increase in the number of calls for people in life threatening circumstances (the response time was now at 7 minutes 16 seconds). The average length of time on scene had decreased by half a minute to 36.4 minutes in the last six months (compared to the Trust average of 38.0 minutes). “Right Care, Right Person (RCRP)” had been introduced in London just over a year ago. Mr Reed advised that the initiative had not adversely affected the Trust’s time and that, when the LAS crews requested a presence, the police attended. He noted that a police presence when someone was in mental health crisis would sometimes exacerbate the issue. Mr Reed regularly met with Chief Superintendent Wilson so would be able to raise any concerns if they arose. The LAS had always had to navigate through roadworks in the Borough. The Trust was provided with details about roadworks but sometimes there was just too much information. Mr Reed had a good relationship with Council officers and was in regular contact. However, crews would sometimes end up out of the Borough and wouldn’t necessarily have information about roadworks there. There was an internal system for reporting any concerns. Hillingdon Health and Care Partners (HHCP) Mr Keith Spencer, Managing Director at HHCP, advised that there had been 8% more GP appointments available this year than there had been last year. Concern was expressed that the PATCHs patient access system was still not working as well as it could as there were some patients who were unable to use the system and get a GP appointment (even though there had been an increase in the number of appointment available). Dr Ritu Prasad, Chair of the Hillingdon GP Confederation, noted that there had been an increase in the use of digital technology and that receptionists were able to complete the online request form for those who were unable to use the technology. These patients were being identified and prioritised but it was initially largely trial and error. As every practice was different, it had proved difficult to standardise this support. A PATCHs training session for patients had been held in one surgery but some still struggled to understand the technology. Dr Prasad advised that receptionists were essential to the smooth functioning of a practice but that good ones were difficult to find. The pressure and aggressive and abusive behaviour that these receptionists were subjected to by patients then made it difficult to retain them and resulted in a huge staff turnover. Mr Spencer had provided Members with the North West London Integrated Care Board (NWL ICB) report on the organisation’s commitment to Integrated Neighbourhood Teams (INT). Three INTs had been created which were anchored by primary care with staff from various organisations being managed by one person. The INTs aimed to deliver more care closer to people’s homes by: 1. providing same day urgent primary care for people with noncomplex needs who regularly sought same day access to primary care (33% of all GP attendances) delivered through three Super Hubs. It was agreed that Mr Spencer would make arrangements for Committee Members to visit the Super Hubs as well as some of the GP practices. The three Super Hubs were not in ideal locations and not really big enough so alternative locations were currently being investigated; 2. delivering proactive care through risk stratification, case finding and enhanced case management for the 6,000 Hillingdon residents that were most at risk; and 3. implementing preventative and anticipatory care for a range of population health Joint Strategic Needs Assessment priorities such as hypertension and obesity. Although the estate was deemed to be a disabler, progress had been made in areas such as the completion of a pathway for a single point of access for all place physiotherapy referrals. This had been rolled out to three GP practices in the north neighbourhoods with a view to tackling the more complex east and west neighbourhoods from October 2024. Key to the success of integrated working was the colocation of teams in a single space. This had been quite a challenge. Mr Spencer had also been working with the Council and NWL ICB to get clarity on investment in the out of hospital estate but the ICB had no capital money - an estate option appraisal was essential. Members had requested a report on the use of s106 health related monies and the Democratic, Civic and Ceremonial Manager would see if this report could be brought to the next meeting on 12 November 2024. Dr Prasad advised that it was important that people knew where the services were located. Neighbourhood Directors had been appointed (some had been in post for a couple of months and some for a couple of weeks) and were helping to develop integrated care teams to support the wrap around service around the patient to prevent GP time from being wasted doing referrals. The next step would be to enable self- referrals which would reduce the number of “Did Not Attends” (DNAs). It was agreed that further information on the work and impact of the Neighbourhood Directors would be presented at a future meeting. Work was being undertaken with Hillingdon Hospital to bring specialist mental health and respiratory staff into the community. These pathways were currently being organised. It was hoped that a system would be put in place that enabled a resident to type in their postcode and for them to be provided with a list of services that were available to them. Members recognised that there was an ambition to provide a seven day service. Mr Spencer advised that the focus was currently on the provision of a discharge service over seven days. Ms Eves was currently working on this with Ms Rachel Tunstall, Deputy Chief Operating Officer at THH, to get earlier discharge from the hospital. Ms Eves confirmed that the number of hospital discharges reduced over the weekends and that senior decision making was needed seven days a week (the Trust had seen a difference during the pandemic when senior decision makers had been in place seven days a week). Healthwatch Hillingdon (HH) Ms Lisa Taylor, Managing Director at HH, advised that the concerns raised by residents with HH had been reflected in the discussion: staff attitudes in primary care; digital services, e.g., blood tests and PATCHs; mental health in the community; and hospital waits. It was good to hear that mental health was being prioritised. HH had undertaken a review of the Riverside inpatient units. Whilst there were lots of areas of good practice, there were also areas for improvement around things like security, privacy and motivation for physical activity. Arising from HH’s findings, CNWL had developed an improvement plan. Ms Taylor would be looking to review progress on the actions contained therein in twelve months time to establish what impact they had had. A review of children and young people’s mental health and wellbeing services had been undertaken which had highlighted the poorer outcomes related to health inequalities. HH had facilitated a number of workshops to try to understand the barriers. Lots of activity had been planned to hear from parents and schools (school support appeared to be inconsistent). The findings would be reported to North West London Integrated Care Board and it was hoped that it would influence service delivery. The spend on mental health services needed to be reviewed to front load it for early intervention and prevention initiatives. Conversations needed to be held earlier in schools and peer support and mentoring needed to be widely available. There also needed to be greater flexibility in the services that were provided and a culture change. Ms Taylor advised that one of the key deliverables had been to coproduce the report with the voluntary sector providers that were currently providing support to these young people. As HH was thought to be independent, it was best placed to organise an event early next year to come up with solutions and facilitate a change in mindset. This could result in the creation of a consortium. A survey on GP access had commenced. Significant targeted engagement had been undertaken and more than 200 responses had been received to date. RESOLVED: That: 1. Mr Keith Spencer forward the results of the investigations being undertaken by Brunel University around A&E attendance to the Democratic, Civic and Ceremonial Manager to share with Members of the Committee; 2. Ms Claire Eves provide data on whether the Cove Café was reaching as many people as it could to the Democratic, Civic and Ceremonial Manager for circulation to the Committee; 3. Ms Claire Eves provide more detailed information on community hubs supporting people in the community before they reached crisis and non- residents presenting at Hillingdon A&E with mental health issues at the Committee’s next health updates meeting; 4. Ms Claire Eves provide the Democratic, Civic and Ceremonial Manager with detailed information about what was new about the ARCH service for circulation to the Committee; 5. Ms Claire Eves provide Members with information about how Kooth and the wider package of services had improved outcomes for service users and prevented the use of other services through de-escalation; 6. Mr Keith Spencer and Ms Claire Eves attend the Committee’s next meeting on 12 November 2024 to talk about the evaluation report of the wellbeing bus pilot that was undertaken in the Heathrow Villages; 7. Ms Claire Eves provide Members with an update on the NHSs withdrawal of speech and language therapy services from a school in Ruislip in May 2024; 8. Mr Chris Reed provide Members with an update on the LAS staff survey and whether or not it had been impacted by the direct action taken to support staff experiencing sexual and other harassment at the meeting on 23 January 2025; 9. Mr Chris Reed provide Members with information about the work of the LGBTQ+ focus group to ensure that the LAS workforce represented the people that it served at the meeting on 23 January 2025; 10. Mr Keith Spencer liaise with the Democratic, Civic and Ceremonial Manager to make arrangements for Committee Members to visit the Super Hubs as well as some of the GP practices; 11. the Democratic, Civic and Ceremonial Manager establish whether or not a report on the use of s106 health related monies could be brought to the next meeting on 12 November 2024; 12. Dr Ritu Prasad provide further information on the work and impact of the Neighbourhood Directors at the meeting on 23 January 2025; and 13. the discussion be noted. 34. CABINET FORWARD PLAN MONTHLY MONITORING (Agenda Item 6) Consideration was given to the Cabinet Forward Plan. RESOLVED: That the Cabinet Forward Plan be noted. 35. WORK PROGRAMME (Agenda Item 7) Consideration was given to the Committee’s Work Programme. It was agreed that the following changes be made to the Programme:  12 November 2024 – move consideration of the scoping report of the major review of adult social care early intervention and prevention to 12 November 2024 and hold the witness sessions on 25 February, 19 March and June 2025, with the final report being considered in July / September 2025;  12 November 2024 – hold a single meeting review of pharmacies on 12 November 2024;  12 November 2024 – include an item to discuss the evaluation of the wellbeing bus pilot that had taken place in Heathrow Villages;  12 November 2024 – receive a report on the use of Section 106 monies on health related projects at the meeting on 12 November 2024; and  23 January 2025 – receive an update from the Cabinet Member for Health and Social Care and the Corporate Director for Adult Social Care and Health at the meeting on 23 January 2025 in relation to the CQC report and other matters. It was noted that reports had been planned for consideration at the next meeting on 12 November 2024 on a range of issues such as the Older People’s Plan, 2024/25 BCF requirements and Autism Strategy consultation. The Democratic, Civic and Ceremonial Manager, in consultation with the Chair, would establish which reports needed to go to the next meeting and which could be deferred to a later date. RESOLVED: That the Work Programme, as amended, be agreed. The meeting, which commenced at 6.30 pm, closed at 8.57 pm. These are the minutes of the above meeting. For more information on any of the resolutions please contact Nikki O'Halloran on nohalloran@hillingdon.gov.uk. Circulation of these minutes is to Councillors, officers, the press and members of the public.

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

Attendance
Present: Councillor Nick Denys, Councillor Reeta Chamdal, Councillor Tony Burles, Councillor Philip Corthorne MCIPD, Councillor Scott Farley, Councillor Kelly Martin, Councillor June Nelson, Clinton Beale, Claire Eves, Dr Ritu Prasad, Chris Reed, Derval Russell, Jason Seez, Keith Spencer, Lisa Taylor, Nikki O'Halloran
Apologies: Councillor Sital Punja

Agenda

29. Apologies for absence
Apologies for absence had been received from Councillor Sital Punja (Councillor Scott Farley was present as her substitute).
30. Declarations of Interest in matters coming before this meeting
Councillor Kelly Martin declared a non-pecuniary interest in Agenda Item 5 – Health Updates as he worked part time at Harefield Hospital, and remained in the room during the consideration thereof.
31. Minutes of the meeting held on 11 September 2024 PDF 530 KB
It was noted that, whilst the minutes were a verbatim record of the meeting and gave a gist of the discussion that took place, a sentence had been missed off at the end of the third paragraph of Minute Number 25 in the hard copy version of the agenda (the online versions of the minutes and agenda were correct). The missing sentence read: “Mr Curry advised that he had spoken to Heathrow Airport about buying the hospice but that Heathrow had declined.” RESOLVED: That the amended minutes of the meeting held on 11 September 2024 be agreed as a correct record.
📄 Minutes of the meeting held on 11 September 2024 PDF 530 KB
Read the text of this document (10 pages)
Minutes HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE SELECT COMMITTEE 11 September 2024 Meeting held at Committee Room 6 - Civic Centre, High Street, Uxbridge UB8 1UW Committee Members Present: Councillors Nick Denys (Chair), Reeta Chamdal (Vice-Chair), Tony Burles, Philip Corthorne, Kelly Martin, June Nelson and Sital Punja (Opposition Lead) Also Present: Michael Breen, Michael Sobell Hospice Charity Trustee, Michael Sobell Hospice Charity Steve Curry, Chief Executive Officer, Harlington Hospice & Harlington Care Keith Spencer, Managing Director, Hillingdon Health and Care Partners (HHCP) Dr Ros Taylor, Medical Director, Michael Sobell House / Harlington Hospice LBH Officers Present: Nikki O'Halloran (Democratic, Civic and Ceremonial Manager) 21. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE (Agenda Item 1) Councillor Corthorne had advised that he would be attending the meeting but that he would be a little late. 22. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST IN MATTERS COMING BEFORE THIS MEETING (Agenda Item 2) There were no declarations of interest in matters coming before this meeting. 23. MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON 24 JULY 2024 (Agenda Item 3) The Chair noted that the Adult Social Care Market Position Statement report on 24 July’s agenda had stated, on page 31, that the capital/income ceiling for receiving financial support from the Council in meeting assessed Adult Social Care needs was £223,250 – this should have been £23,250. On page 54 of the same report, the capacity tracker had stated that 45% had been utilised by self-funders and 26% had been funded by local authorities and the NHS. For clarity, the report should have stated that the remaining 29% related to care home beds utilised by people referred by the Council. RESOLVED: That the minutes of the meeting held on 24 July 2024 be agreed as a correct record. 24. EXCLUSION OF PRESS AND PUBLIC (Agenda Item 4) RESOLVED: That all items of business be considered in public. Public Document Pack 25. HOSPICE AND END OF LIFE SERVICES IN HILLINGDON (Agenda Item 5) The Chair welcomed those present to the meeting and noted that a number of the Committee Members had attended a site visit at Michael Sobell House on Monday 9 September 2024 where they had had the opportunity to speak to staff, service users and their families about the palliative care services that were available in Hillingdon. An anonymised set of notes from this visit, setting out positive experiences and areas for improvement, would be appended to the minutes. Mr Steve Curry, Chief Executive of Harlington Hospice and Michael Sobell House, recognised that the proposed sale of Lansdowne House had been the cause of public concern. Lansdowne House was located in Harlington; it had always been a day hospice and provided three main services: lymphoedema service; emotional support and complementary therapy. In addition, there were services such as the Friendship café and the Legs 11 club. Although the building was nice, Lansdowne House was being underutilised (around 30% of its capacity was being used). It cost around £100k to run the building which was worth about £3.5m. Mr Curry stated that many hospices were running deficit budget this year so it was important that the charity maximised the use of its assets. Savings had already been made in relation to staffing levels but there had been a commitment to not cut services. The proposed sale of Lansdowne House would free up resources to be able to protect services. Mr Curry advised that he had spoken to Heathrow Airport about buying the hospice but that Heathrow had declined. Members noted that residents had expressed concerns about the sale of Lansdowne House, how the money raised from the sale would be used and the withdrawal of hospice services in the Heathrow Villages. Mr Curry advised that interim options had been included in the report to the Committee which included renting space in community buildings and providing services in residents’ own homes. Once the building had been sold, the charity would know what resources it would have to work with. A planning application process had previously been started before Michael Sobell House had temporarily closed. The planners had been approached again 12-18 months ago but they had not ben prepared to support the application. Reasons for refusal were complicated and included the proximity of Lansdowne House to a Grade 1 listed church, protected trees and its location on the edge of the green belt. The increase in the cost of living had meant that the cost of the materials and labour that would be needed for the development had increased significantly. Furthermore, if the third runway were ever to be agreed, the hospice would be within ¼ mile of the runway and under the flightpath which would not be conducive to the environment that a hospice needed. As such, it would need to be relocated. Mr Keith Spencer, Managing Director of Hillingdon Health and Care Partners, advised that Harlington Hospice was the lead organisation for end of life care in Hillingdon. He also noted that the issue of the building needed to be separated from the services that were provided. The services would continue to be provided in the broad locality so these services were not under threat. Although many individuals associated hospices with inpatient beds, it was noted that there were no beds at Harlington Hospice. It was suggested that end of life services in Hillingdon had been a huge success and that more money was going into these services than ever before. However, there were a number of residents who were unhappy about the sale of Lansdowne House as there was already a lack of services in the south of the Borough and this action appeared to be further reducing those services. Mr Curry and Mr Spencer assured the Committee that services would continue and they both committed to attending future meetings to evidence the continued provision of services in the south of the Borough. Mr Curry advised that Hillingdon compared very favourably with other London boroughs with regard to hospice and end of life care services. The charity worked in partnership with the Council and Mr Curry had been appointed as the Senior Responsible Officer for end of life care in Hillingdon. End of life care was all about fitting different types of care together so that individuals were able to “shape your care”. Palliative Specialist Community Care services were provided by Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (CNWL) which included a 24 hour nursing team that had been in place for about seven years (this was not a service provided elsewhere in North West London (NWL)). The services run by Harlington Hospice were the right services for carers and relatives (similar to those provided by Marie Curie) but also for patients in their final days of life. For example, they were able to talk frankly in relation to their thoughts and feelings about their situation. Mr Curry advised that Michael Sobell House had increased its capacity to fourteen beds. Of these, ten were commissioned acute beds and four were long term nurse led beds. In the first four months of 2023/24, 53 patients had been admitted to Michael Sobell House and eight had passed away whilst waiting for a bed. During the same period in 2024/25, 96 patients had been admitted and one had passed away. There had also been an increase in the number of patients that were discharged home after a stay at Michael Sobell House. In addition to the beds at Michael Sobell House, there were eight enhanced nursing home beds (two at Hayes Cottage Nursing Home and six at Park Field Nursing Home in Uxbridge). This provision had been so successful that it was being replicated across NWL. A 24 hour advice line was also available and a team had been created to provide support to children and young people who were impacted by the loss of someone close to them (the team also worked with neurodiverse children). Mr Curry noted that the HPAL website had been developed and was available across NWL. This site highlighted the best resources relating to palliative and end of life care in an easily accessible way for clinicians and patients in NWL. An adult bereavement service was also provided. All of these services had been provided using a combination of charitable funds, and funding from the local authority and NHS. Although the NHS had contributed an additional £300k this year (on top of the £2.5m), the charity still needed to raise at least £2.5m through fundraising each year to maintain the services. It was noted that end of life care had been a top priority in Hillingdon for the last 3-4 years. However, there continued to be issues with regard to the coordination of the different services and further work was needed for the earlier identification of those individuals who would benefit from services. The end of life dashboard had been developed, identifying around 3,700 people in Hillingdon that would benefit from palliative care. Currently, Harlington Hospice had contact with 20% of individuals in the Borough who would benefit from end of life care and provided care to only 17%. With regard to the 80% of those who would benefit from end of life care but who had no contact with the hospice, Mr Curry advised that the majority of these individuals died in hospital despite them not wanting to die in that setting. Of those who were taken to A&E, 95% would be admitted to hospital and were then unable to get out for some time as they were too ill. Dr Ros Taylor, Medical Director at Michael Sobell House and Harlington Hospice, advised that, if patients were referred to palliative care early, they would have less pain, would experience less depression and would have a better end of life. In terms of funding, a pilot was being undertaken to look at what action was needed to help move individuals out of hospital faster. The Council had also contributed funding to provide respite for carers. A clinical model (PICS) had been developed for the delivery of end of life services. PICS coordination provided oversight and assurance that care was managed and would support and respond outside standard working hours. The hospice had been working closely with service providers in the Borough on this model. Although there had been a focus on providing additional beds, there had also been a focus on improving the experience of patients and their families. It was important to maximise the resources available to deliver the most services possible. Dr Taylor advised that, many years ago, palliative care only related to cancer and end of life care. Members had seen from their visit to Michael Sobell House on Monday that this was no longer the case as many patients were there for things like pain management. There were also patients with complications that could be better addressed by a hospice than by a hospital. As such, a lot of the work undertaken by the hospice was in relation to the coordination of services to best meet the patient’s needs. Members recognised that the work undertaken at Michael Sobell House benefitted the families as much as it benefitted the patients. There was often a lot of talk about healthcare but the focus tended to be on treatment (heath) rather than care. Patients at Michael Sobell House had described how lonely they had felt when they had been in hospital and how staff there had not had the time to be interested in their care. It was suggested that the provision of end of life and hospice services should be a fundamental part of the NHS and not something that was reliant on charitable fundraising. Mr Spencer advised that the integration of care across boundaries continued to be a challenge and resulted in patients being kept in hospital for too long. Hospice resources had been used in hospital to help speed up discharge as this would free up resources there which could then be used for palliative care. Mr Spencer noted that Mr Curry and colleagues had been working with the hospital to bring about the cultural change that was needed. Mr Curry had met twice with the hospital this week to try to move end of life care forward but these changes took time (there had been significant progress on elements of this over the last ten years). It was not about spending more money, it was about spending the existing money in the right place and should always deliver the best patient outcomes. Members queried why a cultural change was preferred over a directive to then be able to take the money away and put it where it was actually needed. It was noted that there was a financial deficit in the NWL system. It would be important to bring clinical hearts and minds along on these changes (which were supported by the hospital leadership team). The challenge was that, on Saturdays and Sunday, clinicians made decisions about discharge and they needed to be encouraged to sort this out quicker. Mr Michael Breen, Chair of the Board at Michael Sobell House and Harlington Hospice, advised that the charity was in a difficult position and needed to be clever with the money that it had. He noted that the charity had raised some funds by delivering on contracts for the NHS. When the Covid pandemic started in 2020, the charity had had to adjust the way that it handled and raised funds. The cost of living crisis had exacerbated this and had increased overheads such as utilities and salaries. In 2023/24, the charity had had a £500k deficit and roughly the same would be expected at the end of the current financial year. As such, it was important that the charity looked at its assets. Mr Breen assured Members that the charity would not be reducing the services that it provided. The Board had established that the proposed sale of Lansdowne House would provide a cashflow reprieve and ensure continued services. Once the financial future of the charity had been secured, further investigations could be undertaken to increase the number of beds available - conversations had already started with Brunel University on a way forward but a liquid balance sheet was needed to be able to attract social fundraising to grow services. Brunel University had land available in Hillingdon and was always on the lookout for placements for its students. Discussions had started in relation to the development of a hospice facility on the Brunel site with acute palliative beds plus longer term beds that would be funded differently (a total of around 60-70 beds). Brunel students would benefit from placements and the hospice would benefit from the students being able to help staff the facility. This initiative could not currently be progressed as funds needed to be raised for the project plans. There were no definite timeframes for deliverables at this stage. Concern was expressed that some patients did not find out about the palliative care services that were available until far too late in their journey when this was information that should have been available to them right at the start. Mr Spencer advised that Mr Curry had been working with Hillingdon Hospital on the integrated management system and progress was being made, albeit slowly. The new system would help with data recording. It was agreed that partners (including representatives from Hillingdon Hospital) attend a future meeting to provide Members with an update on the integration of palliative care services in Hillingdon. Dr Taylor stated that an audit of around 100 hospice patients had been undertaken in the previous year across a number of hospitals. Most of these patients had had a very long wait before being referred to the hospice. Unfortunately, many consultants were not aware of the palliative care services that were available to patients. Dr Taylor had set up a roundtable with geriatricians and other specialist to talk to them about the benefits of early referral. Members noted that inappropriate hospital admissions and over-treatment could be reduced through systematic advance care planning. These plans should be started when GPs identified someone with a life limiting illness but they seemed to primarily be completed by palliative care staff. Conversations need to be undertaken with the patient and healthcare professionals needed to be recording the patient’s wishes in their universal care plan but it was often too late / after they had been admitted to hospital. Concern was expressed that NWL Integrated Care Board (NWL ICB) seemed to think that Hillingdon needed fewer hospice beds rather than more. Mr Curry advised that the NWL review had had a narrow remit in relation to specialised palliative care teams in the community. The consultants had looked at how many beds there were across the country and looked at a part of the system in isolation (high cost / small units that were mostly built 20-30 years ago and no longer met patients’ needs). Mr Spencer stated that he led on the work of the Better Care Fund in Hillingdon. The NWL ICB had advised that there should be a common offer across all eight of the NWL boroughs unless specific needs had been identified that needed a different approach. Hillingdon had been using data to illustrate the differences between Hillingdon’s needs and those of the other seven NWL boroughs. It was noted that quite a lot of the NWL common model had been copied from what had been developed in Hillingdon. In terms of representation, it was noted that the Chair sat on the NWL Joint Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee and took the approach that good people ought to be allowed to do good things. It was recognised that the health culture within the Borough was thought to be different to the other seven NWL boroughs and there was concern about having to “level down” in Hillingdon. Mr Curry advised that H4All was about to start a consultation on end of life and hospice services. Despite the standardisation requirement in NWL, the ICB had agreed that Hillingdon could continue to deliver its current services, acting as a kind of experiment. The Chair advised that the Committee would be responding to this consultation. Patients in need of palliative care were going to A&E and being admitted to hospital. Members queried how patients were signposted to stop them from going to A&E and how assurance could be made that there would be sufficient capacity in palliative care services to cope with this demand. Mr Spencer would be asked to provide a response to this. Dr Taylor advised that those in need of palliative care would benefit from the availability of a single telephone number to call so that they didn’t go to A&E. Mr Curry offered an open invitation for any Councillor to arrange a site visit to Michael Sobell House. RESOLVED: That: 1. partners (including representatives from Hillingdon Hospital) be invited to attend a future meeting to provide Members with an update on the integration of palliative care services in Hillingdon; 2. Mr Spencer provide Members with information about how patients were signposted to stop them from going to A&E and assurance that there would be sufficient capacity in palliative care services to cope with demand; and 3. the discussion be noted. 26. 2025/26 BUDGET PLANNING REPORT FOR SERVICES WITHIN THE REMIT OF THE HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE SELECT COMMITTEE (Agenda Item 6) The Chair advised that budgets were being reviewed by the newly appointed Corporate Director of Finance, who would also consider how future financial performance was reported to Members. As such, there would be no budget report this month. 27. CABINET FORWARD PLAN MONTHLY MONITORING (Agenda Item 7) Consideration was given to the Cabinet Forward Plan. RESOLVED: That the Cabinet Forward Plan be noted. 28. WORK PROGRAMME (Agenda Item 8) Consideration was given to the Committee’s Work Programme. It was noted that Cabinet would now be considering the Annual Older People’s Plan at its meeting on 12 December 2024. As such, the Health and Social Care Select Committee would be able to consider and comment on the report at its meeting on 12 November 2024. Councillor Corthorne suggested that adult social care be scrutinsed in line with the CQC framework. It was agreed that the Cabinet Member for Health and Social Care and the Corporate Director of Adult Social Care and Health be invited to a future meeting (possibly 9 October 2024 or 12 November 2024) once the CQC inspection report had been published. RESOLVED: That: 1. the Annual Older People’s Plan be considered at the meeting on 12 November 2024; 2. the Cabinet Member for Health and Social Care and the Corporate Director of Adult Social Care and Health be invited to a future meeti ng (possibly 9 October 2024 or 12 November 2024) once the CQC inspection report had been published; and 3. the Work Programme, as amended, be agreed. MICHAEL SOBELL HOUSE SITE VISIT NOTES - 9 SEPTEMBER 2024 The meeting, which commenced at 7.00 pm, closed at 8.28 pm. These are the minutes of the above meeting. For more information on any of the resolutions please contact Nikki O'Halloran on nohalloran@hillingdon.gov.uk. Circulation of these minutes is to Councillors, officers, the press and members of the public. This page is intentionally left blank MICHAEL SOBELL HOUSE SITE VISIT 2pm Monday 9 September 2024 ATTENDEES: Councillors Nick Denys, Philip Corthorne, June Nelson and Sital Punja, and Nikki O’Halloran  Harlington Hospice - provides clinics and daycare  Michael Sobell House (MSH) – provides inpatient care POSITIVE EXPERIENCES OF HOSPICE  Patients and their families have been able to build up relationships with the staff and their consultant and have been able to text/WhatsApp the consultant with their concerns as they arise.  MSH has given patients an extra lease of life before they pass away.  Palliative staff offer a human factor that answers the patient’s questions.  The night nurses / sitters are the most valuable part of the service.  It’s not just about physical support, it’s also about the emotional support that is provided.  Pain relief / management is better understood in a hospice (than in a hospital).  Staff in the hospice make time (where they can) to sit with patients to talk to them.  Patients value the opportunity to speak to other patients who are have the same / similar experiences.  Quieter and calmer at MSH than the hospital so able to get some much needed rest. Families are also able to stay over with patients.  Communication with patients and families has been really good – they are not treated as numbers.  There are no restrictions on visiting times.  It’s like a family.  Palliative care team at the hospital liaised with the patient. AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT  Food – although the head chef is always trying to accommodate everyone’s preferences and tastes.  Need to be given a point of contact for referral to hospice services if the offer is initially refused. And the different points of contact through a patient’s journey should continually offer hospice services as an option. It was like staff in the hospital were reading from a manual but never really offered anything. It felt disconnected and there was no collaboration between the difference medical professionals (e.g., GP and consultant).  MSH is rundown in comparison to places like the Marie Curie facility.  More family space is needed at MSH.  Palliative care nurse only started after the paperwork had come over from Charing Cross – this should have been earlier.  Need more funding for MSH – they should not have to rely on fundraising to provide the services that they do.  It would be good to have some continuity in hospital.  When in hospital, it feels like you are on your own – it’s very lonely. Page 1 Minute Annex This page is intentionally left blank

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

32. Exclusion of press and public
RESOLVED: That all items of business be considered in public.
33. Health Updates PDF 223 KB
The Chair welcomed those present to the meeting. As Members of the Committee needed time to be able to read and digest the information to be able to fulfil their statutory health scrutiny responsibilities, health partners were reminded of the requirement to provide written reports by the deadline provided (this was usually at least six clear working days before the meeting). The receipt of information any later than this materially hindered the Committee in its ability to fulfil this role. The Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (THH) Mr Jason Seez, Deputy Chief Executive at THH, advised that the Trust had achieved 78.4% against its 4 hour A&E target in 2023/24 (compared to 76% in the previous year). However, it was recognised that there was still room for improvement and that there would be a focus on Type 1 performance (the more serious presentations). As at July 2024, the Trust had achieved 71.83% all-type performance against the national target of 76%. Although THH was currently below target, there were a number of improvement initiatives in place to support this. Mr Chris Reed, Hillingdon Group Manager at The London Ambulance Service NHS Trust (LAS), advised that the LAS had seen a 13% increase in the number of Category 1 calls with higher acuity so resolving this issue would need a joined up approach. Dr Ritu Prasad, Chair of Hillingdon GP Confederation, advised that Hillingdon had an ageing population with multi morbidities and that GPs were seeing an increase in the number of acute presentations. Mr Keith Spencer, Managing Director at Hillingdon Health and Care Partners, advised that Brunel University had been commissioned to undertake an investigation into why patients were going to A&E (e.g., were they more ill than previously?). Once this work had been completed, Mr Spencer would forward the results to the Democratic, Civic and Ceremonial Manager to share with Members of the Committee. Concern was expressed that there had been an increase in the number of patients presenting at A&E that were then admitted to hospital. It was queried whether residents were turning up at A&E as a last resort as they had no other options. Mr Spencer advised that this had been the topic of regular discussions. There may have been alternative pathways that these patients could have used but the data suggested that the majority of patients attending ED at weekends and after 5pm during the week were lower acuity which would suggest that it was because they were unable to get a convenient GP appointment. Although the winter pressure beds would usually help to accommodate demand during the increased winter activity, these tended to be open all year round. As such, a whole system approach was needed to address the demand. The hospital redevelopment plan would help to bring partners together to keep patients out of hospital through a place-based transformation strategy. During 2023/24, £34.6m had been invested into the capital programme, largely in relation to buildings related to the redevelopment project. ... view the full minutes text for item 33.
📄 Health Updates PDF 223 KB
Read the text of this document (5 pages)
Health and Social Care Select Committee – 9 October 2024 Classification: Public HEALTH UPDATES Committee name Health and Social Care Select Committee Officer reporting Nikki O’Halloran, Democratic Services Papers with report Appendix A – The Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Update Appendix B – Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals Update Ward n/a HEADLINES To enable the Committee to receive updates and review the work being undertaken with regard to the provision of health services within the Borough. RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Health and Social Care Select Committee notes the presentations. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Hillingdon Health and Care Partners (HHCP) Hillingdon Health and Care Partners (HHCP) is the ‘Place Based’ alliance of health and care organisations that seeks, through collaboration and co-design, to make significant improvements to the quality and cost of care in Hillingdon. HHCP is made up of Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (CNWL), H4All (a partnership of voluntary sector health care providers) and Hillingdon’s Confederation (which brings together all of Hillingdon’s GPs). HHCP works together closely with the London Borough of Hillingdon and North West London Integrated Care Board (NWL ICB) to deliver 3 key strategic aims:  Improving the outcomes for our population - delivering Hillingdon’s Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategy  Delivery of sustainable, person-centred, joined up models of care aligned to the new hospital plans and activity assumptions  Delivering the NWL Integrated Care System (ICS) priorities through local care models building from a population health management approach Shared delivery models are through 6 integrated Neighbourhood Teams and a range of joined up Borough wide teams across health and care. The Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (THH) The Hillingdon Hospitals supplies services from two sites; Hillingdon Hospital and Mount Vernon Hospital and has an annual turnover of around £320 million, employing approximately 3,700 staff. We are proud to deliver services for our local borough of Hillingdon, and to those living in the surrounding areas of Ealing, Harrow, Buckinghamshire and Hertfordshire, giving us a total catchment population of over 350,000. Hillingdon Hospital is the only acute hospital in the London Borough of Hillingdon and offers a wide range of services, including accident and emergency (A&E), inpatient care, day surgery, outpatient clinics and maternity services. The Health and Social Care Select Committee – 9 October 2024 Classification: Public Trust’s services at Mount Vernon Hospital include routine day surgery, an Urgent Care Nurse Practitioner service and outpatient clinics. The Trust hosts several other organisations that supply health services at the Mount Vernon site including East & North Hertfordshire NHS Trust’s Cancer Centre. Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals (RBH) The Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals merged with Guy's and St Thomas’s NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT) in February 2021 and, from April 2022, joined with the cardiorespiratory services at GSTT to form a new Heart & Lung & Critical Care Group across the three sites. At the same time, the Evelina Children’s Hospital took over the running of the paediatric services at Royal Brompton. The merger of the two NHS foundation trusts was approved by the Boards and Councils of Governors of both organisations in December 2020 and came into effect on 1 February 2021. This merger saw the creation of a newly expanded Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, with Royal Brompton and Harefield forming a new Clinical Group within the Trust. Since 2017, Guy’s and St Thomas’ and Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trusts have been working together, and with colleagues across King’s Health Partners, to develop plans to transform care for adults and children with heart and lung disease. This merger is a key step towards achieving these ambitions. To begin with, the merger will mean clinicians and teams working more closely together, building on the partnership work over the last three years, but generally providing services to the same patients and in the same places as they do now. Subject to the necessary public consultation, children’s services will move from the Royal Brompton Hospital site to an expanded Evelina London Children’s Hospital at St Thomas’ in around four to five years’ time. Subsequently, and again subject to consultation, the Trust hopes to build a new centre for heart and lung services at St Thomas’, which will be the home to adult heart and lung services from across the new Trust and potentially other partners as well. There are no plans to move services from Harefield Hospital, but these services will be an integral part of the integration across the new Trust. Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (CNWL) CNWL is a large and diverse organisation, providing health care services for people with a wide range of physical and mental health needs. The Trust employs approximately 7,000 staff who provide integrated healthcare (more than 300 different health services) across 150 sites and in many other community settings. Types of services include:  Physical health: Community treatment for physical conditions that do not require general hospital treatment or conditions that require long-term care. This includes district nursing, health visitors, stroke care and support for people in recovery.  Mental health: Community and hospital treatment for children, adults and older people with mental health problems. Services range from counselling support for mild conditions to rehabilitation treatment for long and enduring mental health problems.  Learning disabilities: Assessment and treatment for people with learning disabilities who also have complex mental health needs and/or challenging behaviour. Services are provided in the community or hospital.  Eating disorders: Admission to hospital or appointment sessions are provided to support men and women with an eating disorder. Health and Social Care Select Committee – 9 October 2024 Classification: Public  Addictions: Community drug and alcohol treatment services are provided, as well as hospital admission when it is needed. Specialist services to address problem gambling, compulsive behaviour and club drug problems are also available.  Sexual health: Appointment and walk-in services are available for anyone who needs them. This includes contraceptive choices, treatment of sexually transmitted infections and HIV testing and treatment.  Prison and offender care: Full healthcare services, including primary healthcare, addictions and mental health support, are provided in a number of prisons. Mental health support is also provided in the community for people who have offended in the past or people at risk of offending. North West London Integrated Care System (NWL ICS) In response to the NHS long term plan, which suggested that the number of CCGs will be significantly reduced to align with the number of emergi ng Integrated C are Systems (ICSs), North West London (NWL) CCGs launched a case for change for commissioning reform on 29 May 2019. The case for change recognised that there were questions on how the CCGs respond to the configuration issues raised by the long term plan which required exploration and resolution. Following the engagement period , the recommendation to governing bodies was to proceed to a formal merger of CCGs from 1 April 2021 , using 2020/21 as a transition year to focus on the following:  System financial recovery  Development of integrated care at PCN, borough and ICS level  Building closer working relationships with the local authorities  The development of a single operating structure across the commissioning system, and meet the expectation s of NHSE that the CCG would operate in 2020/21 under a single operating framework, with the associated reduction in management costs and streamlined governance  To work with providers to develop alternative reimbursement structures from 2020/21 to support delivery of ICP/ICS On 1 April 2021, the eight Clinical Commissioning Groups in North West London (NWL) became one organisation, and the ICS then came into being in 2022. The London Ambulance Service NHS Trust (LAS) The London Ambulance Service (LAS) answers more 999 and NHS 111 calls than any other ambulance service in the UK. LAS crews go to more than 3,000 emergencies each day and handle over two million 999 calls a year. Its 24-hour 111 integrated urgent care services in north east and south east London answer more than 1.2 million calls a year. The LAS has recently been awarded a three-year contract to provide the NHS 111 service to the two million people who live in North West London, beginning on Thursday 17 November 2022. The organisation will also take on responsibility for running the North West London Clinical Assessment Service (CAS) which helps to decide where patients who call-in would be best cared for. The LAS is the only NHS provider trust to serve the whole of London and the nine million people who live in, work in or visit the city. The Trust covers an area of 620sq miles and its average response time to the most serious emergencies is less than seven minutes. Health and Social Care Select Committee – 9 October 2024 Classification: Public The LAS has 8,000 people who work or volunteer for it and together they are striving to ensure patients receive the right response, in the right place, at the right time. The Trust works closely with its NHS partners including: NHS England (which commissions the LAS); hospitals; specialist trusts; and the five Integrated Care Systems (ICS). The LAS plays a leading role in integrating access to emergency and urgent care in the capital. Its collaboration with the Metropolitan Police Service, London Fire Brigade, London’s Air Ambulance and London’s Resilience Forums means that the Trust is ready and prepared to respond to major incidents and ensure that they keep Londoners safe. By integrating the 999 and 111 services, the LAS is able to treat more patients over the phone; in their home; or refer them to appropriate care in their own community. This is key in achieving the LAS’ strategic ambition of reducing the number of unnecessary trips to hospital and should mean 122,000 fewer patients a year being taken to emergency departments. Healthwatch Hillingdon Healthwatch Hillingdon is a health watchdog run by and for local people. It is independent of the NHS and the local Council. Healthwatch Hillingdon aims to help residents get the best out of their health and social care services such as doctors, dentists, hospitals and mental health services and gives them a voice so that they can influence and challenge how health and care services are provided throughout Hillingdon. Healthwatch Hillingdon can also provide residents with information about local health and care services, and support individuals if they need help to resolve a complaint about their NHS treatment or social care. Healthwatch Hillingdon is one of 152 community focused local Healthwatch. Together, they form the Healthwatch network, working closely to ensure consumers’ views are represented locally and nationally led by Healthwatch England. Healthwatch Hillingdon is all about local voices being able to influence the delivery and design of local services. Not just people who use them, but anyone who might need to in the future. By making sure the views and experiences of all people who use services are gathered, analysed and acted upon, Healthwatch can help make services better now and in the future. To make sure that the voices of children and young people are heard, Healthwatch Hillingdon created Young Healthwatch Hillingdon (YHwH). YHwH is made up of volunteers who represent the views of children and young people living, working or studying in Hillingdon. They do this by: o Sharing and promoting information about health issues and services that affect children and young people through events, social media updates and reports. o Speaking to children and young people and gathering their views about what health issues and services are important to them. o Working with health and social care services representatives to try to shape and improve services for children and young people. Witnesses Representatives from the following organisations have been invited to attend the meeting: 1. Hillingdon Health and Care Partners (HHCP) 2. The Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (THH) Health and Social Care Select Committee – 9 October 2024 Classification: Public 3. Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (RBH) 4. Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (CNWL) 5. North West London Integrated Care Board (NWL ICB) 6. The London Ambulance Service NHS Trust (LAS) 7. Healthwatch Hillingdon (HH) 8. Hillingdon GP Confederation

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

📄 Appendix A - THH.doc , item 33. PDF 277 KB
Read the text of this document (3 pages)
APPENDIX A The Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Briefing Report for the Health and Social Care Select Committee October 2024 1.0 Care Quality Commission Inspection Update The Care Quality Commission (CQC) carried unannounced inspections of Urgent and Emergency Care and Surgical Care core services at Hillingdon Hospital and Mount Vernon Hospital in July and August 2024. Inspections have been undertaken under the CQC’s new single assessment framework. The Trust received an extensive evidence information request following the inspections. The submission of all the requested evidence is now completed. The Trust received high level feedback from the CQC which positively commented on the compassionate and kind care that they observed by our staff during the inspection. The CQC did however raise a series of concerns following the inspection which the Trust are immediately addressing. The Trust has developed a robust action plan for the issues raised by the CQC and established a series of biweekly meetings chaired by the Chief Nurse with representation from divisions and corporate functions to swiftly work through the actions identified further supported by strong Board oversight. The CQC has also conducted a well-led inspection between the 24 and 26 September 2024. 2.0 Elective Performance The Trust is best in the North West London Acute Provider Collaborative for its Referral to Treatment (RTT) performance with the following position at 31 August 2024: • Zero patients waiting 104 weeks • Zero patients waiting 78 weeks • 9 patients waiting 65 weeks The Trust aims to achieve zero patients waiting 65 weeks by the end of October 2024. In addition, the Trust has set an ambitious stretch target of zero patients waiting 52 weeks by 31 December 2024. The Trust has outperformed our activity plan targets and is on trajectory to significantly outperform the activity target for 2024/25. The Trust is also the best in the North West London Acute Provider Collaborative against the diagnostic waiting times standard. The Trust achieved 88.6% against a target of 95% patients waiting 6 weeks for a diagnostic test. APPENDIX A The Trust achieved 80.5% against the Cancer Faster Diagnosis Standard (FDS) which means patients with suspected cancer who are referred for urgent cancer checks from a GP, screening programme or other route should be diagnosed or have cancer ruled out within 28 days. The Trust has now achieved the FDS performance target 6 months in a row. The Trust aims to have below 53 patients with a length of stay in hospital of 21 days at any time. Latest validated data (August 2024) recorded 62 patients with a length of stay in hospital of 21 days and over. 3.0 UEC Performance, Discharge and Flow The Trust performance in August 2024 remains challenged with all type performance unchanged compared to July 2024. Focused work is on-going with Hillingdon Health and Care Partners to improve the Trust’s discharge profile and manage length of stay. A place-based initiative was undertaken in July 2024 with a focus on improving discharges across medical wards. Through this work the Trust were able to demonstrate an improvement in the number of discharges delivered by 5pm during August. Opportunities for improvement and further work include the implementation of an integrated therapy team across acute and community services, the implementation of an integrated Place based end of life service based on an agreed common pathway and re-appraising how community based active case management is undertaken for patients with complex needs. 4.0 Hillingdon Hospital Redevelopment Update We have continued to make progress with our redevelopment plans, which have strong support from stakeholders - the new hospital will be a state -of-the-art facility, delivering first-rate care for our patients and providing the best pl ace to work for our people. Our enabling and decant programme to clear the western part of the Hillingdon Hospital site in preparation for the construction of the new hospital and multi-storey car park and to ensure that the existing hospital remains operational throughout construction has continued to progress:  Construction works have commenced to modernise the Furze building in preparation for the provision of Adult Audiology, Haematology, the Education and Training Library and clinical administration services.  Design, planning applications and commercial procurement activities are progressing for the remainder of the enabling and decant projects.  Planning approval has been granted for future demolition work and a part demolition / extension to the hospital restaurant.  Civil engineering works relating to the new hospital power supply are progressing. APPENDIX A  A number of our wards along the annexe co rridor have been closed off and are being made ready for demolition. We are particularly grateful to our stakeholders , especially to the Council and our political stakeholders, partners, staff colleagues, patients and local people for their support and cooperation while these important preparatory works take place. At a national level, on the 29 July 2024 the Chancellor announced a review of the New Hospital Programme to ensure that it has a ‘thorough, realistic and costed timetable for delivery’. The review excludes hospitals with reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (RAAC) and those with Full Business Case approval f or their main build phase, leaving 25 schemes in scope, including Hillingdon. The review will consider the possible timelines for delivery for each scheme and cost profiles and will feed into the Government’s Spending Review process, so we expect to know t he outcome in October 2024. While the review takes place and we get the hospital site ready for construction, we are continuing to work closely with the national New Hospital Programme team. This has included progressing work to identify opportunities to modify and standardise elements of the new hospital design in line with emerging best practice – referred to as ‘Hospital 2.0’. Hospital 2.0 is a standardised design for future hospitals which will benefit patients and staff through digital solutions and an optimised hospital layout and is mandated for new hospitals in the national programme. The outcome of this work will inform future engagement with our stakeholders. Alongside this, we are continuing to engage with local people on the new hospital plans. Recent examples include attending the Hillingdon Business Expo 2024 (23 May 2024) and Hayes canal festival (23 June 2024) and running stalls at the Colne Union PCN Roadshow (31 July 2024) and the Hillingdon Family Play Day (7 August 2024). We also welcomed the new local MP for Uxbri dge and South Ruislip to Hillingdon Hospital in July 2024 to receive an update on the redevelopment. Following this, a letter was submitted by the Trust’s local MP to the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care describing the urgent case for a new ho spital and the state of readiness, pace and progress that has already been achieved by the new Hillingdon Hospital Redevelopment Team.

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

📄 Appendix B - RBH , item 33. PDF 154 KB
Read the text of this document (2 pages)
Appendix B Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals Briefing Report for the Health and Social Care Select Committee September 2024 Elective activity The volume of elective activity undertaken over the last 3 months has been adversely affected by the Synnovis ransomware cyber-attack which occurred on 3rd June 2024. This attack affected pathology services within community and hospital sites across all of Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and Kings’ College Hospital NHS Trust. Following the attack, the process for cross matching blood for a patient having surgery had to be undertaken manually which was very time consuming and required additional manual checks for safety purposes. Surgical and complex cardiology cases were all reviewed daily to ensure there were sufficient stocks of blood before they could proceed. The Synnovis digital interfaces connecting the laboratories with hospital and community services had to all be rebuilt. The restoration of Blood Transfusion Services has been the final part of the recovery action plan and this was reconnected on 22nd September and full testing commenced. There are currently 570 patients waiting for cardiac surgery at the Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital which is less than the 600 reported in January 2024 . Progress in reducing the volume of patients waiting has been affected by the Synnovis cyber attack as described above. The Trust continues to use the Ortis platform to closely monitor patients waiting for surgery and this detects any clinical deterioration of patients that indicates a further Consultant review. With regards to Referral to Treatment (RTT) and long waiting patients, the Heart, Lung and Critical Care Clinical Group predic t that there will be 8 vascular 78 -week waiting patients at the end of September 2024 and 70 vascular/cardiology patients waiting 65 weeks at the end of September 2024. Diagnostics Hospitals are measured against a DM01 standard which covers 15 diagnostic tests and 95% of all patients should receive their diagnostic test within 6 weeks of referral. A lot of work has been undertaken to reduce waiting times for diagnostics in modalities such as imaging (CT, MRI and Ultrasound) whic h are broadly compliant with the standard. Meeting the standard for Echo at Harefield has been challenging , primarily due t o capacity restraints within the Echo department. The department space has recently been restructured and an additional clinical Echo room created. We are also introducing a bed side discharge echo service on the wards which will create additional capaci ty for outpatient echos , as well as improving the discharge process for patients. The DM01 performance for sleep studies is currently the biggest concern for Brompton and Harefield Hospitals with neither meeting the 95% standard. Harefield performance is currently 81% and Brompton is at 45% but with considerable work being undertaken on the validation of the latter’s waiting list. 2 The purchase of additional sleep equipment has helped reduce the sleep waiting time but there remains some way to go. There are several GSTT hospital sites providing sleep studies so there is also work is being undertaken to review waiting lists and explore how the capacity issues can be best resolved. Cancer Both Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital sites are involved in the targeted Lung Heath Check programme that aims to find lung cancer early, sometimes before symptoms are even experienced. Harefield Hospital are leading the West London scan review meetings where all patient scans are triaged and signposte d for onward investigation and treatment where appropriate. This group reviews more than 100 patient scans a month. Regarding cancer performance, the 62 -day lung cancer pathway remains one of the most challenging. However, performance has improved with the number of breaches in late July being approximately 70 and by early September this had reduced to 43. Recruitment In April, it was reported that there was concern around the number of critical care nurse vacancies at that time, given so much of the s pecialised activity undertaken relies on critical care capacity. A very successful critical care nursing open day was held in February which resulted in 29 WTE nurses being recruited. The last of these new recruits has commence d employment and is currently in their supernumerary period. Electronic Patient Record (EPR) Following the GSTT and King’s EPIC rollout in O ctober 2023, the Trust is now moving into a period of optimisation and benefit realisation. Capital investment The concern regarding the constraint on NHS capital expenditure continues, particularly given the cardiology unit (ACCU) delivering level 1 (ward) and level 2 (high dependency) care will require replacements in the next 4 years due to deterioration of the current prefabricated building. Work is continuing to develop the Harefield Clinical Strategy which will inform what the Harefield Hospital estate is going to need to look like in the future.

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

📄 Appendix C - CNWL , item 33. PDF 832 KB
Read the text of this document (8 pages)
Appendix C Central and North West London Update October 2024 Work undertaken over the last six months Physical Health A large area of focus over the last six months has been the development of neighbourhood teams in Hillingdon and how CNWL teams form a core part of these multidisciplinary teams alongside GP’s, Social Care and voluntary sector organisations. We have already focused on aligning our nursing teams, particularly District Nursing, around the neighbourhood teams and are currently working through therapy alignment including MSK Physiotherapy. We believe that through this greater integrated working we will strengthen our links with primary care in particular, which will ensure better outcomes for patients through more integrated and aligned pathways. We also work really closely with Hillingdon Hospital on a range of areas including discharge pathways. We have been ensuring our teams, including Discharge To Assess and Home First, have clear pathways which adapt to need as required. Our Urgent Community Response team have consistently met their two-hour national waiting time target and seen consistent increase in performance with all sixty patients referred in August being seen within two hours of referral. In our children’s services we have been working really closely with the Local Authority to coordinate with the Family Hub and Stronger Families transformation. We have now signed a new collaboration agreement with the Local Authorities which will ensure we work in a much more integrated manner to maximise resources across the two organisations and align our priorities for children in the borough. As such we have launched a new transformation programme to develop new ways of working and better service delivery. Following a procurement exercise taken by NHS England to review childhood immunisation services across London, the Hillingdon childhood immunisation service has now transferred from CNWL to Vaccination UK from the 1 September. We have been working with Vaccination UK to ensure the service transferred safely with minimal impact to staff, children, families and schools. Vaccination UK have been communicating with all schools to ensure they are aware of the change and to inform them of their service offer going forward. Appendix C Adult Mental Health We continue to have an extensive crisis alternative pathway in adult mental health to ensure we can support system flow and pressures experienced on the crisis pathway, particularly as we move into winter. The below surmises each of the crisis alternative schemes that we have in place. Hillingdon Lighthouse Our Lighthouse in Hillingdon is located near A&E in Hillingdon Hospital and support patients attending A&E with a mental health crisis who do not need to be in A&E in a purpose-built environment designed to meet their needs. The offer is co-delivered with the voluntary sector and moved to a 24/7 model in January this year. This has allowed the Lighthouse to accept a higher complexity of patients and the number of patients being seen in the Lighthouse has increased significantly as a result. There appears to be a direct correlation on long stayers in A&E with a reduction in patients waiting more than 12 hours with a mental health need in the same timeframe. Crisis House Our Crisis House in Hillingdon is called The Retreat and is delivered by Comfort Care. There has been an upward trend recently in occupancy levels in the Crisis House which is showing the key role it plays in supporting our pressures in the crisis pathway elsewhere in the system. We are working with NWL ICB to undertake a full evaluation of our crisis alternatives which will be concluded in June and inform future funding decisions on whether to continue with The Retreat. Appendix C The Cove Opened in March 2023, the Cove Café is delivered by Hestia and provides a safe space for individuals to reduce their initial distress following referrals by clinical teams. We regularly seek service user feedback and 94% of service users are reporting that The Cove helped support them feeling better about managing their anxiety. High Intensity User (HIU) Service We have now relaunched our HIU service with the British Red to support mental health service users who are frequent users of mental health services included at A&E, community mental health teams and GP practices. It looks to build a resource structure around that individual that tackles unmet social needs with a view to better support them in the community. Mental Health Crisis Assessment Centre (MHCAS) Based at St Charles Hospital, CNWL’s MHCAS is a calm and therapeutic mental health setting to treat the majority of emergency mental health presentations. They see and assess anyone over 18 years old that would otherwise go to an emergency department for mental health reasons and does not have an urgent medical need (for example, an overdose of medication). Whilst not a Hillingdon specific resource, they take referrals from Hillingdon A&E and support our local system. Addictions, Recovery, Community, Hillingdon (ARCH) The main area of focus for us has been the mobilisation of the new ARCH service. To date we have: Appendix C  Foster a positive work environment with a focus on staff well-being, flexible recruitment and effective retention  Recruit into new roles (e.g. Principal Psychologist, Group Facilitator, Drug & Alcohol Trainer etc)  Ensure accessibility through various engagement methods (e.g. co-location and satellites)  12 week structured Recovery Day Programme (RDP)  Offering 7 day a week service including evening and weekend social drop-ins.  Prioritise volunteer opportunities with lived experience in the service and community  Deliver health interventions, including prescribing, BBV services, and community detoxification  Educate diverse groups and professionals to reduce health inequalities The below is a summary of the overall work we are doing in the service line. We have also held a Recovery Day Event on 20th September to celebrate ‘Recovery Month’. The celebration was an opportunity to showcase the fantastic work that ARCH does in Hillingdon and for visitors to get a taste of how each team specialises. Attendees had the chance to meet with staff, ex-service users and volunteers to hear personal stories of transformation, reinforcing the message that recovery is possible and that support is available. With a range of activities, including informational booths, interactive games and guest speakers, the Recovery Party fostered a sense of community and connection. Appendix C Children’s Mental Health A key area for focus for CAMHS transformation is ensuring children are seen at the right time, in the right place by the right person, using a need’s led approach which is Thrive informed. As part of this we have focused on developing our early intervention offer which supports people in a range of settings whether that is digitally, in Children Centres, schools or GP practices. Appendix C A key component of our early intervention support is our Mental Health Support Team (MHST) offer into schools. Hillingdon has been allocated Wave 11 funding starting from September 2024 for two new MHST’s to enhance our existing offer. We have recruited into the trainee posts who work with the schools, and they are now in post and commenced their University training courses. We are also currently recruiting to the supervisor posts to support these trainees. This new wave of funding will bring Hillingdon in line with other boroughs in London with 60% coverage being offered to schools which was the NHS Long Term Plan commitment. We are awaiting confirmation from NHS England on whether the program will be further rolled out nationally to all schools. We have also expanded our core CAMHS offer with increases in the number of children accessing CAMHS, significantly reducing our waiting times and working with our system partners to embed Thrive across the system. The number of children waiting have reduced significantly over the last couple of years and there has been a significant drop in the number of children waiting for treatment particularly over the last year as shown in the below graph. Young Adult New Models of Care Driven by our Young Adult Forum consisting of service users, we have been radically improving our offer to young adults aged 16 to 25 years of age. Our new Young Adults Partnership Panel in Hillingdon aims to better manage young adults’ transitions from children to adult’s mental health services. Over the last six months, key areas of progress have been:  Soft launch of the CNWL Discovery College (YA focused Recovery College) – currently running courses for young adults on “Preparing for University”  Launch of the young adults Peer Support Service – Hillingdon has a dedicated peer support worker for young adults and also supporting other young adults projects (e.g. Discovery College)  Awarded funding to higher education organisations and voluntary sector organisations to support early intervention and prevention of eating disorders  Roll out of Me First training – communications skills training aimed at supporting professionals to effectively communicate and engage with young adults. Appendix C Targets and Performance Within the NHS Long Term Plan there are a number of targets which NHS organisations are expected to deliver against. For children’s services this predominately focuses on the number of children accessing CAMHS and CAMHS waiting times, both of which we have been achieving in Hillingdon as per the table below through the additional capacity we have put into our children mental health teams. Our Talking Therapies team (IAPT) have to increase the number of people accessing their service year on year which was delivered last year, including waiting times for six- and eighteen-week targets. Our children’s services continue to deliver well against their targets across our 0-19 and Children’s Integrated Therapies (CIT’s) teams, and compare well when measured against other London boroughs. The table below outlines performance against 0-19 checks that the Health Visiting team are required to deliver. The below is a summary of our performance in ARCH:  The service has achieved a 100% success rate in meeting the target of 95% for new service users waiting times within three weeks.  The service has achieved a retention or completion rate of 96.8%, exceeding the target of 85% for retention or completion within 12 weeks.  The service has achieved a successful completion rate of 8.3% for opiates and 41.4% for alcohol, exceeding the national average.  The service has seen a 28.8% increase in the number of service users in structured treatment, rising from 1,196 in April 2022 to 1,540 to date. Appendix C  The service achieved Hep C micro-elimination in 2023 and has successfully sustained this status for six months.  The service has increased the percentage of individuals engaging in structured treatment following release from prison from 20.8% in April 2022 to 36.9% to date.

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

📄 Appendix D - LAS , item 33. PDF 2 MB
Read the text of this document (3 pages)
Update for Hillingdon Health and Social Care Select Committee – 9th October 2024 London Ambulance Service – Hillingdon Group Work the organisation has undertaken over the last six months: 1. Building on the ‘tethered fleet’ project that was reported in May, Hillingdon Group have taken part in a series of work streams that have empowered the group to take ownership and accountability for actions that were previously centralised to the Trust. This involves localised scheduling, tethered equipment and localised fleet allocation. 2. In response to the staff survey results and learning from reports into the culture of other emergency services, the Trust has taken significant steps to make sure everyone feels safe in the workplace. The Trust’s Sexual Safety Charter sets out our commitment to make sure everyone behaves in a way that ensures sexual safety and shows our commitment to take any concerns raised seriously with empathy and understanding. NHS England have recently referenced London Ambulance Service as a case study in a report on good practice on sexual safety in the workforce. Every front line team at the Hillingdon Group has had a training session delivered by the Group Manager regarding sexual safety. This is with the aim of ensuring staff feel safe and supported in reporting any wrongdoing and highlighting the welfare referrals that are available to staff. It is also to ensure that staff are categorically clear that the Trust will robustly manage any wrongdoing or breaches of the Sexual Safety Charter. 3. Staff took part in a multi-agency major incident exercise at Heathrow Airport on the 25th September 2024. This was a live exercise to test our response to an aircraft incident with the following intentions:  Prepare Vehicle Crew Staff & Operational Commanders to support the management of a Major Incident Response.  To refresh and consolidate understanding of response to major incidents  Apply Ten Second Triage to mass casualty incidents and to consider the LAS casualty management plans when deploying LAS operatives. 4. The Trust held a staff awards ceremony ‘Our LAS Awards’ Ceremony on 26th September. This was a fantastic event where all staff had the opportunity to nominate colleagues and teams that they felt earned special recognition for their work over the year. In total, nearly 1400 people were linked to nominations in 13 categories. Appendix D 5. The Trust has taken part in the filming of a new BBC documentary ‘Ambulance’ that is due to air in October. This is a fantastic opportunity to highlight to the public the challenges the Trust faces and the need to use our service appropriately. It highlights the rewarding work that staff undertake as well as development opportunities within the service for those who might want to join. What target your organisation has been working towards The LAS launched its 2023-2028 Strategy in September 2023. The full document is available online at Our plans for the future - London Ambulance Service NHS Trust. This strategy was the result of extensive engagement both inside our organisation, with our partners and with our patients on how they would like to see us develop. The strategy sets out three missions: 1. Our Care: Delivering outstanding emergency and urgent care whenever and wherever needed. 2. Our Organisation: Being an increasingly inclusive, well led and highly skilled organisation people are proud to work for. 3. Our London: Using our unique pan-London position to contribute to improving the health of the capital. Your organisation’s performance against these targets during the last year and how this compares to recent years  In North West London, the average response time to our Category 1 patients in the last three months was 7 mins 16 seconds for the 10,593 calls we attended. This is a 13% increase in calls for people in life-threatening circumstances, and we are working incredibly hard to reduce this response time even further.  The Trust is currently operating at REAP (Resource Escalation Action Plan) level 3 (Major Pressure). The Resource Escalation Action Plan is to support a consistent ambulance sector approach to strategic escalation pressure levels that provide alignment with the NHS Operational Pressures Escalation Framework (OPEL) whereby the symbolising of pressure levels is consistent and understood across the wider NHS. REAP provides NHS Ambulance Services with a consistent and coordinated approach across the organisation to the management of its response in situations where demand or other significant factors within the ambulance service see an increase and a challenge to the capacity to manage it.  Staff sickness rates within the Hillingdon Group are currently sitting at 7.2% for the last 12 months. Appendix D  The average on scene times (the length of time we are with patients) for our time critical patients is 36.4 minutes in the last six months (0.5 minutes quicker than the last six months). This is compared to a Trust average of 38.0 minutes.  We continue to champion the use of Alternative Care Pathways within the Hillingdon Group to reduce unnecessary conveyances of patients to the Emergency Department and ensure our patients are getting the most appropriate care for their needs. Following the audit reported in May, training sessions are being planned between staff from the Urgent Care Centre to our frontline staff in order to increase referrals. In the last three months, 52.1% of patients in Hillingdon were taken to an Emergency Department.  Clinical Quality continues to be reviewed within the Hillingdon Group and is measured in a number of different ways including Clinical Performance Indicators (CPIs), Cardiac and Stroke Care bundles and Cardiac Arrest Care bundles. This is achieved by reviewing the care provided by our clinicians and ensuring that the appropriate care has been delivered. Some key highlights from recent reports: - 95% of staff within the Hillingdon Group have received Clinical Performance Indicator feedback within the last six months. - Between the 1st of April 2024 and 31st July 2024 33% of cardiac arrest patients attended by a Hillingdon Crew sustained a return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) on arrival at hospital – where our teams manage to restart the heart rhythm following a cardiac arrest. Downloads of the Defib used in all cardiac arrest patients take place to provide feedback and assurance that all guidelines are followed with cardiac arrest management (Feb 2024 report). - 97% of Stroke patients received the appropriate and full care bundle (Feb 2024 report) Appendix D

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

34. Cabinet Forward Plan Monthly Monitoring PDF 239 KB
Consideration was given to the Cabinet Forward Plan. RESOLVED: That the Cabinet Forward Plan be noted.
📄 Cabinet Forward Plan Monthly Monitoring PDF 239 KB
Read the text of this document (3 pages)
Health and Social Care Select Committee – 9 October 2024 Classification: Public CABINET FORWARD PLAN Committee name Health and Social Care Select Committee Officer reporting Nikki O’Halloran, Democratic Services Papers with report Appendix A – Latest Forward Plan Ward As shown on the Forward Plan HEADLINES To monitor the Cabinet’s latest Forward Plan which sets out key decisions and other decisions to be taken by the Cabinet collectively and Cabinet Members individually over the coming year. The report sets out the actions available to the Committee. RECOMMENDATION That the Health and Social Care Select Committee notes the Cabinet Forward Plan. SUPPORTING INFORMATION The Cabinet Forward Plan is published monthly, usually around the first or second week of each month. It is a rolling document giving the required public notice of future key decisions to be taken. Should a later edition of the Forward Plan be published after this agenda has been circulated, Democratic Services will update the Committee on any new items or changes at the meeting. As part of its Terms of Reference, each Select Committee should consider the Forward Plan and, if it deems necessary, comment as appropriate to the decision -maker on the items listed which relate to services within its remit. For reference, the Forward Plan helpfully details which Select Committee’s remit covers the relevant future decision item listed. The Select Committee’s monitoring role of the Forward Plan can be undertaken in a variety of ways, including both pre-decision and post-decision scrutiny of the items listed. The provision of advance information on future items listed (potentially also draft reports) to the Committee in advance will often depend upon a variety of factors including timing or feasibility, and ultimately any such request would rest with the relevant Cabinet Member to decide. However, the 2019 Protocol on Overview & Scrutiny and Cabinet Relations (part of the Hillingdon Constitution) does provide guidance to Cabinet Members to:  Actively support the provision of relevant Council information and other requests from the Committee as part of their work programme; and  Where feasible, provide opportunities for committees to provide their input on forthcoming executive reports as set out in the Forward Plan to enable wider pre -decision scrutiny (in addition to those statutorily required to come before committees , i.e. policy framework documents – see paragraph below). As mentioned above, there is both a constitutional and statutory requirement for Select Committees to provide comments on the Cabinet’s draft budget and policy framework proposals after publication. These are automatically scheduled in advance to multi-year work programmes. Health and Social Care Select Committee – 9 October 2024 Classification: Public Therefore, in general, the Committee may consider the following actions on specific items listed on the Forward Plan: Committee action When How 1 To provide specific comments to be included in a future Cabinet or Cabinet Member report on matters within its remit. As part of its pre-decision scrutiny role, this would be where the Committee wishes to provide its influence and views on a particular matter within the formal report to the Cabinet or Cabinet Member before the decision is made. This would usually be where the Committee has previously considered a draft report or the topic in detail, or where it considers it has sufficient information already to provide relevant comments to the decision-maker. These would go within the standard section in every Cabinet or Cabinet Member report called “Select Committee comments”. The Cabinet or Cabinet Member would then consider these as part of any decision they make. 2 To request further information on future reports listed under its remit. As part of its pre-decision scrutiny role, this would be where the Committee wishes to discover more about a matter within its remit that is listed on the Forward Plan. Whilst such advance information can be requested from officers, the Committee should note that information may or may not be available in advance due to various factors, including timescales or the status of the drafting of the report itself and the formulation of final recommendation(s). Ultimately, the provision of any information in advance would be a matter for the Cabinet Member to decide. This would be considered at a subsequent Select Committee meeting. Alternatively, information could be circulated outside the meeting if reporting timescales require this. Upon the provision of any information, the Select Committee may then decide to provide specific comments (as per 1 above). 3 To request the Cabinet Member considers providing a draft of the report, if feasible, for the Select Committee to consider prior to it being considered formally for decision. As part of its pre-decision scrutiny role, this would be where the Committee wishes to provide an early steer or help shape a future report to Cabinet, e.g., on a policy matter. Whilst not the default position, Select Committees do occasionally receive draft versions of Cabinet reports prior to their formal consideration. The provision of such draft reports in advance may depend upon different factors, e.g., the timings required for that decision. Ultimately any request to see a draft report early would need the approval of the relevant Cabinet Member. Democratic Services would contact the relevant Cabinet Member and Officer upon any such request. If agreed, the draft report would be considered at a subsequent Select Committee meeting to provide views and feedback to officers before they finalise it for the Cabinet or Cabinet Member. An opportunity to provide specific comments (as per 1 above) is also possible. 4 To identify a forthcoming report that may merit a post- decision review at a later Select Committee meeting As part of its post-decision scrutiny and broader reviewing role, this would be where the Select Committee may wish to monitor the implementation of a certain Cabinet or Cabinet Member decision listed/taken at a later stage, i.e., to review its effectiveness after a period of 6 months. The Committee should note that this is different to the use of the post-decision scrutiny ‘call-in’ power which seeks to ask the Cabinet or Cabinet Member to formally re-consider a decision up to 5 working days after the decision notice has been issued. This is undertaken via the new Scrutiny Call-in App members of the relevant Select Committee. The Committee would add the matter to its multi- year work programme after a suitable time has elapsed upon the decision expected to be made by the Cabinet or Cabinet Member. Relevant service areas may be best to advise on the most appropriate time to review the matter once the decision is made. Health and Social Care Select Committee – 9 October 2024 Classification: Public BACKGROUND PAPERS  Protocol on Overview & Scrutiny and Cabinet relations adopted by Council 12 September 2019  Scrutiny Call-in App

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

📄 Appendix , item 34. PDF 144 KB
Read the text of this document (5 pages)
Ref Scheduled Upcoming Decisions Further details Ward(s) Final decision by Full Council Cabinet Member(s) Responsible Relevant Select Committee Directorate / Report Author Consultation related to the decision NEW ITEM Public or Private (with reason) SI Standard Items taken each month by the Cabinet Member Cabinet Members make a number of non-key decisions each month on standard items - details of these are listed at the end of the Forward Plan. Various All TBC C - Democratic Services Various Public SI Public Preview of matters to be considered in private A report to Cabinet to provide maximum transparency to residents on the private and confidential matters to be considered later in Part 2 of the Cabinet meeting and agenda. TBC All Cabinet Members All C - Democratic Services Public SI Reports from Select Committees Reports, findings and recommendations for consideration by the Cabinet, when referred from the appropriate Committee. All All TBC C - Democratic Services TBC Public SI Standard Items taken each month by the Cabinet Member Cabinet Members make a number of non-key decisions each month on standard items - details of these are listed at the end of the Forward Plan. Various All TBC C - Democratic Services Various Public SI Older People's Plan update Cabinet will receive its yearly progress update on the Older People's Plan and the work by the Council and partners to support older residents and their quality of life. All Cllr Ian Edwards - Leader of the Council / Cllr Jane Palmer - Health & Social Care Health & Social Care C - Sandra Taylor Select Committee / Older People, Leader's Initiative Public SI The Council's Budget - Medium Term Financial Forecast 2025/26 - 2029/30 (BUDGET FRAMEWORK) This report will set out the Medium Term Financial Forecast (MTFF), which includes the draft General Fund reserve budget and capital programme for 2025/26 for consultation, along with indicative projections for the following four years. This will also include the HRA rents for consideration and Council Tax Reduction Scheme proposals following consultation. All Proposed Full Council adoption - 20 February 2025 Cllr Martin Goddard - Finance All R - Richard Ennis Public consultation through the Select Committee process and statutory consultation with businesses & ratepayers Public SI Public Preview of matters to be considered in private A report to Cabinet to provide maximum transparency to residents on the private and confidential matters to be considered later in Part 2 of the Cabinet meeting and agenda. TBC All Cabinet Members All C - Democratic Services Public SI Reports from Select Committees Reports, findings and recommendations for consideration by the Cabinet, when referred from the appropriate Committee. All All TBC C - Democratic Services TBC Public SI = Standard Item each month/regularly Council Directorate/Service Areas: AS = Adult Services & Health P = Place C = Central Services R = Resources CS= Children's Services D = Digital & Intelligence Cabinet Member Decisions expected - October 2024 Cabinet meeting - Thursday 7 November 2024 (report deadline 21 October) Cabinet Member Decisions expected - November 2024 Cabinet meeting - Thursday 12 December 2024 (report deadline 25 November) 1 Ref Scheduled Upcoming Decisions Further details Ward(s) Final decision by Full Council Cabinet Member(s) Responsible Relevant Select Committee Directorate / Report Author Consultation related to the decision NEW ITEM Public or Private (with reason) SI = Standard Item each month/regularly Council Directorate/Service Areas: AS = Adult Services & Health P = Place C = Central Services R = Resources CS= Children's Services D = Digital & Intelligence SI Standard Items taken each month by the Cabinet Member Cabinet Members make a number of non-key decisions each month on standard items - details of these are listed at the end of the Forward Plan. Various All TBC C - Democratic Services Various Public SI Public Preview of matters to be considered in private A report to Cabinet to provide maximum transparency to residents on the private and confidential matters to be considered later in Part 2 of the Cabinet meeting and agenda. TBC All Cabinet Members All C - Democratic Services Public SI Reports from Select Committees Reports, findings and recommendations for consideration by the Cabinet, when referred from the appropriate Committee. All All TBC C - Democratic Services TBC Public SI Standard Items taken each month by the Cabinet Member Cabinet Members make a number of non-key decisions each month on standard items - details of these are listed at the end of the Forward Plan. Various All TBC C - Democratic Services Various Public SI The Council's Budget - Medium Term Financial Forecast 2025/26 - 2029/30 (BUDGET FRAMEWORK) Following consultation, this report will set out the Medium Term Financial Forecast (MTFF), which includes the draft General Fund reserve budget and capital programme for 2025/26 for consultation, along with indicative projections for the following four years. This will also include the HRA rents for consideration. All Proposed Full Council adoption - 20 February 2025 Cllr Ian Edwards - Leader of the Council / Cllr Martin Goddard - Finance All R - Richard Ennis Public consultation through the Select Committee process and statutory consultation with businesses & ratepayers Public SI Public Preview of matters to be considered in private A report to Cabinet to provide maximum transparency to residents on the private and confidential matters to be considered later in Part 2 of the Cabinet meeting and agenda. TBC All Cabinet Members All CS - Democratic Services Public SI Reports from Select Committees Reports, findings and recommendations for consideration by the Cabinet, when referred from the appropriate Committee. All All TBC CS - Democratic Services TBC Public SI Standard Items taken each month by the Cabinet Member Cabinet Members make a number of non-key decisions each month on standard items - details of these are listed at the end of the Forward Plan. Various All TBC CS - Democratic Services Various Public Cabinet meeting - Thursday 13 February 2025 (report deadline 27 January 2025) Cabinet Member Decisions expected - February 2025 Cabinet meeting - Thursday 9 January 2025 (report deadline 9 December 2024) Cabinet Member Decisions expected - January 2025 Cabinet meeting - Thursday 13 March 2025 (report deadline 24 February) Cabinet Member Decisions expected - December 2024 2 Ref Scheduled Upcoming Decisions Further details Ward(s) Final decision by Full Council Cabinet Member(s) Responsible Relevant Select Committee Directorate / Report Author Consultation related to the decision NEW ITEM Public or Private (with reason) SI = Standard Item each month/regularly Council Directorate/Service Areas: AS = Adult Services & Health P = Place C = Central Services R = Resources CS= Children's Services D = Digital & Intelligence SI Public Preview of matters to be considered in private A report to Cabinet to provide maximum transparency to residents on the private and confidential matters to be considered later in Part 2 of the Cabinet meeting and agenda. TBC All Cabinet Members All CS - Democratic Services Public SI Reports from Select Committees Reports, findings and recommendations for consideration by the Cabinet, when referred from the appropriate Committee. All All TBC CS - Democratic Services TBC Public SI Standard Items taken each month by the Cabinet Member Cabinet Members make a number of non-key decisions each month on standard items - details of these are listed at the end of the Forward Plan. Various All TBC CS - Democratic Services Various Public SI Public Preview of matters to be considered in private A report to Cabinet to provide maximum transparency to residents on the private and confidential matters to be considered later in Part 2 of the Cabinet meeting and agenda. TBC All Cabinet Members All C - Democratic Services Public SI Reports from Select Committees Reports, findings and recommendations for consideration by the Cabinet, when referred from the appropriate Committee. Various All TBC C - Democratic Services Various Public SI Standard Items taken each month by the Cabinet Member Cabinet Members make a number of decisions each month on standard items - details of these standard items are listed at the end of the Forward Plan. Various All TBC C - Democratic Services Various Public SI Reports from Select Committees Reports, findings and recommendations for consideration by the Cabinet, when referred from the appropriate Committee. Various All TBC C - Democratic Services Various Public SI Public Preview of matters to be considered in private A report to Cabinet to provide maximum transparency to residents on the private and confidential matters to be considered later in Part 2 of the Cabinet meeting and agenda. TBC All Cabinet Members All C - Democratic Services Public SI Standard Items taken each month by the Cabinet Member Cabinet Members make a number of decisions each month on standard items - details of these standard items are listed at the end of the Forward Plan. Various All TBC C - Democratic Services Various Public CABINET MEMBER DECISIONS: Standard Items (SI) that may be considered each month Cabinet Member Decisions expected - March 2025 Cabinet meeting - Thursday 10 April 2025 (report deadline 24 March) Cabinet Member Decisions expected - April 2025 Cabinet meeting - Thursday 22 May 2025 (report deadline 2 May) Cabinet Member Decisions expected - May 2025 3 Ref Scheduled Upcoming Decisions Further details Ward(s) Final decision by Full Council Cabinet Member(s) Responsible Relevant Select Committee Directorate / Report Author Consultation related to the decision NEW ITEM Public or Private (with reason) SI = Standard Item each month/regularly Council Directorate/Service Areas: AS = Adult Services & Health P = Place C = Central Services R = Resources CS= Children's Services D = Digital & Intelligence SI Urgent Cabinet-level decisions & interim decision-making (including emergency decisions) The Leader of the Council has the necessary authority to make decisions that would otherwise be reserved to the Cabinet, in the absence of a Cabinet meeting or in urgent circumstances. Any such decisions will be published in the usual way and reported to a subsequent Cabinet meeting for ratification. The Leader may also take emergency decisions without notice, in particular in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic, which will be ratified at a later Cabinet meeting. Various Cllr Ian Edwards - Leader of the Council TBC C - Democratic Services TBC Public / Private SI Release of Capital Funds The release of all capital monies requires formal Member approval, unless otherwise determined either by the Cabinet or the Leader. Batches of monthly reports (as well as occasional individual reports) to determine the release of capital for any schemes already agreed in the capital budget and previously approved by Cabinet or Cabinet Members TBC Cllr Martin Goddard - Finance (in conjunction with relevant Cabinet Member) All - TBC by decision made various Corporate Finance Public but some Private (1,2,3) SI Petitions about matters under the control of the Cabinet Cabinet Members will consider a number of petitions received by local residents and organisations and decide on future action. These will be arranged as Petition Hearings. TBC All TBC C - Democratic Services Public SI To approve compensation payments To approve compensation payments in relation to any complaint to the Council in excess of £1000. n/a All TBC R - Richard Ennis Private (1,2,3) SI Acceptance of Tenders To accept quotations, tenders, contract extensions and contract variations valued between £50k and £500k in their Portfolio Area where funding is previously included in Council budgets. n/a Cllr Ian Edwards - Leader of the Council OR Cllr Martin Goddard - Finance / in conjunction with relevant Cabinet Member TBC various Private (3) SI All Delegated Decisions by Cabinet to Cabinet Members, including tender and property decisions Where previously delegated by Cabinet, to make any necessary decisions, accept tenders, bids and authorise property decisions / transactions in accordance with the Procurement and Contract Standing Orders. TBC All TBC various Public / Private (1,2,3) 4 Ref Scheduled Upcoming Decisions Further details Ward(s) Final decision by Full Council Cabinet Member(s) Responsible Relevant Select Committee Directorate / Report Author Consultation related to the decision NEW ITEM Public or Private (with reason) SI = Standard Item each month/regularly Council Directorate/Service Areas: AS = Adult Services & Health P = Place C = Central Services R = Resources CS= Children's Services D = Digital & Intelligence SI External funding bids To authorise the making of bids for external funding where there is no requirement for a financial commitment from the Council. n/a All TBC various Public SI Response to key consultations that may impact upon the Borough A standard item to capture any emerging consultations from Government, the GLA or other public bodies and institutions that will impact upon the Borough. Where the deadline to respond cannot be met by the date of the Cabinet meeting, the Constitution allows the Cabinet Member to sign-off the response. TBC All TBC various Public Published 10 September 2024 - The Cabinet's Forward Plan is an official document by the London Borough of Hillingdon, UK 5

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

35. Work Programme PDF 147 KB
Consideration was given to the Committee’s Work Programme. It was agreed that the following changes be made to the Programme: 12 November 2024 – move consideration of the scoping report of the major review of adult social care early intervention and prevention to 12 November 2024 and hold the witness sessions on 25 February, 19 March and June 2025, with the final report being considered in July / September 2025; 12 November 2024 – hold a single meeting review of pharmacies on 12 November 2024; 12 November 2024 – include an item to discuss the evaluation of the wellbeing bus pilot that had taken place in Heathrow Villages; 12 November 2024 – receive a report on the use of Section 106 monies on health related projects at the meeting on 12 November 2024; and 23 January 2025 – receive an update from the Cabinet Member for Health and Social Care and the Corporate Director for Adult Social Care and Health at the meeting on 23 January 2025 in relation to the CQC report and other matters. It was noted that reports had been planned for consideration at the next meeting on 12 November 2024 on a range of issues such as the Older People’s Plan, 2024/25 BCF requirements and Autism Strategy consultation. The Democratic, Civic and Ceremonial Manager, in consultation with the Chair, would establish which reports needed to go to the next meeting and which could be deferred to a later date. RESOLVED: That the Work Programme, as amended, be agreed.
📄 Work Programme PDF 147 KB
Read the text of this document (2 pages)
Health and Social Care Select Committee – 9 October 2024 Classification: Public WORK PROGRAMME Committee name Health and Social Care Select Committee Officer reporting Nikki O’Halloran, Democratic Services Papers with report Appendix A – Work Programme Appendix B – Adult Social Care Early Intervention and Prevention Draft Scoping Report Ward All HEADLINES To enable the Committee to note future meeting dates and to forward plan its work for the current municipal year. RECOMMENDATION That the Health and Social Care Select Committee: 1. considers its Work Programme for the year and agrees any amendments; and 2. comments on and agrees the draft scoping report for the major review of early intervention and prevention in adult social care (attached to the report at Appendix B). SUPPORTING INFORMATION The meeting dates for the 2024/2025 municipal year were agreed by Council on 18 January 2024 and are as follows: Meetings Room Wednesday 19 June 2024, 6.30pm - CANCELLED TBA Wednesday 24 July 2024, 6.30pm CR5 Wednesday 11 September 2024, 6.30pm - PRIVATE CR6 Wednesday 11 September 2024, 7pm CR6 Wednesday 9 October 2024, 6.30pm CR5 Tuesday 12 November 2024, 6.30pm CR5 Thursday 23 January 2025, 6.30pm CR5 Tuesday 25 February 2025, 6.30pm CR5 Wednesday 19 March 2025, 6.30pm CR5 Tuesday 29 April 2025, 6.30pm CR5 At the Health and Social Care Select Committee meeting on 22 May 2024, it was agreed that the Democratic, Civic and Ceremonial Manager liaise with the Chair to schedule a new meeting date in October 2024. This meeting has been arranged for Wednesday 9 October 2024. Furthermore, it was agreed that the meeting scheduled for Wednesday 23 April 2025 be rearranged for Tuesday 29 April 2025. Health and Social Care Select Committee – 9 October 2024 Classification: Public Future Review Topics At the meeting on 24 July 2024, Members agreed to undertake single meeting reviews in relation to: 1. pharmacies and the delivery of front-line services. As the services provided by pharmacies had an impact on GPs, it was agreed that this single meeting review be undertaken first; and 2. GP coverage across the Borough. The Committee has agreed to undertake a major review in relation to adult social care early intervention and prevention with the first witness session provisionally scheduled for 12 November 2024. Members are asked to comment on and agree the draft terms of reference for this review which are attached to this report at Appendix B. As it had been agreed that hospice and end of life care services in the Borough be discussed at the Committee’s meeting on 10 September 2024, it was agreed that the health updates item that had been scheduled for that meeting be moved to the meeting on 9 October 2024. Implications on related Council policies The role of the Select Committees is to make recommendations on service changes and improvements to the Cabinet, who are responsible for the Council’s policy and direction. How this report benefits Hillingdon residents Select Committees directly engage residents in shaping po licy and recommendations and the Committees seek to improve the way the Council provides services to residents. Financial Implications None at this stage. Legal Implications None at this stage. BACKGROUND PAPERS NIL.

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

📄 Appendix A - Work Programme , item 35. PDF 94 KB
Read the text of this document (1 page)
2024/25 2025/26 May June (CANCELLED) July August September October November December January February March April May June July 22 19 24 No meeting 11 9 12 No meeting 23 25 19 29 No meeting Review A: ASC Early Intervention & Prevention Topic selection / scoping stage Topic Selection Selection Scoping Report Witness / evidence / consultation stage Witness Session Witness Session Witness Session Findings, conclusions and recommendations Findings Final review report agreement Final report Target Cabinet reporting Cabinet Review B: Pharmacies Single Meeting Review Review C: GP Coverage Single Meeting Review Regular service & performance monitoring Quarterly Performance Monitoring X Annual Report of Adult and Child Safeguarding Arrangements Carers Strategy Update (prior to Cabinet) MOVED TO JULY X Older People's Plan Update (prior to Cabinet) X Mid-year budget / budget planning report (July/September) Cabinet's Budget Proposals For Next Financial Year (Jan) X Cabinet Member for Health and Social Care X Cabinet Forward Plan Monthly Monitoring X X X X X X X X X One-off information items Autism Strategy Consultation X Carer Support Services - Cabinet report (079) MOVED TO JULY X Commissioning Model for delivery of health and social care services X 2024/25 BCF Planning Requirements X Adult Social Care Market Position Statement MOVED TO JULY X Hospice and End fo Life Services in the Borough X Health External Scrutiny Mount Vernon Cancer Centre Strategic Review Update X Hillingdon Hospital Redevelopment Update X X Health Updates X X X X Quality Accounts (outside of meetings) X Past review delivery Review of Children's Dental Services 2021/22 X Making the Council more autism friendly 2020/21 X CAMHS Referral Pathway 2023/24 X Health & Social Care Select Committee MULTI-YEAR WORK PROGRAMME

Text extracted automatically from the PDF, so layout, tables and images are not shown. Open the original PDF on LB Hillingdon’s website.

Page Updated: